Download PDF
Hebamme 2010; 23(4): 230-234
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1267805
Geburt
Geburtsverletzungen
© Hippokrates Verlag in MVS Medizinverlage Stuttgart GmbH & Co. KG

Die Versorgung von Geburtsverletzungen – aktueller Forschungsstand

Nurith Frövel1 , Tanja Brodsky1 , Antje Jung1
  • 1Hebammenschülerinnen, Berlin
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
20 December 2010 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Im Rahmen einer Forschungsarbeit untersuchten die Schülerinnen des Kurses 2007–2010 der Hebammenschule Berlin-Neukölln die Versorgung von Geburtsverletzungen. Welche Empfehlungen können anhand der aktuellen Fachliteratur gegeben werden? Welche Maßnahmen sind evidenzbasiert? Und wie sieht die geburtshilfliche Praxis in anderen europäischen Ländern aus?

Literatur

  • 1 Perveen F, Shabbir T. Perineal Repair: Comparison of suture materials and suturing techniques. Journal of Surgery Pakistan (international).  2009;  14(1)
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Gordon B, Mackrodt C, Fern E, Truesdale A, Ayers S, Grant A. The Ipswhich Childbirth Study: 1. A randomised evaluation of two stage postpartum perineal repair leaving the skin unsutured.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;  106 89-90
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 3 Lundquist M, Okson A, Nissen E, Norman M. Is It Necessary to Suture All Lacerations After a Vaginal Delivery.  Birth Volume. 2001;  27 (S 2) Pages 79-85 Published Online: 24 Dec 2001
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 4 Fleming V EM, Hagen S, Niven C. Does perineal suturing make a difference? The SUNS trial.  BJOG. 2003;  110 684-92 003
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 5 Kindberg S, Stehouwer M, Hvidman L, Henriksen T B. Postpartum perineal repair performed by midwives: a randomised trial comparing two suture techniques leaving the skin unsutured. 2007.  BJOG. 2008;  115(4) 472-9 18 271 883
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 6 Kindberg S, Klünder L, Strøm J, Henriksen T B. Ear accupuncture or local anaesthetics as pain relief during postpartum surgical repair: a randomised controlled trial.  BJOG. 2008;  19120322
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 7 Sanders J, Campbell R, Peters T J. Effectiveness of pain relief during perineal suturing.  BJOG. 2002;  109(9) 1066-1068
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Valenzuela P, Saiz Puente M S, Valero J L, Azorín R, Ortega R, Guijarro R. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second-degree perineal tears: a randomised controlled trial.  BJOG. 2009;  116(3) 436-41
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 9 Fleming N. Can the suturing method make a difference in perineal pain.  Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health. 1990;  35 (S 1) Pages 19-25 (January 1990)
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kettle C, Hills R K, Ismail K MK. Continuos versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second degree tears.  Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2009;  2
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 11 Morano S, Mistrangelo E, Pastorino D, Lijoi D, Costantini S, Ragni N. A randomized comparison of suturing techniques for episiotomy and laceration repair after spontaneous vaginal birth.  Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 2006;  13 (S 5) Pages 457-462
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 12 Ferreira S, de Almeida S, Riesco M LG. Randomized controlled clinical trial on two perineal trauma suture techniques in normal delivery.  Rev Latino-am Enfermagem. 2008;  16(2) 272-279
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 13 Isager-Sally L, Legarth J, Jacobsen B, Bostofte E. Episiotomy repair – immediate and long-term sequelae. A prospective randomized study of three different methods of repair.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;  93 420-425
    Search in Google Scholar

Anschrift der Autorin:

Nurith Frövel

Wilhelm-Busch-Straße 47

14612 Falkensee

Email: nfroevel@web.de