Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262325
Classroom Acoustics
Publication History
Publication Date:
08 September 2010 (online)

ABSTRACT
Classrooms of the 21st century present learning and teaching challenges. The effects of classroom acoustics on student learning gains and teachers' vocal health present daily challenges. Understanding the impact of classroom acoustics and effective management strategies can increase learning gains and reduce the societal impact of teacher vocal health issues. Noise, reverberation, distance, directionality, and teacher–student interactions in the classroom can affect speech perception, comprehension, and academic achievement. The Classroom Acoustics Standard, although voluntary, provides a framework for school planning teams to implement positive acoustical strategies and standards that allow for good speech communication in the learning environment. Audiologists have resources available to assist school districts and facility planning groups toward improving acoustical conditions in learning spaces. Audiologists possess the knowledge and skills to provide information about the benefits of good classroom acoustics, evaluate educational acoustical environments, recommend modifications, and advocate for endorsement of the classroom acoustics standard.
KEYWORDS
Acoustics - reverberation - speech perception - critical distance - standard
REFERENCES
- 1 Litovsky R. Development of binaural audition and predictions for real-world environments. Proceedings of the Second International conference: A Sound Foundation through Early Amplification 2001. Chicago, IL; Phonak 2002: 25-35
- 2 Butler K. Auditory perceptual skills: their measurement and remediation with preschool and school-age children. Presented at: ASHA Convention November 1975 Washington, DC;
- 3 Dahlquist L. Classroom amplification: not just for the hearing impaired anymore. CSUN '98 Papers. http://Available at: www.csun.edu/cod/conf/1998/proceedings/csun98_124.htm Accessed July 14, 2010
- 4 General Accounting Office .Schools facilities: condition of America's schools. Available at: http://www.gao.gov/archive/1995/he95061.pdf Accessed July 14, 2010
- 5 U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics .Fast response survey system (FRSS), “Public school principals' perceptions of their school facilities: Fall 2005”. 2005; NCES 2008-011. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/frss/downloads.asp#FRSS13 Accessed July 14, 2010
- 6 Crum D, Matkin N. Room acoustics: the forgotten variable?. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1976; 7 106-110
- 7 Collaborative for High Performance Schools .Best Practices Manual. Available at: http://www.chps.net/dev/Drupal/node/39 Accessed July 14, 2010
- 8 Anderson K. The problem of classroom acoustics: the typical classroom soundscape is a barrier to learning. Semin Hear. 2005; 25 117-129
- 9 Bellis T. Assessment and Management of Central Auditory Processing Disorders in the Educational Setting: From Science to Practice. Clifton Park, NY; Thomsen Delmar Learning 2003: 51-137
- 10 Elliott L L. Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. J Acoust Soc Am. 1979; 66 651-653
- 11 Soli S, Sullivan J. Factors affecting children's speech communication in classrooms. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997; 101 S3070
- 12 Berg F, Blair J, Benson P. Classroom acoustics: the problem, impact, and solution. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1996; 27 16-20
- 13 Crandell C. Speech recognition in noise by children with minimal degrees of sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear. 1993; 14(3) 210-216
- 14 Nelson P. Children's need for favorable acoustics in schools. Presented at: the 146th ASA Meeting Austin, TX; November 2003
- 15 Papso C F, Blood I M. Word recognition skills of children and adults in background noise. Ear Hear. 1989; 10 235-236
- 16 Yacullo W S, Hawkins D B. Speech recognition in noise and reverberation by school-age children. Audiology. 1987; 26 235-246
- 17 Nelson P, Soli S. Acoustical barriers to learning: children at risk in every classroom. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2000; 31 356-361
-
18 Crandell C, Smaldino J.
Room acoustics for listeners with normal-hearing and hearing impairment . In: Valente M, Hosford-Dunn H, Roeser R Audiology: Treatment. New York, NY; Thieme 2000: 601-623 - 19 ASHA .Guidelines for Addressing Acoustics in Educational Settings. Rockville, MD; ASHA 2005
- 20 ASHA .Acoustics in Educational Settings: Position Statement. Rockville, MD; ASHA 2005
- 21 ASHA .Acoustics in Educational Settings: Technical Report. Rockville, MD; ASHA 2005
- 22 American Academy of Audiology .Position Statement on Classroom Acoustics. 2008
