ABSTRACT
Adult patients with bilateral cochlear implants report a significant gain in health-related quality of life relative to having a single cochlear implant. Gains are found in multiple domains—in this article, we focus on hearing and speech understanding. There are several factors that likely contribute to the hearing-related gain in quality of life. The provision of bilateral implants improves the probability that (1) if there are large between-ear differences in speech recognition, then the ear with the best recognition ability will be stimulated; (2) patients will benefit from the head shadow effect, which provides large gains in speech intelligibility; (3) patients will receive the relatively smaller benefits due to summation and squelch; and (4) patients will be able to better localize sound sources in the horizontal plane by using interaural-level difference cues. It is reasonable to suppose that these improvements in performance combine to reduce the stress that is associated with listening via electrical stimulation and thereby improve hearing-related quality of life.
KEYWORDS
Cochlear implant - binaural hearing - localization
REFERENCES
-
1
Bichey B G, Miyamoto R T.
Outcomes in bilateral cochlear implantation.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg.
2008;
138
(5)
655-661
-
2a
Noble W, Tyler R, Dunn C, Bhullar N.
Unilateral and bilateral and the implant-plus-hearing aid profile: comparing self assessed and measured abilities.
Int J Audiol.
2008;
47
(8)
505-514
-
2b
Gifford R H, Shallop J K, Peterson A M.
Speech recognition materials and ceiling effects: considerations for cochlear implant programs.
Audiol Neurootol.
2008;
13
(3)
193-205
-
3
Helms J, Müller J, Schön F et al.
Evaluation of performance with the COMBI40 cochlear implant in adults: a multicentric clinical study.
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec.
1997;
59
(1)
23-35
-
4 Dorman M F. Speech perception by adults with cochlear implants. In: Waltzman S B, Roland J T Cochlear Implants. New York, NY: Thieme; 2006: 193-204
-
5
Middlebrooks J C, Bierer J A.
Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: Coding of stimulus level and current level.
J Neurophysiol.
2002;
87
(1)
493-507
-
6
Henry B A, Turner C W, Behrens A.
Spectral peak resolution and speech recognition in quiet: normal hearing, hearing impaired, and cochlear implant listeners.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2005;
118
(2)
1111-1121
-
7
Litvak L M, Spahr A J, Saoji A A, Fridman G Y.
Relationship between perception of spectral ripple and speech recognition in cochlear implant and vocoder listeners.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2007;
122
(2)
982-991
-
8
Dorman M F, Gifford R H, Spahr A J, McKarns S A.
The benefits of combining acoustic and electric stimulation for the recognition of speech, voice and melodies.
Audiol Neurootol.
2008;
13
(2)
105-112
-
9
Koch D B, Soli S D, Downing M, Osberger M J.
Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation: prospective study in adults.
Cochlear Implants Int.
2010;
11
(2)
84-99
-
10
Litovsky R, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J, Sammeth C.
Simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation in adults: a multicenter clinical study.
Ear Hear.
2006;
27
(6)
714-731
-
11
Buss E, Pillsbury H C, Buchman C A et al.
Multicenter U.S. bilateral MED-EL cochlear implantation study: speech perception over the first year of use.
Ear Hear.
2008;
29
(1)
20-32
-
12
Ramsden R, Greenham P, O'Driscoll M et al.
Evaluation of bilaterally implanted adult subjects with the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.
Otol Neurotol.
2005;
26
(5)
988-998
-
13
Davis A, Haggard M, Bell I.
Magnitude of diotic summation in speech-in-noise tasks: performance region and appropriate baseline.
Br J Audiol.
1990;
24
(1)
11-16
-
14
Eapen R J, Buss E, Adunka M C, Pillsbury III H C, Buchman C A.
Hearing-in-noise benefits after bilateral simultaneous cochlear implantation continue to improve 4 years after implantation.
Otol Neurotol.
2009;
30
(2)
153-159
-
15
Dorman M F, Dahlstrom L.
Speech understanding by cochlear-implant patients with different left- and right-ear electrode arrays.
Ear Hear.
2004;
25
(2)
191-194
-
16
Wilson B S, Lawson D T, Muller J M, Tyler R S, Kiefer J.
Cochlear implants: some likely next steps.
Annu Rev Biomed Eng.
