Download PDF
Endoscopy 2011; 43(6): 477-483
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1256340
Original article
 
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Prospective, cross-over, single-center trial comparing oral double-balloon enteroscopy and oral spiral enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel vascular malformations

A.  May1 , H.  Manner1 , I.  Aschmoneit1 , C.  Ell1
  • 1Department of Internal Medicine II, HSK Wiesbaden (Teaching Hospital of the University of Mainz), Wiesbaden, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 3 August 2010

accepted after revision 31 January 2011

Publication Date:
24 March 2011 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

See also:

Commentaire de travail de A. May et al., pp. 477Endoscopy 2011; 43(06): 743-743
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291778

Background and study aims: Spiral enteroscopy is a new, promising rapid enteroscopy technique. A prospective cross-over study was carried out to compare this new method with the established technique of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE).

Patients and methods: From an initial group of 18 patients with suspected mid-gastrointestinal bleeding due to vascular malformations but no previous history of small-bowel or colonic surgery, 10 patients (mean age 69 years) completed the study. Patients underwent both enteroscopy techniques with an oral approach, in a randomized sequence. The deepest point reached during advancement in the first enteroscopy was marked with India ink. The primary end point of the study was the total examination time.

Results: For spiral enteroscopy, the mean examination time was significantly shorter than with DBE (43 minutes vs. 65 minutes; P = 0.007), as was the mean time required for advancement of the enteroscope to the deepest point (24 minutes vs. 43 minutes; P = 0.03). However, the median maximum insertion depth was greater in the DBE group than in the spiral enteroscopy group (310 cm vs. 250 cm; P = 0.004). In all cases in which DBE followed spiral enteroscopy, DBE passed the India ink mark by a mean of over 100 cm. When DBE was performed first, spiral enteroscopy was either unable to reach the mark or else unable to advance deeper into the small bowel. No severe complications occurred.

Conclusions: The results confirm that the new spiral enteroscopy technique reduces the examination time, although the insertion depth with DBE is at present superior.

