The 18th United European Gastroenterology Week (UEGW), held in Barcelona in October 2010, marked a return to the traditional “stand-alone” UEGW meeting after the previous year's combined congress format of GASTRO 2009. Various abstracts on endoscopic subjects were presented, providing a unique opportunity for those interested in gastrointestinal endoscopy to not only become acquainted with the latest advancements and research in the field, but also to meet and exchange experiences with colleagues from all over the world. This report will focus mainly on oral presentations, with a few selected poster presentations, which will be reviewed briefly in the context of recent literature in the respective fields of gastrointestinal endoscopy.
References
-
1
Inoue H, Minami H, Kaga M et al.
Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal dysplasia and carcinoma.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.
2010;
20
25-34, v-vi
-
2
Saito Y, Takisawa H, Suzuki H et al.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection of recurrent or residual superficial esophageal cancer after chemoradiotherapy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
355-359
-
3
Cho W Y, Kim Y J, Cho J Y et al.
Hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: endoscopic full-thickness resection of early gastric cancer and laparoscopic regional lymph node dissection – 14 human cases.
Endoscopy.
2011;
43
134-139
-
4
Goto O, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S et al.
Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer with special reference to validation for curability criteria.
Endoscopy.
2009;
41
118-122
-
5
Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T et al.
Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.
Surg Endosc.
2010;
24
343-352
-
6
Niimi K, Fujishiro M, Kodashima S et al.
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
723-729
-
7
Ribeiro-Mourão F, Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric lesions: results of an European inquiry.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
814-819
-
8
Moss A, Bourke M J, Tran K et al.
Lesion isolation by circumferential submucosal incision prior to endoscopic mucosal resection (CSI-EMR) substantially improves en bloc resection rates for 40-mm colonic lesions.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
400-404
-
9
Deprez P H, Bergman J J, Meisner S et al.
Current practice with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe: position statement from a panel of experts.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
853-858
-
10
Neuhaus H.
Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection in the West – too many concerns and caveats?.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
859-861
-
11
Marc G, Lopes C V.
Endoscopic resection of superficial gastrointestinal tumors.
World J Gastroenterol.
2008;
14
4600-4606
-
12
Larghi A, Waxman I.
State of the art on endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.
2007;
17
441-469, v
-
13
Probst A, Arnholdt H, Anthuber M, Messmann H.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the esophagus – First experience in a European center.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A38
-
14
Probst A, Pommer B, Arnholdt H et al.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in gastric lesions – 108 cases from a European center.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A39
-
15
Kato M, Nishida T, Tsutsui S et al.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection as a treatment for gastric noninvasive neoplasia: a multicenter study by Osaka University ESD Study Group.
J Gastroenterol.
DOI:
DOI: 10.1007/s00535-010-0350-1
-
16
Michida T, Maeda K, Iwahashi K et al.
Treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC) with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) – Long-term outcomes of a prospective study for the expanded indication.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A83
-
17
Lee Y, Cho J, Cho Y et al.
Effectiveness and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection in very elderly patients.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A76
-
18
Iizuka T, Kikuchi D, Hoteya S et al.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for treatment of mesopharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas.
Endoscopy.
2009;
41
113-117
-
19
Morita S, Muto M, Mashimo Y et al.
Endoscopic subepithelial dissection for superficial pharyngeal cancer: a case series of 56 superficial cancers.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A75
-
20
Kim D H, Jung H O, Choi K D et al.
Long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection for premalignant and early malignant lesions of the esophagus: comparison between EMR and ESD method.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A75
-
21
Spechler S J, Davila R.
Endoscopic therapy in Barrett's esophagus: when and how?.
Surg Oncol Clin N Am.
2009;
18
509-521
-
22
Ahmadi A, Draganov P.
Endoscopic mucosal resection in the upper gastrointestinal tract.
World J Gastroenterol.
2008;
14
1984-1989
-
23
Pouw R E, Gondrie J J, van Vilsteren F G et al.
A randomised prospective trial comparing the cap-technique and multi-band mucosectomy technique for piecemeal endoscopic resection in Barrett esophagus.
Gut.
2008;
57 (Suppl. I)I
A83
-
24
Pouw R E, Alvarez Herrero L, van Vilsteren F GI et al.
A randomized prospective trial in 74 patients comparing the ER-cap technique and multi-band mucosectomy technique for piecemeal endoscopic resection in Barrett esophagus.
Gut.
2009;
58 (Suppl. I)I
A47
-
25
Alvarez Herrero L, Pouw R E, van Vilsteren F G et al.
Multi-band mucosectomy in Barrett's oesophagus: a prospective registration of 1060 resections in 243 procedures.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A95
-
26
Alvarez Herrero L, Pouw R E, van Vilsteren F G et al.
Risk of lymph node metastasis associated with deeper invasion by early adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and cardia: study based on endoscopic resection specimens.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
1030-1036
-
27
Ishihara R, Kanzaki H, Uedo N et al.