-
23 Crandell C, Smaldino J, Flexer C.
Speech perception in specific populations . In: Crandell C, Smaldino J, Flexer C Sound Field Amplification: Applications to Speech Perception and Classroom Acoustics. 2nd ed. Clifton Park, NY; Thomsen-Delmar Learning 2005: 57-71 - 24 Bess F H, Dodd-Murphy J, Parker R A. Children with minimal sensorineural hearing loss: prevalence, educational performance, and functional status. Ear Hear. 1998; 19 339-354
- 25 Niskar A S, Kieszak S M, Holmes A, Esteban E, Rubin C, Brody D J. Prevalence of hearing loss among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. JAMA. 1998; 279 1071-1075
- 26 Johnson C, Stein R, Broadway A, Markwalter T. “Minimal” high-frequency hearing loss and school-age children: speech recognition in a classroom. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1997; 28 77-85
- 27 Johnson C E. Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000; 43 144-157
- 28 Poissant S F, Whitmal III N A, Freyman R L. Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 119 1605-1615
- 29 Zeng F G, Liu S. Speech perception in individuals with auditory neuropathy. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2006; 49 367-380
- 30 Crandell C, Smaldino J. Classroom acoustics for children with normal hearing and with hearing impairment. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2000; 31 362-370
- 31 National Center for Educational Statistics. Language Minority School-Age Children .Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/programs/coe/2010/section1/indicator05.asp Accessed July 14, 2010
- 32 Flexer C, Millin J, Brown L. Children with developmental disabilities: the effects of sound field amplification in word identification. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1990; 21 177-182
- 33 Nober L, Nober E. Auditory discrimination of learning disabled children in quiet and classroom noise. J Learn Disabil. 1975; 8 656-659
- 34 Crandell C, Smaldino J. Speech perception in noise by children for whom English is a second language. Am J Audiol. 1996; 5(3) 47-51
- 35 Bradlow A R, Kraus N, Hayes E. Speaking clearly for children with learning disabilities: sentence perception in noise. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003; 46 80-97
- 36 Nelson P, Kohnert K, Sabur S, Shaw D. Classroom noise and children learning through a second language: double jeopardy?. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2005; 36 219-229
- 37 Stelmachowicz P G, Hoover B M, Lewis D E, Kortekaas R W, Pittman A L. The relation between stimulus context, speech audibility, and perception for normal-hearing and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000; 43 902-914
- 38 Schneider M. Do school facilities affect academic outcomes? National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities. Available at: http://www.edfacilities.org/pubs/outcomes.pdf
- 39 Finitzo-Hieber T, Tillman T W. Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. J Speech Hear Res. 1978; 21 440-458
- 40 Nábelek A K, Robinson P K. Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. J Acoust Soc Am. 1982; 71 1242-1248
- 41 Neuman A C, Hochberg I. Children's perception of speech in reverberation. J Acoust Soc Am. 1983; 73 2145-2149
- 42 Roy N, Merrill R, Thibeault S, Parsa R, Gray S, Smith E. Prevalence of voice disorders in teachers and the general population. J Speech Hear Res. 2004; 47 281-293
- 43 Titze I R, Lemke J, Montequin D. Populations in the U.S. workforce who rely on voice as a primary tool of trade: a preliminary report. J Voice. 1997; 11 254-259
- 44 Board on Infrastructure and the Constructed Environment .Review and Assessment of the Health and Productivity Benefits of Green Schools: An Interim Report. Washington, DC; National Academies Press 2006
- 45 American National Standards Institute .ANSI S12.60–2002 (R2009) American National Standard, acoustical performance criteria, design requirements and guidelines for schools. Melville, NY; Author 2009
- 46 Boothroyd A. Room acoustics and speech perception. Semin Hear. 2004; 25 155-166