2003;
5
207-249
-
17 Wilson B, Dorman M. The design of cochlear implants. In: Niparko J K Cochlear Implants, Principals and Practices. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2009: 95-136
-
18
Fishman K E, Shannon R V, Slattery W H.
Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor.
J Speech Lang Hear Res.
1997;
40
(5)
1201-1215
-
19
Friesen L M, Shannon R V, Baskent D, Wang X.
Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implants.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2001;
110
(2)
1150-1163
-
20
Loizou P C, Dorman M, Tu Z.
On the number of channels needed to understand speech.
J Acoust Soc Am.
1999;
106
(4 Pt 1)
2097-2103
-
21 Lawson D T, Wilson B, Zerbi M, Finley C. Speech reception with bilateral cochlear implants and update on longitudinal studies. Fourth Quarterly Progress Report, NIH Project NOI-DC-8-2105, Neural Prosthesis Program. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 1999: 1-27
-
22
Akeroyd M A.
The psychoacoustics of binaural hearing.
Int J Audiol.
2006;
45
(Suppl 1)
S25-S33
-
23 Yost W, Hafter E. Lateralization. In: Gourevitch G, Yost W Directional Hearing. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag; 1987: 49-84
-
24 Grantham D W. Spatial hearing and related phenomena. In: Moore B Hearing. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1995: 297-345
-
25
Schleich P, Nopp P, D'Haese P.
Head shadow, squelch, and summation effects in bilateral users of the MED-EL COMBI 40/40 + cochlear implant.
Ear Hear.
2004;
25
(3)
197-204
-
26
Koenig W.
Subjective effects in binaural hearing.
J Acoust Soc Am.
1950;
22
(1)
61-62
-
27
van Hoesel R, Böhm M, Pesch J, Vandali A, Battmer R D, Lenarz T.
Binaural speech unmasking and localization in noise with bilateral cochlear implants using envelope and fine-timing based strategies.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2008;
123
(4)
2249-2263
-
28
Ricketts T A, Grantham D W, Ashmead D H, Haynes D S, Labadie R F.
Speech recognition for unilateral and bilateral cochlear implant modes in the presence of uncorrelated noise sources.
Ear Hear.
2006;
27
(6)
763-773
-
29
Mosnier I, Sterkers O, Bebear J P et al.
Speech performance and sound localization in a complex noisy environment in bilaterally implanted adult patients.
Audiol Neurootol.
2009;
14
(2)
106-114
-
30
Schön F, Müller J, Helms J.
Speech reception thresholds obtained in a symmetrical four-loudspeaker arrangement from bilateral users of MED-EL cochlear implants.
Otol Neurotol.
2002;
23
(5)
710-714
-
31 Gifford R, Dorman M, Brown C. Psychophysical properties of low-frequency hearing: implications for electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS). In: van de Heyning P, ed. Cochlear Implants and Hearing Preservation. Advances in ORL. 2010. 67: 51-60
-
32
Revit L J, Killion M C, Compton-Conley C L.
Developing and testing a laboratory sound system that yields accurate real-world results.
Hearing Rev.
2007;
In press
-
33 Kidd G J, Mason C R, Richards V M, Gallun F J, Durlach N I. Informational masking. In: Yost W A, Fay R R Auditory Perception of Sound Sources. New York, NY: Springer; 2008
-
34
Hawley M L, Litovsky R Y, Culling J F.
The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2004;
115
(2)
833-843
-
35
Loizou P C, Hu Y, Litovsky R et al.
Speech recognition by bilateral cochlear implant users in a cocktail-party setting.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2009;
125
(1)
372-383
-
36
Nopp P, Schleich P, D'Haese P.
Sound localization in bilateral users of MED-EL COMBI 40/40 + cochlear implants.
Ear Hear.
2004;
25
(3)
205-214
-
37
Laszig R, Aschendorff A, Stecker M et al.
Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Otol Neurotol.
2004;
25
(6)
958-968
-
38
van Hoesel R J, Tyler R S.
Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2003;
113
(3)
1617-1630
-
39
Litovsky R Y, Parkinson A, Arcaroli J.
Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users.
Ear Hear.
2009;
30
(4)
419-431
-
40
Grantham D W, Ashmead D H, Ricketts T A, Labadie R F, Haynes D S.
Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Ear Hear.