Long-term outcome of oesophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas initially treated by endoscopic resection.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A75
-
28
Kakushima N, Fujishiro M.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastrointestinal neoplasms.
World J Gastroenterol.
2008;
14
2962-2967
-
29
Hoteya S, Iizuka T, Kikuchi D et al.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric submucosal tumor, endoscopic sub-tumoral dissection.
Dig Endosc.
2009;
21
266-269
-
30
Liu B, Song J, Qu B et al.
Endoscopic muscularis dissection for esophageal submucosal tumors originated from muscularis propria.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A68
-
31
Chung I-K, Kim S-J, Lee S-H et al.
What is the optimal duration of proton pump inhibitor and deciding factors for complete healing of artificial ulcers after endoscopic submucosal dissection?.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A75
-
32
Aikawa M, Miyazawa M, Okada K et al.
Development of an esophageal regenerative therapy with a bioabsorbable polymer sheet.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A76
-
33
Voermans R P, Deprez P, Le Moine O et al.
Endoscopic closure of iatrogenic perforations of the gastrointestinal tract using the over-the-scope-clip: a prospective multicenter human trial.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A64
-
34
Renteln D von, Vassiliou M C, Rothstein R I.
Randomized controlled trial comparing endoscopic clips and over-the-scope clips for closure of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gastrotomies.
Endoscopy.
2009;
41
1056-1061
-
35
Voermans R P, van Berge Henegouwen M I, Bemelman W A, Fockens P.
Hybrid NOTES transgastric cholecystectomy with reliable gastric closure: an animal survival study.
Surg Endosc.
DOI:
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1242-4
-
36
Pasricha P J, Hawari R, Ahmed I et al.
Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia.
Endoscopy.
2007;
39
761-764
-
37
Sumiyama K, Gostout C J, Rajan E et al.
Pilot study of transesophageal endoscopic epicardial coagulation by submucosal endoscopy with the mucosal flap safety valve technique (with videos).
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
497-501
-
38
Minami H, Inoue H, Kudo S.
Clinical experiences of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia.
Gut.
2009;
58 (Suppl. I)I
A8
-
39
Minami H, Inoue H, Hosoya T et al.
Per-oral endoscopic myotomy: POEM – 35 cases clinical experiences – noble endoscopic treatment against esophageal achalasia.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A2
-
40
Curvers W L, Herrero L A, Wallace M B et al.
Endoscopic tri-modal imaging is more effective than standard endoscopy in identifying early-stage neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus.
Gastroenterology.
2010;
139
1106-1114
-
41
Ignjatovic A, East J E, Suzuki N et al.
Are we ready for optical diagnosis? DISCARD study: early results.
Endoscopy.
2009;
41 Suppl 1
A226
-
42
Muto M, Horimatsu T, Ezoe Y et al.
Improving visualization techniques by narrow band imaging and magnification endoscopy.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2009;
24
1333-1346
-
43
Song L M, Adler D G, Conway J D. ASGE Technology Committee, .
Narrow band imaging and multiband imaging.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
67
581-589
-
44
Mannath J, Subramanian V, Hawkey C J et al.
Narrow band imaging for characterization of high grade dysplasia and specialized intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus: a meta-analysis.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
351-359
-
45
Tischendorf J J, Gross S, Winograd R et al.
Computer-aided classification of colorectal polyps based on vascular patterns: a pilot study.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
203-207
-
46
Uchiyama Y, Imazu H, Kakutani H et al.
New approach to diagnosing ampullary tumors by magnifying endoscopy combined with a narrow-band imaging system.
J Gastroenterol.
2006;
41
483-490
-
47
Itoi T, Neuhaus H, Chen Y K.
Diagnostic value of image-enhanced video cholangiopancreatoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.
2009;
19
557-566
-
48
Norimura D, Isomoto H, Akazawa Y et al.
Magnifying endoscopic observation with narrow band imaging for specialized intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus – importance of light blue crests.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A98
-
49
Norimura D, Isomoto H, Nakayama T et al.
Magnifying endoscopic observation with narrow band imaging for specialized intestinal metaplasia in Barrett's esophagus with special reference to light blue crests.
Dig Endosc.
2010;
22
101-106
-
50
Takaki Y, Yao K, Ono Y et al.
Usefulness and limitations of magnifying endoscopy (ME) with narrow-band imaging (NBI) for predicting depth of invasion of superficial esophageal carcinoma.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A98
-
51
Nagahama T, Yao K, Maki S et al.
Advantage of magnifying endoscopy (ME) with narrow-band imaging (NBI) over standard endoscopy for determining the margins of lateral extent of early gastric cancer.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A99
-
52
Pimentel-Nunes P, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Soares J et al.
Reproducibility and validity of high resolution-NBI (HR-NBI) endoscopy for diagnosis of intestinal metaplasia and gastric dysplasia.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A98
-
53
Coriat R, Chryssostalis A, Zeitoun J D et al.
Computed virtual chromoendoscopy system (FICE): a new tool for upper endoscopy?.
