Ergometer Rowing With and Without Slides

Abstract

A rowing ergometer can be placed on a slide to imitate ‘on-water’ rowing. The present study examines i) possible differences in biomechanical and physiological variables of ergometer rowing with and without slides and ii) potential consequences on training load during exercise. 7 elite oars-women rowed in a randomized order in a slide or stationary ergometer at 3 predefined submaximal and at maximal intensity. Oxygen uptake was measured and biomechanical variables of the rowing were calculated based upon handle force (force transducer) and velocity/length (potentiometer) of the stroke. Stroke frequency was higher (%-difference between conditions) at each intensity level (1–11.4%, p<0.05) during slide compared to stationary rowing. Furthermore, at the 2 highest intensities a lower mean force (4.7–9.0%, p<0.05) and max force (3.2–10.6%, p<0.05) were observed on the slide ergometer. During maximal rowing no difference was seen in heart rate, mean oxygen uptake and R-value while maximal oxygen deficit was higher (30.8%, p<0.05) during slide rowing. In conclusion the biomechanical load is lower on a slide than on a stationary ergometer. However, as a training tool the slide ergometer seems just as demanding with regard to aerobic energy sources, and for anaerobic sources possibly even higher, compared with the stationary ergometer.

training load - biomechanical analysis - force - physiological analysis

References

• 1 Bangsbo J, Michalsik L, Petersen A. Accumulated O₂ deficit during intense exercise and muscle characteristics of elite athletes.  Int J Sports Med. 1993;  14 207-213
• 2 Bernstein IA, Webber O, Woledge R. An ergonomic comparison of rowing machine designs: possible implications for safety.  Br J Sports Med. 2002;  36 108-112
• 3 Colloud F, Bahuaud P, Doriot N, Champely S, Cheze L. Fixed versus free-floating stretcher mechanism in rowing ergometers: Mechanical aspects.  J Sports Sci. 2006;  24
• 4 Fukunaga T, Matsuo A, Yamamoto K, Asami T. Mechanical efficiency in rowing.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 1986;  55 471-475
• 5 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research.  Int J Sports Med. 2009;  30 701-702
• 6 Jensen K, Jorgensen S, Johansen L. A metabolic cart for measurement of oxygen uptake during human exercise using inspiratory flow rate.  Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002;  87 202-206
• 7 Jensen K. Performance assessment. In:, Secher NH, Volianitis S, (eds) Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science. Rowing. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 2007: 96-102
• 8 Karlson KA. Rib stress fractures in elite rowers – A case series and proposed mechanism.  Am J Sports Med. 1998;  26 516-519
• 9 Kleshnev V. Biomechanics. In:, Secher NH, Volianitis S, (eds). Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science. Rowing. 1st edition. Malden: Blackwell Publishing; 2007: 22-34
• 10 Mahony N, Donne B, O’Brien M. A comparison of physiological responses to rowing on friction-loaded and air-braked ergometers.  J Sports Sci. 1999;  17 143-149
• 11 Medbo JI, Mohn AC, Tabata I, Bahr R, Vaage O, Sejersted OM. Anaerobic capacity determined by maximal accumulated O-2 deficit.  J Appl Physiol. 1988;  64 50-60

Correspondence