Histological Evaluation of Skeletonized Internal Thoracic Artery Using ForceTriad™[*]

Abstract

Background: The internal thoracic artery (ITA) is a useful graft for coronary artery bypass grafting. Skeletonization, a technique that uses an ultrasonic scalpel, is increasingly used. However, the cost of an ultrasonic scalpel is extremely high. The purpose of this study was to determine whether a new electrosurgical cautery device (ForceTriad™) is as effective as an ultrasonic scalpel. Methods: Bilateral ITAs were harvested from eight pigs using the skeletonizing technique. The ITA on one side was harvested with an ultrasonic scalpel and on the other side using the ForceTriad™. Macroscopic and histological examinations were performed in sixteen ITAs. Results: No significant differences in the time required for harvesting were observed. The macroscopic findings revealed no significant change in any of the samples. The histological findings showed that the degree of thermal injury was similar. The normal structure was maintained in all samples. The ForceTriad™ costs US$ 226.82 less per patient than the ultrasonic scalpel. Conclusion: The new electrosurgical cautery device ForceTriad™ was less expensive, but it was equally effective. It appears that skeletonization performed with the new device is equivalent to that performed with an ultrasonic scalpel.

Key words

cardiac - coronary artery bypass grafts surgery - CABG - histology

1 Presented at the 62nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, October 11–14, 2009, Yokohama, Japan

References

• 1 Institute for Laboratory Animal Research .Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press; 1996
• 2 Grondin C M, Campeau L, Lespérance J et al. Comparison of late changes in internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts in two consecutive series of patients 10 years after operation.  Circulation. 1984;  70 (3 Pt 2) I208-I212
• 3 Cameron A, Davis K B, Green G et al. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts–effects on survival over a 15-year period.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  25; 334 (4) 216-219
• 4 Loop F D, Lytle B W, Cosgrove D M et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events.  N Engl J Med. 1986;  2; 314 (1) 1-6
• 5 Parish M A, Asai T, Grossi E A et al. The effects of different techniques of internal mammary artery harvesting on sternal blood flow.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;  104 (5) 1303-1307
• 6 Seyfer A E, Shriver C D, Miller T R et al. Sternal blood flow after median sternotomy and mobilization of the internal mammary arteries.  Surgery. 1988;  104 (5) 899-904
• 7 Athanasiou T, Crossman M C, Asimakopoulos G et al. Should the internal thoracic artery be skeletonized?.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;  77 (6) 2238-2246
• 8 Lehtola A, Verkkala K, Järvinen A. Is electrocautery safe for internal mammary artery (IMA) mobilization? A study using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1989;  37 (1) 55-57
• 9 Calafiore A M, Vitolla G, Iaco A L et al. Bilateral internal mammary artery grafting: midterm results of pedicled versus skeletonized conduits.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;  67 (6) 1637-1642
• 10 De Paulis R, de Notaris S, Scaffa R et al. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting on superficial and deep sternal infection: The role of skeletonization.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;  129 (3) 536-543
• 11 Peterson M D, Borger M A, Rao V et al. Skeletonization of bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts lowers the risk of sternal infection in patients with diabetes.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;  126 (5) 1314-1319
• 12 Pevni D, Uretzky G, Mohr A et al. Routine use of bilateral skeletonized internal thoracic artery grafting: long-term results.  Circulation. 2008;  12; 118 (7) 705-712
• 13 Boodhwani M, Lam B K, Nathan H J et al. Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvest reduces pain and dysesthesia and improves sternal perfusion after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized, double-blind, within-patient comparison.  Circulation. 2006;  22; 114 (8) 766-773
• 14 Higami T, Yamashita T, Nohara H et al. Early results of coronary grafting using ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic arteries.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  71 (4) 1224-1228
• 15 Wendler O, Tscholl D, Huang Q et al. Free flow capacity of skeletonized versus pedicled internal thoracic artery grafts in coronary artery bypass grafts.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;  15 (3) 247-250
• 16 McCarus S D. Physiologic mechanism of the ultrasonically activated scalpel.  J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;  3 (4) 601-608
• 17 Lamm P, Juchem G, Weyrich P et al. The harmonic scalpel: optimizing the quality of mammary artery bypass grafts.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;  69 (6) 1833-1835
• 18 Thatte H S, Khuri S F. The coronary artery bypass conduit: I. Intraoperative endothelial injury and its implication on graft patency.  Ann Thorac Surg. 2001;  72 (6) S2245-S2252 discussion S2267–S2270
• 19 Verrier E D, Boyle Jr E M. Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery.  Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;  62 (3) 915-922
• 20 Yoshikai M, Ito T, Kamohara K et al. Endothelial integrity of ultrasonically skeletonized internal thoracic artery: morphological analysis with scanning electron microscopy.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;  25 (2) 208-211

1 Presented at the 62nd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery, October 11–14, 2009, Yokohama, Japan