Gastroenterol Clin Biol.
2008;
32
363-369
-
54
Parra-Blanco A, Jiménez A, Rembacken B et al.
Validation of Fujinon intelligent chromoendoscopy with high definition endoscopes in colonoscopy.
World J Gastroenterol.
2009;
15
5266-5273
-
55
Neumann H, Fry L C, Bellutti M et al.
Double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted virtual chromoendoscopy for small-bowel disorders: a case series.
Endoscopy.
2009;
41
468-471
-
56
Hiraga Y, Sumioka M, Akagi M et al.
Comparison between avascular-area of NBI magnification and type V pit pattern for invasion depth diagnosis of colorectal tumors.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2010;
71
AB210
-
57
Hiraga Y, Sumioka M, Akagi M et al.
Comparison between narrow band imaging (NBI) magnification and flexible spectral imaging color enhancement (FICE) magnification for invasion depth diagnosis of colorectal tumors.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A72
-
58
Teixeira C R, Oliveira L A, Saito Y et al.
Worldwide multicenter interobserver validation of a novel endoscopic classification of the capillary vessel pattern of colorectal lesions.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A72
-
59
East J E, Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S et al.
A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
2008;
28
768-776
-
60
Curvers W L, Kiesslich R, Bergman J J.
Novel imaging modalities in the detection of oesophageal neoplasia.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol.
2008;
22
687-720
-
61
Kimura T, Yamano H-O, Yamamoto E et al.
Identification of precursor lesions of colorectal cancers with CPG island methylator phenotype by molecular magnifying colonoscopy.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A58
-
62
Jass J R.
Classification of colorectal cancer based on correlation of clinical, morphological and molecular features.
Histopathology.
2007;
50
113-130
-
63
Miwa S, Mitomi H, Igarashi M et al.
Clinicopathologic differences among subtypes of serrated adenomas of the colorectum.
Hepatogastroenterology.
2005;
52
437-440
-
64
Wallace M B, Sharma P, Lightdale C et al.
Preliminary accuracy and interobserver agreement for the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2010;
72
19-24
-
65
Pohl H, Koch M, Khalifa A et al.
Evaluation of endocytoscopy in the surveillance of patients with Barrett's esophagus.
Endoscopy.
2007;
39
492-496
-
66
Kiesslich R, Goetz M, Neurath M F.
Virtual histology.
Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol.
2008;
22
883-897
-
67
Inoue H, Sasajima K, Kaga M et al.
Endoscopic in vivo evaluation of tissue atypia in the esophagus using a newly designed integrated endocytoscope: a pilot trial.
Endoscopy.
2006;
38
891-895
-
68
Kumagai Y, Kawada K, Yamazaki S et al.
Prospective replacement of magnifying endoscopy by a newly developed endocytoscope, the ‘GIF-Y0002’.
Dis Esophagus.
2010;
23
627-632
-
69
Papanikolaou I S, Rösch T.
GASTRO 2009 report: putting endoscopy into perspective.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
581-594
-
70
Kudo T, Inoue H, Minami H et al.
In vivo endocytoscopic evaluation of gastric cancer; can optical biopsy replace pathology?.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A98
-
71
Mori Y, Kudo S-E, Ikehara N et al.
Accuracy and reliability of predicting massively invasive submucosal colorectal cancers with endocytoscopy – A prospective comparative study.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A73
-
72
Rispo A, Maione F, Castiglione F et al.
Diagnostic accuracy of confocal fluorescence microscopy in detecting dysplasia in patients affected by long-standing ulcerative colitis.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A58
-
73
Hlavaty T, Huorka M, Koller T et al.
Colorectal cancer screening in patients with ulcerative and Crohn's colitis with use of colonoscopy, chromoendoscopy and confocal endomicroscopy.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A58
-
74
Eisendrath P, Devière J.
“Red flag” techniques in Barrett's esophagus: minor additional benefit or a waste of time?.
Endoscopy.
2006;
38
929-931
-
75
Curvers W L, Singh R, Wallace M B et al.
Identification of predictive factors for early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus after autofluorescence imaging: a stepwise multicenter structured assessment.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2009;
70
9-17
-
76
Matsuda T, Saito Y, Fu K I et al.
Does autofluorescence imaging video endoscopy system improve the colonoscopic polyp detection rate? A pilot study.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2008;
103
1926-1932
-
77
Asaoka D, Nagahara A, Oguro M et al.
Utility of autofluorescence imaging video endoscopy in screening for Barrett's esophagus.
Endoscopy.
2009;
41 Suppl 2
E113
-
78
Curvers W L, Singh R, Song L M et al.
Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus: a multi-centre feasibility study using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging incorporated in one endoscopy system.
Gut.
2008;
57
167-172
-
79
Aihara H, Saito S, Tajiri H.
Differential diagnosis of colorectal neoplastic lesion from non-neoplastic lesions with color-tone grading in autofluorescence endoscopy.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A71
-
80
Lim L G, Bajbouj M, Delius S von et al.
