RSS-Feed abonnieren
Bitte kopieren Sie die angezeigte URL und fügen sie dann in Ihren RSS-Reader ein.
https://www.thieme-connect.de/rss/thieme/de/10.1055-s-00000012.xml
Endoscopy 2011; 43(2): 168
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256175
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256175
Correction
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet
Weitere Informationen
Publikationsverlauf
Publikationsdatum:
26. Januar 2011 (online)
Sahai AV, Paquin SC, Gariépy G et al. A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 900 – 903
In results, primary outcome, paragraph 2, the last sentence The first pass was S+ in 25/46 (54 % [95 % CI 39 – 69]) and S– in 21/46 (46 % [95 % CI 31 – 61]) should read: Due to an unrecognized limitation in the pass assignment sequence, all the cases retained for analysis were S+ first.