Images of the terminal ileum are more convincing than cecal images for verifying the extent of colonoscopy

Background and study aims: Independent verification of colonoscopy completion is important for quality assurance. Cecal photographs aimed at showing key landmarks, including the ileocecal valve (ICV) and appendiceal orifice are the currently recommended standard, but are often perceived as unreliable. Images of the terminal ileum demonstrating villi may provide more robust evidence of completion. We sought to prospectively evaluate the ease of routine intubation of the terminal ileum and to compare the effectiveness of terminal ileum and cecal photographs in convincing independent reviewers that total colonoscopy had been accomplished.

Patients and methods: A prospective, observational study evaluated 216 consecutively completed colonoscopies performed in routine clinical practice. Cecal and terminal ileum photographs were evaluated and scored by independent reviewers. Frequency of terminal ileum intubation, time required, and safety parameters were recorded.

Results: The terminal ileum was intubated and photographed in 188/216 (87 %) of cases. Median time taken to intubate, or attempt to intubate the terminal ileum was 1 min 24 s, and was achieved without complications or requirement for additional sedation. Terminal ileum images were significantly more likely to be considered convincing than cecal images (P < 0.0001 for all reviewers). There was excellent interobserver agreement amongst the opinion of reviewers regarding terminal ileum photographs (kappa = 0.91).

Conclusion: Terminal ileum intubation is achievable rapidly and safely in the majority of patients undergoing colonoscopy. Terminal ileum images provide more convincing evidence of complete examination of the colon than cecal images, even when attempts to capture images specifically of the ICV and appendiceal orifice are made.

References

• 1 Rey J F, Lambert R. ESGE recommendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 901-903
• 2 Rex D K, Petrini J L, Baron T H et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 S16-S28
• 3 Thuraisingam A I, Brown J L, Anderson J T. What are the sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic photographs in determining completion of colonoscopy? Results from an online questionnaire.  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;  20 567-571
• 4 Marshall J B, Brown D N. Photodocumentation of total colonoscopy: how successful are endoscopists? Do reviewers agree?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 243-248
• 5 Rex D K. Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;  51 451-459
• 6 Barclay R L, O’Brien D E. Analysis of colonoscopic cecal intubation rates and cecal documentation in community-based colonoscopy: A prospective, observational study.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 AB215
• 7 Axon A T, Beilenhoff U, Bramble M G et al. Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) and gastrointestinal endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 1070-1080
• 8 Bramble M G, Ironside J W. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: implications for gastroenterology.  Gut. 2002;  50 888-890
• 9 Rutter M D, Bramble M G. Terminal ileal biopsies should not be used to document extent of colonoscopic examination.  Gut. 2005;  54 566
• 10 Powell N, Hayee B H, Yeoh D P et al. Terminal ileal photography or biopsy to verify total colonoscopy: does the endoscope agree with the microscope?.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 320-325
• 11 Iacopini G, Frontespezi S, Vitale M A et al. Routine ileoscopy at colonoscopy: a prospective evaluation of learning curve and skill-keeping line.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 250-256
• 12 Kundrotas L W, Clement D J, Kubik C M et al. A prospective evaluation of successful terminal ileum intubation during routine colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 544-546
• 13 Borsch G, Schmidt G. Endoscopy of the terminal ileum. Diagnostic yield in 400 consecutive examinations.  Dis Colon Rectum. 1985;  28 499-501
• 14 Baraza W, Brown S, Shorthouse A J et al. Direct photographic documentation of ileal mucosa in routine colonoscopy is not an independent valid or reliable proof of completion: quality assurance issues for the national colorectal cancer-screening programme.  Colorect Dis. 2009;  11 89-93