Fluorescein-enhanced autofluorescence imaging can accurately differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic colorectal lesions: a feasibility study.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A72
-
81
Takeuchi Y, Inoue T, Hanaoka N et al.
Combination of autofluorescence imaging and a transparent hood for detection of colorectal neoplasms: a prospective randomized trial.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A72
-
82
Takeuchi Y, Inoue T, Hanaoka N et al.
Autofluorescence imaging with a transparent hood for detection of colorectal neoplasms: a prospective, randomized trial.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2010;
72
1006-1013
-
83
Longcroft-Wheaton G, Mead R, Bhandari P.
A large prospective cohort study demonstrating the cost effectiveness of acetic acid chromoendoscopy in the evaluation of Barrett's neoplasia.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A97
-
84
Lundell L R.
Etiology and risk factors for esophageal carcinoma.
Dig Dis.
2010;
28
641-644
-
85
Cooper S C, Graham P J, Trudgill N.
Risk factors for the development of oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a United Kingdom primary care nested case-control study.
Gut.
2008;
57
A1-A172
-
86
Menon S, Trudgill N.
COPD and the risk of Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a matched cohort study.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A4
-
87
Heuberger D, Manner H, Ell C et al.
How is early Barrett's cancer currently diagnosed and treated throughout Western Europe? Results of a survey at 107 University Hospitals in 8 Western European countries.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A258
-
88
Roorda A K, Marcus S N, Triadafilopoulos G.
Early experience with radiofrequency energy ablation therapy for Barrett's esophagus with and without dysplasia.
Dis Esophagus.
2007;
20
516-522
-
89
Fleischer D E, Overholt B F, Sharma V K et al.
Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for Barrett's esophagus: 5-year outcomes from a prospective multicenter trial.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
781-789
-
90
Shaheen N J, Sharma P, Overholt B F et al.
Radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia.
N Engl J Med.
2009;
360
2277-2288
-
91
Shaheen N J, Peery A F, Hawes R H et al.
Quality of life following radiofrequency ablation of dysplastic Barrett's esophagus.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
790-799
-
92
Pouw R E, Bisschops R, Pech O et al.
Safety outcomes of balloon-based circumferential radiofrequency ablation after focal endoscopic resection of early Barrett's neoplasia in 118 patients: results of an ongoing European multicenter study.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A94
-
93
Garcia Iglesias P, Villòria A, Suarez Lamas D et al.
Systematic review and meta-analysis: predictors of recurrent hemorrhage after endoscopic hemostatic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcers.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A2
-
94
Lim L G, Ho K Y, Lim L L et al.
Glasgow Blatchford score as a triage tool for emergency endoscopy in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleed.
Gut.
2009;
58 (Suppl. II)
A92
-
95
Lim L G, Ho K Y, Chan Y H et al.
Urgent endoscopy is associated with lower mortality in high-risk but not low-risk non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A42
-
96
Sung J J-Y, Luo D, Wu J C et al.
Safety and efficacy of nanopowder TC325 (hemostatic spray) in the treatment of active ulcer bleeding.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A44
-
97
Lima J C, Monici L T, Gomes V P et al.
Argon plasma coagulation in distal esophagus prevents recurrence of oesophageal varices after eradication using band ligation.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A30
-
98
Bonilha D Q, Correia L P, Gomes G F et al.
Endoscopic variceal ligation (RVL) alone versus endoscopic variceal ligation plus propranolol in variceal bleeding prophylaxis in cirrhotic patients.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A55
-
99
Di Pascoli L, Gregori D, Buja A et al.
Pharmacoeconomical analysis of primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding with beta-blockers vs. endoscopic surveillance in cirrhotic patients with small esophageal varices.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A55
-
100
Eliakim R.
Video capsule endoscopy of the small bowel.
Curr Opin Gastroenterol.
2010;
26
129-133
-
101
Kaffes A J.
Achieving total enteroscopy with capsule endoscopy in all patients: are we stretching the limits of technology?.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2009;
69
81-83
-
102
Li X, Chen H, Dai J et al.
Predictive role of capsule endoscopy on the insertion route of double-balloon enteroscopy.
Endoscopy.
2009;
41
762-766
-
103
Arakawa D, Ohmiya N, Nakamura M et al.
Outcome after enteroscopy for patients with obscure GI bleeding: diagnostic comparison between double-balloon endoscopy and video capsule endoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2009;
69
866-874
-
104
May A.
How to approach the small bowel with flexible enteroscopy.
Gastroenterol Clin North Am.
2010;
39
797-806
-
105
May A, Färber M, Aschmoneit I et al.
Prospective multicenter trial comparing push-and-pull enteroscopy with the single- and double-balloon techniques in patients with small-bowel disorders.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2010;
105
575-581
-
106
Frieling T, Heise J, Sassenrath W et al.
Prospective comparison between double-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
885-888
-
107
Dulic-Lakovic E, Dulic M, Hubner D et al.
