Failure of Interpositional Membrane to Prevent Recurrent Arthrofibrosis

ABSTRACT

Silicone has been used in numerous health care roles, from catheters to finger joint arthroplasties, with proven success. Its use as an interpositional membrane for the prevention of adhesions has been attempted in various anatomic sites with unpredictable results. We present a case report of a patient with recurrent arthrofibrosis requiring multiple operative procedures including manipulations under anesthesia, arthroscopies, and unicompartmental and eventual total knee replacement. After developing stiffness after total knee arthroplasty, the patient received placement of a silicone interpositional membrane with the goal of minimizing scar formation. Arthrofibrosis recurred, and only eventual removal of the membrane and correction of the underlying overstuffed patellofemoral compartment has allowed for maintained functional improvement in motion after 3 years.

KEYWORDS

Silicone - arthrofibrosis - membrane - total knee arthroplasty

REFERENCES

• 1 Colas A C, Curtis J. Silicone Biomaterials: History and Chemistry. In: Ratner B D, Hoffman A S, Schoen F J, Lemons J E, eds. Biomaterial Science. pp. 80–86. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004
• 2 Swanson A B. Disabling arthritis at the base of the thumb: treatment by resection of the trapezium and flexible (silicone) implant arthroplasty.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;  54 456-471
• 3 Swanson A B. Flexible implant arthroplasty for arthritic finger joints: rationale, technique, and results of treatment.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972;  54 435-455
• 4 Winkler P A, Herzog C, Weiler C, Krishnan K G. Foreign-body reaction to silastic burr-hole covers with seroma formation: case report and review of the literature.  Pathol Res Pract. 2000;  196 61-66
• 5 Rahman H, Fagg P S. Silicone granulomatous reactions after first metatarsophalangeal hemiarthroplasty.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;  75 637-639
• 6 Khoo C T. Silicone synovitis. The current role of silicone elastomer implants in joint reconstruction.  J Hand Surg [Br]. 1993;  18 679-686
• 7 Scranton Jr P E. Management of knee pain and stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 2001;  16 428-435
• 8 Daluga D, Lombardi Jr A V, Mallory T H, Vaughn B K. Knee manipulation following total knee arthroplasty. Analysis of prognostic variables.  J Arthroplasty. 1991;  6 119-128
• 9 Ritter M A, Stringer E A. Predictive range of motion after total knee replacement.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1979;  143 115-119
• 10 Harvey I A, Barry K, Kirby S P, Johnson R, Elloy M A. Factors affecting the range of movement of total knee arthroplasty.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;  75 950-955
• 11 Skutek M, Elsner H A, Slateva K et al.. Screening for arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of association with human leukocyte antigen.  Arthroscopy. 2004;  20 469-473
• 12 Gaine W J, Ramamohan N A, Hussein N A, Hullin M G, McCreath S W. Wound infection in hip and knee arthroplasty.  J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000;  82 561-565
• 13 Katz M M, Hungerford D S, Krackow K A, Lennox D W. Reflex sympathetic dystrophy as a cause of poor results after total knee arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 1986;  1 117-124
• 14 Furia J P, Pellegrini Jr V D. Heterotopic ossification following primary total knee arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 1995;  10 413-419
• 15 Noyes F R, Berrios-Torres S, Barber-Westin S D, Heckmann T P. Prevention of permanent arthrofibrosis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction alone or combined with associated procedures: a prospective study in 443 knees.  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000;  8 196-206
• 16 Magit D, Wolff A, Sutton K, Medvecky M J. Arthrofibrosis of the knee.  J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007;  15 682-694
• 17 Kim J, Nelson C L, Lotke P A. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of the complication and outcomes of revision.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;  86 1479-1484
• 18 Bong M R, Di Cesare P E. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty.  J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004;  12 164-171
• 19 Nicholls D W, Dorr L D. Revision surgery for stiff total knee arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 1990;  5(Suppl) S73-S77
• 20 Ries M D, Badalamente M. Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;  380 177-183
• 21 Barrack R L, Burak C. Patella in total knee arthroplasty.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;  389 62-73
• 22 Papagelopoulos P J, Sim F H. Limited range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: etiology, treatment, and prognosis.  Orthopedics. 1997;  20 1061-1065; quiz 1066–1067
• 23 Bengs B C, Scott R D. The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty.  J Arthroplasty. 2006;  21 650-655
• 24 Ritter M A, Pierce M J, Zhou H, Meding J B, Faris P M, Keating E M. Patellar complications (total knee arthroplasty). Effect of lateral release and thickness.  Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;  367 149-157
• 25 Pierson J L, Ritter M A, Keating E M et al.. The effect of stuffing the patellofemoral compartment on the outcome of total knee arthroplasty.  J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;  89 2195-2203
• 26 Minns R J, Muckle D S. Mechanical and histological response of carbon fibre pads implanted in the rabbit patella.  Biomaterials. 1989;  10 273-276