RSS-Feed abonnieren
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1268440
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
The Effect of Variable Gradients on Pacing in Cycling Time-Trials
Publikationsverlauf
accepted after revision October 08, 2010
Publikationsdatum:
16. Dezember 2010 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/sportsmed/201102/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0030-1268440-1.jpg)
Abstract
It has been reported that performance in cycling time-trials is enhanced when power is varied in response to gradient although such a mechanical pacing strategy has never been confirmed experimentally in the field. The aim of this study was, therefore, to assess the efficacy of mechanical pacing by comparing a constant power strategy of 255 W with a variable power strategy that averaged to 255 W over an undulating time-trial course. 20 experienced cyclists completed 4 trials over a 4 km course with 2 trials at an average constant power of 253 W and 2 trials where power was varied in response to gradient and averaged 260 W. Time normalised to 255 W was 411±31.1 s for the constant power output trials and 399±29.5 s for the variable power output trials. The variable power output strategy therefore reduced completion time by 12±8 s (2.9%) which was significant (p<0.001). Participants experienced difficulty in applying a constant power strategy over an undulating course which acted to reduce their time gain. It is concluded that a variable power strategy can improve cycling performance in a field time-trial where the gradient is not constant.
Key words
pacing - modeling - time-trial - cycling
References
- 1 Atkinson G, Brunskill A. Pacing strategies during a cycling time trial with simulated headwinds and tailwinds. Ergonomics. 2000; 43 1449-1460
- 2 Atkinson G, Davison R, Jeukendrup A, Passfield L. Science and cycling: current knowledge and future directions for research. J Sports Sci. 2003; 21 767-787
- 3 Atkinson G, Peacock O, Passfield L. Variable versus constant power strategies during cycling time-trials: prediction of time savings using an up-to-date mathematical model. J Sports Sci. 2007; 25 1001-1009
- 4 Atkinson G, Peacock O, Law M. Acceptability of power variation during a simulated hilly time trial. Int J Sports Med. 2007; 28 157-163
- 5 Bertucci W, Duc S, Villerius V, Pernin JN, Grappe F. Validity and reliability of the PowerTap mobile cycling powermeter when compared with the SRM Device. Int J Sports Med. 2005; 26 868-873
- 6 Chaffin ME, Berg K, Zuniga J, Hanumanthu VS. Pacing pattern in a 30-minute maximal cycling test. J Strength Cond Res. 2008; 22 2011-2017
- 7 Gordon S. Optimising distribution of power during a cycling time trial. Sports Eng. 2005; 8 81-90
- 8 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. International Journal of Sports Medicine – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research. Int J Sports Med. 2009; 30 701-702
- 9 Landau S, Everitt B. A Handbook of Statistical Analysis Using SPSS. London: Chapman & Hall; 2004
- 10 Lander PJ, Butterley RJ, Edwards AM. Self-paced exercise is less physically challenging than enforced constant pace exercise of the same intensity: influence of complex central metabolic control. Br J Sports Med. 2009; 43 789-795
- 11 Liedl MA, Swain DP, Branch JD. Physiological effects of constant versus variable power during endurance cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999; 31 1472-1477
- 12 Martin JC, Milliken DL, Cobb JE, McFadden KL, Coggan AR. Validation of a mathematical model for road cycling power. J Appl Biomech. 1998; 14 276-291
- 13 Palmer GS, Noakes TD, Hawley JA. Effects of steady-state versus stochastic exercise on subsequent cycling performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997; 29 684-687
- 14 Paton CD, Hopkins WG. Ergometer error and biological variation in power output in a performance test with three cycle ergometers. Int J Sports Med. 2006; 27 444-447
- 15 Swain DP. A model for optimizing cycling performance by varying power on hills and in wind. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1997; 29 1104-1108
- 16 UK National 10 Time Trial Results . Available at http://www.rttc.org.uk [Accessed 21st December 2009]
Correspondence
Patrick Cangley
University of Brighton
Chelsea School
Hillbrow
BN20 7SR Eastbourne
United Kingdom
Telefon: + 44/1372/273 163
Fax: + 44/1372/273 163
eMail: p.cangley@brighton.ac.uk