Bleeding from Dieulafoy lesions of the small bowel: a systematic study on epidemiology and efficacy of enteroscopic treatment.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A30
-
108
Akerman P A, Demarco D, Pangtay J.
A pilot study of spiral enteroscopy using a new design self propelled motorized enteroscope with an integrated spiral.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A64
-
109
Akerman P A, Demarco D, Pangtay J.
A self propelled spiral enteroscope with an integrated remote control spiral in a case of obscure Crohn's disease.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A66
-
110
Swain P, Toor A, Volke F et al.
Remote magnetic manipulation of a wireless capsule endoscope in the esophagus and stomach of humans (with videos).
Gastrointest Endosc.
2010;
71
1290-1293
-
111
Valdastri P, Quaglia C, Buselli E et al.
A magnetic internal mechanism for precise orientation of the camera in wireless endoluminal applications.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
481-486
-
112
Rey J F, Ogata H, Hosoe N et al.
Feasibility of stomach exploration with a guided capsule endoscope.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
541-545
-
113
Rey J F, Ogata H, Hosoe N et al.
First clinical trial on gastric examination with a guided capsule endoscopy.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A26
-
114
Keller J, Fibbe C, Volke F et al.
Inspection of the human stomach using remote-controlled capsule endoscopy.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A27
-
115
Aihara H, Ikeda K, Tajiri H.
Capsule endoscopy based on the mucosal vascularity diagnosis by using capsule equipped with selected white-light LED.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A43
-
116
Lecleire S, Duclos A, Iwanicki-Caron I et al.
Emergency capsule endoscopy in severe acute obscure-overt gastrointestinal bleeding: diagnostic yield and impact on further clinical management.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A43
-
117
Jensen M D, Nathan T, Rafaelsen S R et al.
Better diagnostic accuracy with capsule endoscopy compared to MRI- and CT-enterography in patients with suspected or newly diagnosed Crohn's disease.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A27
-
118
Triantafyllou K, Viazis N, Tsibouris P et al.
Colon capsule endoscopy complements incomplete colonoscopy in clinical practice.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A27
-
119
Triantafyllou K, Tsibouris P, Kalantzis C et al.
PillCam Colon capsule endoscopy does not always complement incomplete colonoscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2009;
69
572-576
-
120
Thiis-Evensen E, Bretthauer M, Kalager M et al.
First randomized trial of colonoscopy screening for the prevention of colorectal cancer.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A34
-
121
Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Aminalai A et al.
Prospective quality assessment of screening-colonoscopy in Berlin (Berlin Colonoscopy Project, BECOP-3).
Endoscopy.
2008;
40 (Suppl. I)
A197
-
122
Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou I S et al.
A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect?.
Gut.
2008;
57
59-64
-
123
Triantafyllou K, Kalli T, Misailidis N et al.
Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program (CQI) on colonoscopy performance in an academic endoscopy facility.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A377
-
124
Lieberman D.
Progress and challenges in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.
Gastroenterology.
2010;
138
2115-2126
-
125
Pullens H, Oijen M V, Laheij R et al.
No change in colorectal cancer stage 4 years after revision of the surveillance guidelines after polypectomy in the Netherlands.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A85
-
126
Suchanek S, Zavoral M, Majek O et al.
National colorectal cancer screening programme in the Czech Republic.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A84
-
127
Denters M, Deutekom M, Bossuyt P et al.
Cancers detected in participants of an FOBT based screening pilot are less advanced than cancers detected in nonparticipants of the same cohort.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A84
-
128
Saito Y, Hyodo I, Suzuki H et al.
A comparison study of colorectal cancer positive predictive value and Dukes classification between the first day positive and negative group of 2 days FIT colorectal cancer screening.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A84
-
129
Terhaar Sive Droste J S, van Turenhout S, Oort F A et al.
Can elective colonoscopy be postponed after a negative faecal immunochemical test in asymptomatic high risk patients?.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A85
-
130
Tobal F, Tobal D.
Endoscopy in the elderly. Findings justify risks?.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A96
-
131
Hoffmeister M, Schmitz S, Karmrodt E et al.
Male sex and smoking have a larger impact on the prevalence of colorectal neoplasia than family history of colorectal cancer.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2010;
8
870-876
-
132
Ferlitsch M, Reinhart K, Gal O et al.
Time for a gender specific age for referring patients to screening colonoscopy?.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A96
-
133
Cha J M, Lee J I, Joo K R et al.
Safety and cost-effectiveness of outpatient colonoscopic polypectomy.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A21
-
134
Longcroft-Wheaton G, Mead R, Duku M et al.
Colonic endoscopic mucosal resection: results from a large prospective series in a western setting.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A39
-
135
Longcroft-Wheaton G, Mead R, Uraoka T et al.
Validation of a novel polyp classification system and comparison of outcomes between a Japanese and Western expert: a prospective study.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A97
-
136
Hahn S J, Kim J H, Ryu Y S et al.
Efficacy of hemoclips on prevention from delayed bleeding after endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal polyps.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A40
-
137
Uraoka T, Saito Y, Yamaguchi Y et al.