-
47 Boothroyd A.
Modeling the effects of room acoustics on speech reception and perception . In: Crandell C, Smaldino J, Flexer C Sound Field Amplification: Applications to Speech Perception and Classroom Acoustics, 2nd ed. Clifton Park, NY; Thomson Delmar Learning 2005: 23-48 - 48 Siebein G. Understanding classroom acoustic solutions. Semin Hear. 2004; 25 141-154
- 49 Siebein G, Crandell C, Gold M. Principles of classroom acoustics: reverberation. Ed Aud Monograph. 1997; 5 32-43
-
50 Smurzynski J.
Acoustic foundations of signal enhancement and room acoustics . In: Chermak G, Musiek, F Handbook of (Central) Auditory Processing Disorder: Auditory Neuroscience and Diagnosis. San Diego, CA; Plural Publishing 2007: 51-73 -
51 Smaldino J, Crandell C, Kreisman B, John A, Kreisman N.
Room acoustics and auditory rehabilitation technology . In: Katz J Handbook of Clinical Audiology. 6th ed. Philadelphia, PA; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2009: 745-775 - 52 Maryland State Department of Education .Classroom Acoustics Guidelines. Baltimore, MD; Author 2006
- 53 Bradley J S, Sato H, Picard M. On the importance of early reflections for speech in rooms. J Acoust Soc Am. 2003; 113 3233-3244
- 54 Bradley J S. Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms. J Acoust Soc Am. 1986; 80 837-845
- 55 Lochner J, Burger J. The intelligibility of speech under reverberant conditions. Acustica. 1961; 11 195-200
- 56 Crandell C, Smaldino J. Classroom acoustics: understanding barriers to learning. Volta Review. 2001; 101 1-73
- 57 Siebein G W, Gold M A, Siebein G W, Ermann M G. Ten ways to provide a high-quality acoustical environment in schools. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2000; 31 376-384
-
58 Smaldino J, Crandell C, Kreisman B.
Classroom acoustic measurements . In: Crandell C, Smaldino J, Flexer C Sound Field Amplification: Applications to Speech Perception and Classroom Acoustics. 2nd ed. Clifton Park, NY; Thomson Delmar Learning 2005: 115-131 - 59 US Access Board .Counting the Costs of Noisy vs. Quiet Classrooms. Available at: http://www.quietclassrooms.org/ada/adahandout3.htm Accessed July 14, 2010
- 60 American National Standards Institute .ANSI S1.4–1983 (R 2006), American National Standard Specification for Sound Level Meters. Melville, NY; Author 2006
-
61 Kreisman B, Crandell C, Smaldino J, Kreisman N.
Measuring efficacy of sound field placement . In: Crandell C, Smaldino J, Flexer C Sound Field Amplification: Applications to Speech Perception and Classroom Acoustics. 2nd ed. Clifton Park, NY; Thomson Delmar Learning 2005: 212-213 - 62 Boothroyd A. Modeling classroom acoustics. 2006 Available at: http://www.arthurboothroyd.com
- 63 Smaldino J. Classroom acoustics: importance to successful listening and learning. Rockford, IL; Project REAL 2006 Available at: http://www.projectreal.niu.edu/projectreal/contact.shtml
- 64 International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) .Specifications for sound level meters (IEC 61672–1). Geneva, Switzerland; Author 2006
- 65 Berg F. Acoustics and Sound Systems in Schools. Clifton Park, NY; Thomsen Delmar Learning 1993
-
66 Crandell C, Smaldino J.
Acoustic measurements in classrooms . In: Crandell C, Smaldino J, Flexer C Sound-Field FM Amplification: Theory and Practical Applications. San Diego, CA; Singular 1995: 69-81 -
67 Boothroyd A.
Room acoustics and speech reception: a model and some implications . In: Fabry D, DeConde Johnson C ACCESS: Achieving Clear Communication Employing Sound Solutions—2003. Chicago, IL; Phonak 2004: 207-216 - 68 Bradley J, Sato H. Speech intelligibility test results for grades 1, 3 and 6 in children in real classrooms. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Congress on Acoustics; April, 2004 Kyoto, Japan; Available at: http://www.acousticalsurfaces.com/soundproofing_tips/html/Tu4.b1.2_Bradly_sato.htm Accessed July 14, 2010
Gail Gegg RosenbergM.S.
Audiologist, Lightspeed Technologies, Inc.
1705 Wharf Road, Sarasota, FL 34231
Email: g.rosenberg1@comcast.net