References

  • 1 Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y et al. Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 216-220
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 May A, Nachbar L, Wardak A et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy: preliminary experience in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding or chronic abdominal pain.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 985-991
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sunada K et al. Clinical outcomes of double-balloon endoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of small-intestinal diseases.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;  2 1010-1016
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Ell C, May A, Nachbar L et al. Push-and-pull enteroscopy in the small bowel using the double-balloon technique: results of a prospective European multicenter study.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 613-616
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 May A, Nachbar L, Ell C. Double-balloon enteroscopy (push-and-pull enteroscopy) of the small bowel: feasibility and diagnostic and therapeutic yield in patients with suspected small bowel disease.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  62 62-70
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Heine G D, Hadithi M, Groenen M J et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, diagnostic yield, and complications in a series of 275 patients with suspected small-bowel disease.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 42-48
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Sun B, Rajan E, Cheng S et al. Diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of double-balloon enteroscopy in a large cohort of patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 2011-2015
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Zhong J, Ma T, Zhang C et al. A retrospective study of the application on double-balloon enteroscopy in 378 patients with suspected small-bowel diseases.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 208-215
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 May A, Nachbar L, Pohl J et al. Endoscopic interventions in the small bowel using double-balloon enteroscopy: feasibility and limitations.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;  102 527-535
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kuga R, Safatle-Ribeiro A, Ishida R K et al. Small bowel endoscopy using the double-balloon technique: four-year results in a tertiary referral hospital in Brazil.  Dig Dis. 2008;  26 318-323
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Pohl J, Blancas J M, Cave D et al. Consensus report of the 2nd International Conference on double balloon endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 156-160
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Tsujikawa T, Saitoh Y, Andoh A et al. Novel single-balloon enteroscopy for diagnosis and treatment of the small intestine: preliminary experiences.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 11-15
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Kawamura T, Yasuda K, Tanaka K et al. Clinical evaluation of a newly developed single-balloon enteroscope.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;  68 1112-1116
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Ramchandani M, Reddy D N, Gupta R et al. Diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of single-balloon enteroscopy: series of 106 cases.  J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  24 1631-1638
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Aktas H, de Ridder L, Haringsma J et al. Complications of single-balloon enteroscopy: a prospective evaluation of 166 procedures.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 365-368
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Frantz D J, Dellon E S, Grimm I et al. Single-balloon enteroscopy: results from an initial experience at a U.S. tertiary-care center.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;  72 422-426
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 May A, Färber M, Aschmoneit I et al. Prospective multicenter trial comparing push-and-pull enteroscopy with the single- and double-balloon techniques in patients with small-bowel disorders.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;  105 575-581
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Adler S N, Bjarnason I, Metzger Y C. New balloon-guided technique for deep small-intestine endoscopy using standard endoscopes.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 502-504
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Akerman P, Agrawal D, Cantero D et al. Spiral enteroscopy with the new DSB overtube: a novel technique for deep peroral small bowel intubation.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 974-978
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Judah J R, Draganov P V, Lam Y et al. Spiral enteroscopy is safe and effective for an elderly United States population of patients with numerous comorbidities.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;  8 572-576
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Domagk D, Bretthauer M, Lenz P et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation improves intubation depth in double-balloon enteroscopy: a randomized, controlled, double-blind trial.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 1064-1067
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M et al. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique: method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the enteroscopy technique using the Erlangen Endo-Trainer.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 66-70
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Akerman P. Severe complications of spiral enteroscopy in the first 1750 patients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 AB127-AB128
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Witkin A S, Fenkel J M, Infantolino A et al. Spiral enteroscopy in geriatric patients: retrospective review of a single-center experience.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;  71 AB
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Buscaglia J M, Dunbar K B, Okolo 3rd P I et al. The spiral enteroscopy training initiative: results of a prospective study evaluating the Discovery SB overtube device during small bowel enteroscopy (with video).  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 194-199
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Morgan D, Upchurch B R, Draganov P V et al. Spiral enteroscopy: prospective multicenter U.S. trial in patients with small bowel disorders.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;  72 992-998
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Despott E J, Hughes S, Marden P et al. First cases of spiral enteroscopy in the UK: let’s “torque” about it!.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 517
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Khashab M A, Lennon A M, Dunbar K B et al. A comparative evaluation of single-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy for patients with mid-gut disorders.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;  72 766-772
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Frieling T, Heise J, Sassenrath W et al. Prospective comparison between double-balloon enteroscopy and spiral enteroscopy.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 885-888
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Takano N, Yamada A, Watabe H et al. Single versus double balloon endoscopy for achieving total enteroscopy: a randomized controlled trial.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;  Jan 25 [Epub ahead of print]
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 Takayoshi S, Shiro O, Shinji T et al. Clinical outcome of patients who have undergone total enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;  71 AB 366
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Madisch A, Schmolders J, Brückner S et al. Less favorable clinical outcome after diagnostic and interventional double balloon enteroscopy in patients with suspected small-bowel bleeding?.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 731-734
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Gerson L B, Batenic M A, Newsom S L et al. Long-term outcomes after double-balloon enteroscopy for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  7 664-669
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Möschler O, May A D, Müller M K et al. Complications in double-balloon enteroscopy: results of the German DBE registry.  [in German.] Z Gastroenterol. 2008;  46 266-270
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Gerson L B, Tokar J, Chiorean M et al. Complications associated with double balloon enteroscopy at nine US centers.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  11 1177-1182
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Mensink P, Haringsma J, Kucharzik T et al. Complications of double balloon enteroscopy: a multicenter survey.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 613-615
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

A. MayMD, PhD 

Dept. of Internal Medicine II
HSK Wiesbaden

Ludwig-Erhard-Strasse 100
65199 Wiesbaden
Germany

Fax: +49-611-432418

Email: andrea.may@hsk-wiesbaden.de