Large-scale multicenter analysis of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection-related complications.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A40
-
138
Meining A, Frimberger E, Becker V et al.
Detection of cholangiocarcinoma in vivo using miniprobe-based confocal fluorescence microscopy.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2008;
6
1057-1060
-
139
Meining A.
Confocal endomicroscopy.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.
2009;
19
629-635
-
140
Loeser C S, Robert M E, Mennone A et al.
Confocal endomicroscopic examination of malignant biliary strictures and histologic correlation with lymphatics.
J Clin Gastroenterol.
DOI:
DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e3181fbdc38
-
141
Costamagna G, Cesaro P, Tringali A et al.
In-vivo miniprobe-based confocal fluorescence endomicroscopy (Cellvizio) for hilar biliary strictures.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A66
-
142
Lim L G, Mayr M, Alguel H et al.
Cholangioscopy and probe-based confocal endomicroscopy in the diagnosis of an unusual liver cyst.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A67
-
143
Chen Y, Shah R, Slivka A et al.
Miami classification (MC) of probe-based confocal endomicroscopy findings in indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures (PB-PCLE): combination MC criteria improves predictive value.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A88
-
144
Chen Y K, Pleskow D K.
SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video).
Gastrointest Endosc.
2007;
65
832-841
-
145
Fishman D S, Tarnasky P R, Patel S N et al.
Management of pancreaticobiliary disease using a new intra-ductal endoscope: the Texas experience.
World J Gastroenterol.
2009;
15
1353-1358
-
146
Judah J R, Draganov P V.
Intraductal biliary and pancreatic endoscopy: an expanding scope of possibility.
World J Gastroenterol.
2008;
14
3129-3136
-
147
Barkay O, Bucksot L, Sherman S.
Endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage with the SpyGlass cholangiopancreatoscopy system.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2009;
70
1039-1040
-
148
Ransibrahmanakul K, Hasyagar C, Prindiville T.
Removal of bile duct foreign body by using spyglass and spybite.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2010;
8
e9
-
149
Leblanc S, Duchmann J C, Boyer J et al.
Combined cholangioscopy (Spyglass®) and probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (P-CLE) in undetermined biliary stenosis: preliminary results.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A88
-
150
Xue A, Scarlett C J, Chung L et al.
Discovery of serum biomarkers for pancreatic adenocarcinoma using proteomic analysis.
Br J Cancer.
2010;
103
391-400
-
151
Bonney G K, Craven R A, Prasad R et al.
Circulating markers of biliary malignancy: opportunities in proteomics?.
Lancet Oncol.
2008;
9
149-158
-
152
Chung J W, Park J Y, Kim S A et al.
Proteomics of pancreatic juice to find diagnostic biomarkers of pancreatic cancer.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A33
-
153
Zabron A, Horneffer-Van der Sluis V, Gierula M et al.
Proteomic analysis of bile in pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A33
-
154
Gincul R, Scoazec J-Y, Ponchon T et al.
Endoscopic curative treatment of early ampullary tumors (ampullectomy). Long term results of a large multicenter prospective study.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A90
-
155
Bhati C S, Kubal C, Sihag P K et al.
Effect of preoperative biliary drainage on outcome of classical pancreaticoduodenectomy.
World J Gastroenterol.
2007;
13
1240-1242
-
156
Velanovich V, Kheibek T, Khan M.
Relationship of postoperative complications from preoperative biliary stents after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A new cohort analysis and meta-analysis of modern studies.
JOP.
2009;
10
24-29
-
157
Smith R A, Dajani K, Dodd S et al.
Preoperative resolution of jaundice following biliary stenting predicts more favourable early survival in resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Ann Surg Oncol.
2008;
15
3138-3146
-
158
Lawrence C, Howell D A, Conklin D E et al.
Delayed pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer patients with prior ERCP-placed, nonforeshortening, self-expanding metal stents: a positive outcome.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2006;
63
804-807
-
159
Mumtaz K, Hamid S, Jafri W.
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography with or without stenting in patients with pancreaticobiliary malignancy, prior to surgery.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev
2007;
( (3).)
CD006001
-
160
Coates J M, Beal S H, Russo J E et al.
Negligible effect of selective preoperative biliary drainage on perioperative resuscitation, morbidity, and mortality in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Arch Surg.
2009;
144
841-847
-
161
Eshuis W J, Van der Gaag N A, Rauws E A et al.
Therapeutic delay and survival after surgery for cancer of the pancreatic head with or without preoperative biliary drainage.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A33
-
162
Duclos A, Ben Soussan E, Antonietti M et al.
Predictive factors of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicentre study.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A82
-
163
Ito K, Fujita N, Kanno A et al.
Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients at high risk who underwent prophylactic pancreatic duct stent placement. A multicenter study.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A82
-
164
Kobayashi G, Fujita N, Imaizumi K et al.
Can a guidewire cannulation technique reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis? A multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A89
-
165
Cheung J, Tsoi K K, Quan W L et al.
