Endoscopy 2011; 43(6): 472-476
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256247
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Single- vs. double-balloon enteroscopy in small-bowel diagnostics: a randomized multicenter trial

D.  Domagk1 [*] , P.  Mensink2 [*] , H.  Aktas2 , P.  Lenz1 , T.  Meister1 , A.  Luegering1 , H.  Ullerich1 , L.  Aabakken3 , A.  Heinecke4 , W.  Domschke1 , E.  Kuipers2 , 5 , M.  Bretthauer3
  • 1Department of Medicine B, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC – University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • 3Department of Gastroenterology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway
  • 4Department of Medical Informatics and Biomathematics, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
  • 5Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC – University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 12 April 2010

accepted after revision 10 December 2010

Publication Date:
07 March 2011 (online)

Background and study aims: Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is the first choice endoscopic technique for small-bowel visualization. However, preparation and handling of the double-balloon enteroscope is complex. Recently, a single-balloon enteroscopy (SBE) system has been introduced as being a simplified, less-complex balloon-assisted enteroscopy system.

Patients and methods: This study was a randomized international multicenter trial comparing two balloon-assisted enteroscopy systems: DBE vs. SBE. Consecutive patients referred for balloon-assisted enteroscopy were randomized to either DBE or SBE. Patients were blinded with regard to the type of instrument used. The primary study outcome was oral insertion depth. Secondary outcomes included complete small-bowel visualization, anal insertion depth, patient discomfort, and adverse events. Patient discomfort during and after the procedure was scored using a visual analog scale.

Results: A total of 130 patients were included over 12 months: 65 with DBE and 65 with the SBE technique. Patient and procedure characteristics were comparable between the two groups. Mean oral intubation depth was 253 cm with DBE and 258 cm with SBE, showing noninferiority of SBE vs. DBE. Complete visualization of the small bowel was achieved in 18 % and 11 % of procedures in the DBE and SBE groups, respectively. Mean anal intubation depth was 107 cm in the DBE group and 118 cm in the SBE group. Diagnostic yield and mean pain scores during and after the procedures were similar in the two groups. No adverse events were observed during or after the examinations.

Conclusions: This head-to-head comparison study shows that DBE and SBE have a comparable performance and diagnostic yield for evaluation of the small bowel.

References

  • 1 Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y et al. Total enteroscopy with a non-surgical steerable double-balloon method.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 216-220
  • 2 Ell C, May A, Nachbar L et al. Push-and-pull enteroscopy in the small bowel using the double-balloon technique: results of a prospective European multicenter study.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 613-616
  • 3 May A, Nachbar L, Ell C. Double-balloon enteroscopy (push-and-pull enteroscopy) of the small bowel: feasibility and diagnostic and therapeutic yield in patients with suspected small bowel disease.  Gastrointest Endoc. 2005;  62 62-70
  • 4 Maaser C, Schmedt A, Bokemeyer M et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of double balloon enteroscopy – prospective and retrospective data from a single center study.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;  45 992-999
  • 5 Hartmann D, Eickhoff A, Tamm R et al. Balloon-assisted enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 Suppl 1 E276
  • 6 Tsujikawa T, Saitoh Y, Andoh A et al. Novel single-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of the small intestine: preliminary experiences.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 11-15
  • 7 May A, Färber M, Aschmoneit I et al. Prospective multicenter trial comparing push-and-pull enteroscopy with the single- and double-balloon techniques in patients with small-bowel disorders.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;  105 575-581
  • 8 Mönkemüller K, Fry L C, Bellutti M et al. Balloon-assisted enteroscopy: unifying double-balloon and single-balloon enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 537-539
  • 9 Domagk D, Bretthauer M, Lenz P et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation improves intubation depth in double-balloon enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 1064-1067
  • 10 May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M et al. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique: method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the endoscopy technique using the Erlangen endo-trainer.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 66-70
  • 11 Bretthauer M, Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff G et al. A randomized controlled trial to assess the safety and efficacy of carbon dioxide insufflation in colonoscopy.  Gut. 2002;  50 604-607
  • 12 Bretthauer M, Hoff G, Thiis-Evensen E et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation reduces discomfort due to flexible sigmoidoscopy in colorectal cancer screening.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;  37 1103-1108
  • 13 Pocock S J. Clinical trials – a practical approach.. New York: Wiley and Sons; 1983
  • 14 Mehdizadeh S, Ross A, Gerson L et al. What is the learning curve associated with double-balloon enteroscopy? Technical details and early experience in 6 U.S. tertiary care centers.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 740-750
  • 15 Ramchandani M, Reddy D N, Gupta R et al. Diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of single-balloon enteroscopy: series of 106 cases.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  24 1631-1638
  • 16 Pasha S F, Leighton J A, Das A et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy and capsule endoscopy have comparable diagnostic yield in small-bowel disease: a meta-analysis.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;  6 671-676
  • 17 Barreto-Zuñiga R, Tellez-Avila F I, Chavez-Tapia N C et al. Diagnostic yield, therapeutic impact, and complications of double-balloon enteroscopy in patients with small-bowel pathology.  Surg Endosc. 2008;  22 1223-1226
  • 18 Mönkemüller K, Weigt J, Treiber G et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of double-balloon enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 67-72
  • 19 Mensink P B, Haringsma J, Kucharzik T et al. Complications of double balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter survey.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 613-615
  • 20 Aktas H, Mensink P B, Haringsma J et al. Low incidence of hyperamylasemia after proximal double-balloon enteroscopy: has the insertion technique improved?.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 670-673
  • 21 Kaffes A J, Koo J H, Meredith C. Double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis and the management of small-bowel diseases: an initial experience in 40 patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 81-86
  • 22 Pérez-Cuadrado E, Más P, Hallal M et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy: a descriptive study of 50 explorations.  Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2006;  98 73-81
  • 23 Mönkemüller K, Weigt J, Treiber G et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic impact of double-balloon enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 67-72
  • 24 Di Caro S, May A, Heine D G et al. The European experience with double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, methodology, safety, and clinical impact.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 545-550
  • 25 Heine G D, Hadithi M, Groenen M J et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, diagnostic yield, and complications in a series of 275 patients with suspected small-bowel disease.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 42-48

1 These authors equally contributed to this work.

D. DomagkMD 

Department of Medicine B
University of Muenster

Albert-Schweitzer-Str. 33
D-48149 Münster
Germany

Fax: +49-251-8347576

Email: domagkd@uni-muenster.de