2007;
28
(4)
524-541
-
41
van Hoesel R J.
Exploring the benefits of bilateral cochlear implants.
Audiol Neurootol.
2004;
9
(4)
234-246
-
42
Seeber B U, Fastl H.
Localization cues with bilateral cochlear implants.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2008;
123
(2)
1030-1042
-
43
Tyler R S, Gantz B J, Rubinstein J T et al.
Three-month results with bilateral cochlear implants.
Ear Hear.
2002;
23
(1 Suppl)
80S-89S
-
44
Bernstein L R, Trahiotis C.
Lateralization of low-frequency, complex waveforms: the use of envelope-based temporal disparities.
J Acoust Soc Am.
1985;
77
(5)
1868-1880
-
45
Grantham D W, Ashmead D H, Ricketts T A, Labadie R F, Haynes D S.
Horizontal-plane localization of noise and speech signals by postlingually deafened adults fitted with bilateral cochlear implants.
Ear Hear.
2007;
28
(4)
524-541
-
46
Wightman F L, Kistler D J.
Headphone simulation of free-field listening. I: Stimulus synthesis.
J Acoust Soc Am.
1989;
85
(2)
858-867
-
47
Middlebrooks J C, Green D M.
Sound localization by human listeners.
Annu Rev Psychol.
1991;
42
135-159
-
48
Wightman F L, Kistler D J.
Headphone simulation of free-field listening. II: Psychophysical validation.
J Acoust Soc Am.
1989;
85
(2)
868-878
-
49
Wightman F L, Kistler D J.
Monaural sound localization revisited.
J Acoust Soc Am.
1997;
101
(2)
1050-1063
-
50
Shub D E, Carr S P, Kong Y, Colburn H S.
Discrimination and identification of azimuth using spectral shape.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2008;
124
(5)
3132-3141
-
51
Laback B, Majdak P, Baumgartner W D.
Lateralization discrimination of interaural time delays in four-pulse sequences in electric and acoustic hearing.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2007;
121
(4)
2182-2191
-
52
van Hoesel R J.
Observer weighting of level and timing cues in bilateral cochlear implant users.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2008;
124
(6)
3861-3872
-
53
Poon B B, Eddington D K, Noel V, Colburn H S.
Sensitivity to interaural time difference with bilateral cochlear implants: development over time and effect of interaural electrode spacing.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2009;
126
(2)
806-815
-
54
van Hoesel R J.
Sensitivity to binaural timing in bilateral cochlear implant users.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2007;
121
(4)
2192-2206
-
55
Francart T, Wouters J.
Perception of across-frequency interaural level differences.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2007;
122
(5)
2826-2831
-
56
Laback B, Pok S M, Baumgartner W D, Deutsch W A, Schmid K.
Sensitivity to interaural level and envelope time differences of two bilateral cochlear implant listeners using clinical sound processors.
Ear Hear.
2004;
25
(5)
488-500
-
57
Smith Z M, Delgutte B.
Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants.
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol.
2007;
8
(1)
134-151
-
58
Litovsky R Y, Jones G L, Agrawal S, van Hoesel R.
Effect of age at onset of deafness on binaural sensitivity in electric hearing in humans.
J Acoust Soc Am.
2010;
127
(1)
400-414
-
59
Hochmair I, Nopp P, Jolly C et al.
MED-EL Cochlear implants: state of the art and a glimpse into the future.
Trends Amplif.
2006;
10
(4)
201-219
-
60
Gantz B J, Turner C.
Combining acoustic and electrical speech processing: Iowa/Nucleus hybrid implant.
Acta Otolaryngol.
2004;
124
(4)
344-347
-
61
Gstoettner W, Kiefer J, Baumgartner W D, Pok S, Peters S, Adunka O.
Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation.
Acta Otolaryngol.
2004;
124
(4)
348-352
-
62
Kiefer J, Pok M, Adunka O et al.
Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study.
Audiol Neurootol.
2005;
10
(3)
134-144
-
63
Dunn C C, Perreau A, Gantz B, Tyler R S.
Benefits of localization and speech perception with multiple noise sources in listeners with a short-electrode cochlear implant.
J Am Acad Audiol.
2010;
21
(1)
44-51
Michael F DormanProfessor
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University
Tempe, AZ 85287-0102
eMail: mdorman@asu.edu