Guidewire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2009;
70
1211-1219
-
166
Dumonceau J M, Andriulli A, Deviere J et al.
European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline: prophylaxis of post-ERCP pancreatitis.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
503-515
-
167
Lee T H, Park do H, Park J Y et al.
Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2009;
69
444-449
-
168
Sharma V K, Howden C W.
Metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and endoscopic sphincterotomy for the treatment of acute biliary pancreatitis.
Am J Gastroenterol.
1999;
94
3211-3214
-
169
Moretti A, Papi C, Aratari A et al.
Is early endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography useful in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dig Liver Dis.
2008;
40
379-385
-
170
Dubravcsik Z, Szepes A, Fejes R et al.
Early ERCP and biliary sphincterotomy with or without small caliber pancreatic stent in patients with gallstone pancreatitis – nonrandomized, prospective, dual center trial.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl I)
A89
-
171
Koornstra J J, Fry L, Mönkemüller K.
ERCP with the balloon-assisted enteroscopy technique: a systematic review.
Dig Dis.
2008;
26
324-329
-
172
Shah R J, Smolkin M, Yen R et al.
A multi-center, U.S. experience of single balloon, double balloon, and spiral overtube enteroscopy-assisted ERCP in long limb surgical bypass patients.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A88
-
173
Papanikolaou I S, Fockens P, Hawes R et al.
Update on endoscopic ultrasound: how much for imaging, needling, or therapy?.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
2008;
43
1416-1424
-
174
Shami V M, Kahaleh M.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided cholangiopancreatography and rendezvous techniques.
Dig Liver Dis.
2010;
42
419-424
-
175
Khashab M, Mokadem M, DeWitt J et al.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with or without flow cytometry for the diagnosis of primary pancreatic lymphoma – a case series.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
228-231
-
176
Philipper M, Hollerbach S, Gabbert H E et al.
Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
300-305
-
177
Möller K, Papanikolaou I S, Toermer T et al.
EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: high yield of 2 passes with combined histologic-cytologic analysis.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2009;
70
60-69
-
178
Seo D W.
EUS-guided antitumor therapy for pancreatic tumors.
Gut Liver.
2010;
4 Suppl 1
S76-S81
-
179
Ergun M, Aouattah T, Gillain C et al.
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided transluminal drainage of pancreatic duct obstruction: long term outcome.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A5
-
180
Christiaens P, Moons V, D'Haens G et al.
Transgastric biliary drainage.
Endoscopy.
2009;
41 Suppl 1
A3
-
181
Perez-Miranda M, de la Serna C, Diez-Redondo P et al.
Endo-sonography-guided cholangiopancreatography (ESCP) as the primary approach for ductal drainage after failed ERCP.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A6
-
182
Hara K, Yamao K, Niwa Y et al.
EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) for patients with malignant biliary obstruction.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A6
-
183
Bories E, Almeido F, Pesenti C et al.
Endoscopic ultrasound guided hepaticogastrostomy: retrospective study and outcome in 44 patients.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A90
-
184
Seewald S, Ang T L, Teng K C et al.
EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts, abscesses and infected necrosis.
Dig Endosc.
2009;
21 Suppl 1
S61-S65
-
185
Giovannini M, Araujo W, Coelho N et al.
EUS-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst and abscesses: an assessment of 109 patients.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A22
-
186
Roesch T, Papanikolaou I S, Ponchon T et al.
Pilot study on the technical performance of a new forward viewing linear echoendoscope for FNA and cyst drainage.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2007;
65
M1211
-
187
Voermans R P, Eisendrath P, Bruno M J et al.
Initial evaluation of a novel prototype forward-viewing US endoscope in transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos).
Gastrointest Endosc.
2007;
66
1013-1017
-
188
Irisawa A, Imaizumi H, Hikichi T et al.
Feasibility of interventional endoscopic ultrasound using forward-viewing and curved linear-array echoendoscope: a literature review.
Dig Endosc.
2010;
22 Suppl 1
S128-S131
-
189
Voermans R P, Ponchon T, Larghi A et al.
Randomized controlled comparison of forward-viewing versus oblique-viewing EUS-scopes in drainage of pancreatic fluid collections.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A6
-
190
Pausawasdi N, Heidt D, Kwon R et al.
Long-term follow-up of patients with incidentally discovered pancreatic cystic neoplasms evaluated by endoscopic ultrasound.
Surgery.
2010;
147
13-20
-
191
Ardengh J C, Coelho-Neto D E, Coelho J FE et al.
Clinical impact of EUS-FNA in the management of the incidental pancreatic cysts. A prospective assessment.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A6
-
192
Attasaranya S, Pais S, LeBlanc J et al.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and cyst fluid analysis for pancreatic cysts.
JOP.
2007;
8
553-563
-
193
Zhang S, Defrias D V, Alasadi R et al.
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA): experience of an academic centre in the USA.
Cytopathology.
2010;
21
35-43
-
194
Maire F, Voitot H, Aubert A et al.
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: performance of pancreatic fluid analysis for positive diagnosis and the prediction of malignancy.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2008;
103
2871-2877
-
195
Lee K S, Sekhar A, Rofsky N M et al.
Prevalence of incidental pancreatic cysts in the adult population on MR imaging.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2010;
105
2079-2084
-
196
De Jong K, van Hooft J E, Poley J W et al.
Accuracy of MRI and EUS in a prospective cohort of patients with histologically confirmed cystic lesions of the pancreas.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A27
-
197
Tan H K, Li M Q, Ling K L et al.
EUS and pancreatic cyst fluid analysis in predicting potentially malignant/malignant cystic lesions of the pancreas.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A21
-
198
Sawai Y, Yamao K, Bhatia V et al.
Development of pancreatic cancers during long-term follow-up of side-branch intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
1077-1084
-
199
Kubo H, Chijiiwa Y, Akahoshi K et al.
Intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas: differential diagnosis between benign and malignant tumors by endoscopic ultrasonography.
Am J Gastroenterol.
2001;
96
1429-1434
-
200
Aso A, Kubo H, Itaba S et al.
Preoperative evaluation of benign or malignant intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas by endoscopic ultrasonography.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A69
-
201
Maire F, Couvelard A, Palazzo L et al.
From pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PANIN) to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN): what is the significance of endoscopic ultrasound findings?.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A34
-
202
Napoleon B, Alvarez-Sanchez M V, Gincoul R et al.
Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in solid lesions of the pancreas: results of a pilot study.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
564-570
-
203
Imazu H, Uchiyama Y, Matsunaga K et al.
Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS with novel ultrasonographic contrast (Sonazoid) in the preoperative T-staging for pancreaticobiliary malignancies.
Scand J Gastroenterol.
2010;
45
732-738
-
204
Hirooka Y, Itoh A, Kawashima H et al.
Diagnosis of pancreatic disorders using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic elastography.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol.
2009;
7 (11 Suppl)
S63-S67
-
205
Kitano M, Takagi T, Sakamoto H et al.
Characterization of small pancreatic neoplasms by contrast enhanced harmonic EUS.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A68
-
206
Imazu H, Uchiyama Y, Ikeda K et al.
Novel quantitative perfusion analysis with contrast enhanced harmonic EUS facilitate distinguishing chronic pancreatitis from pancreatic cancer.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A69
-
207
Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu F et al.
Neural network analysis of dynamic sequences of EUS elastography used for the differential diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.
Gastrointest Endosc.
2008;
68
1086-1094
-
208
Badaoui A, Borbath I, Aouattah T et al.
Evaluation of pancreatic tumors with contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography and EUS-strain ratio elastography.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A69
-
209
Delius S von, Meining A.
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).
Endoscopy.
2010;
42
73-76
-
210
Dallemagne B, Perretta S.
Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).
Endoscopy.
2009;
41
895-897
-
211
Rao G V, Reddy D N, Banerjee R.
NOTES: human experience.
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am.
2008;
18
361-370; x
-
212
Noguera J F, Cuadrado A, Sánchez-Margallo F M et al.
Emergency transvaginal hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.
Endoscopy.
DOI:
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256042
-
213
Cho W Y, Kim Y J, Cho J Y et al.
Hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: endoscopic full-thickness resection of early gastric cancer and laparoscopic regional lymph node dissection – 14 human cases.
Endoscopy.
2011;
43
134-139
-
214
Sugimoto M, Morita Y, Matsuoka Y et al.
Stereo-3D navigated transgastric interventional EUS and NOTES using magnetic resonance endoscopy and magnetic scope detection system.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A16
-
215
Vilmann P, Bhutani M, Saftoiu A et al.
Transgastric localization with dissection of the pancreatic tail by EUS-assisted NOTES: a feasibility study.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A15
-
216
Deprez P, Schroeven M, Chioccioli C et al.
Successful management of a chronic tracheoesophageal fistula by a combination of ESD, matrix implantation and tracheal stenting.
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A66
-
217
Kratt T, Stüker D, Feilitzsch M von et al.
Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal perforations, severe hemorrhages and postoperative complications with a new over-the-scope-clip (OTSC) device: experiences with 63 patients.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A256
-
218
Guarner-Argente C, Córdova H, Martínez-Pallí G et al.
Post-operative recovery after notes (transgastric, transcolonic and transvaginal) versus laparoscopy. A prospective and comparative study in a survival porcine model.
Gut.
2010;
59 (Suppl. III)
A349
-
219
Delius S von, Schorn A, Grimm M et al.
Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is sufficient for transgastric peritoneoscopy and results in an improved cardiopulmonary response (pressurepig study).
Endoscopy.
2010;
42 (Suppl. I)
A373
I. S. PapanikolaouMD
Hepatogastroenterology Unit
2nd Department of Internal Medicine
“Attikon” University General Hospital
University of Athens
Athens
Greece
Fax: +30-210-5326422
eMail: ispapn@hotmail.com
