Klienten mit Armparese – gezielte Behandlung in der Ergo- und Physiotherapie

Zusammenfassung

Viele Faktoren beeinflussen das Behandlungsergebnis von Patienten mit einer Armlähmung nach Schlaganfall. Es liegen Erkenntnisse aus der Forschung vor, die Physio- und Ergotherapeuten gezielt nutzen sollten, um motorisches Lernen optimal zu fördern. Einige dieser Aspekte stellt Sybille Roschka in diesem Artikel vor, wie zum Beispiel den bewussten Einsatz von Feedback und Shaping-Techniken. Des Weiteren lernen Sie in diesem Artikel zwei weniger verbreitete Behandlungsverfahren kennen: die Bewegungsbeobachtung und das simultan bilaterale Bewegungstraining. Beide Methoden können bei Patienten nach Schlaganfall eine wirksame Behandlungsoption darstellen.

Literatur

• 01 Binkofski F. Persönliche Mitteilung: August/September. 2010
• 02 Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P et al.. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand.  J Neurol Sci. 1995;  130 59-68
• 03 Bütefisch C M. Neurobiological bases of rehabilitation.  Neurol Sci. 2006;  27 18-23
• 04 Cauraugh J H, Summers J J. Neural plasticity and bilateral movements: a rehabilitation approach for chronic stroke.  Prog Neurobiol. 2005;  75 309-320
• 05 Celnik P, Webster B, Glasser D M et al.. Effects of action observation on physical training after stroke.  Stroke. 2008;  39 1814-1820
• 06 Chiviacowsky S, Wulf G. Feedback after good trials enhances learning.  Res Q Exerc Sport.. 2007;  78 40-47
• 07 Coupar F, Pollock A, van Wijk  F et al.. Simultaneous bilateral training for improving arm function after stroke.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev.. 2010;  4 Art. No.: CD006432 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006432.pub2
• 08 Cunningham C L, Stoykov M E, Walter C B. Bilateral facilitation of motor control in chronic hemiplegia.  Acta Psychol. 2002;  110 321-337
• 09 Ertelt D, Small S, Solodkin A et al.. Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke.  NeuroImage. 2007;  36 164-173
• 10 Ewan L M, Kinmond K, Holmes P S. An observation-based intervention for stroke rehabilitation: experiences of eight individuals affected by stroke.  Disabil Rehabil. 2010;  10 PMID 20455707
• 11 Feys H, de Weerdt W, Verbeke G et al.. Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: a 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial.  Stroke. 2004;  35 924-929
• 12 Franceschini M, Agosti M, Cantagallo A et al.. Mirror neurons: action observation treatment as a tool in stroke rehabilitation.  Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;  46 1-7
• 13 French B, Thomas L H, Leathley M J et al.. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke.  Stroke. 2009;  70 98-99
• 14 Garrison K A, Winstein C J, Aziz-Zadeh L. The mirror neuron system: a neural substrate for methods in stroke rehabilitation.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;  24 404-412
• 15 Granados C, Wulf G. Enhancing motor learning through dyad practice: contributions of observation and dialogue.  Res Q Exerc Sport. 2007;  78 197-203
• 16 Kollen B J, Lennon S, Lyons B et al.. The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence?.  Stroke. 2009;  40 89-97
• 17 Krakauer J W. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation.  Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;  19 84-90
• 18 Kromann C B, Jensen M L, Ringsted C. The effect of testing on skills learning.  Med Educ. 2009;  43 21-27
• 19 Lin K C, Chang Y F, Wu C Y et al.. Effects of constraint-induced therapy versus bilateral arm training on motor performance, daily functions, and quality of life in stroke survivors.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;  23 441-448
• 20 Lin K C, Chen Y A, Chen C L et al.. The effects of bilateral arm training on motor control and functional performance in chronic stroke: A randomized controlled study.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;  24 42-51
• 21 McCombe Waller S, Whitall J. Bilateral arm training: Why and who benefits?.  NeuroRehabil. 2008;  23 29-41
• 22 Mudie M H, Matyas T A. Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural networks damaged by stroke?.  Disabil Rehabil. 2000;  22 23-37
• 23 Müller K, Bütefisch C M, Seitz R J et al.. Mental practice improves hand function after hemiparetic stroke.  Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;  25 501-511
• 24 Murase N, Duque J, Mazzocchio R et al.. Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke.  Ann Neurol. 2004;  55 400-409
• 25 Nudo R J. Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioural recovery.  Stroke. 2007;  38 840-845
• 26 Piron L, Turolla A, Agostini M et al.. Motor learning principles for rehabilitation: a pilot randomized controlled study in poststroke patients.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;  24 501-508
• 27 Platz T, Winter T, Müller N et al.. Arm ability training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;  82 961-968
• 28 Platz T, van Kaick S, Mehrholz J et al.. Best conventional therapy versus modular impairment-oriented training for arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicenter randomized controlled trial.  http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19541918 Neurorehabil Neural Repair.. 2009;  23 706-716
• 29 Platz T, Roschka S. Rehabilitative Therapie bei Armparese nach Schlaganfall.  Neurol Rehabil. 2009;  15 81-116
• 30 Renner C, Hummelsheim H. Komplexes aufgabenspezifisches repetitives Training bei zentralmotorischen Störungen.  Neuroreha. 2009;  1 28-32
• 31 Rose D K, Winstein C J. Bimanual training after stroke: Are two hands better than one?.  Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;  11 20-30
• 32 Stefan K, Cohen L G, Duque J et al.. Formation of a motor memory by action observation.  J Neurosci. 2005;  25 9339-9346
• 33 Stoykov M E, Lewis G N, Corcos D M. Comparison of bilateral and unilateral training for upper extremity hemiparesis in stroke.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009;  23 945-953
• 34 Summers J J, Kagerer F A, Garry M T et al.. Bilateral and unilateral movement training on upper limb function in chronic stroke patients: a TMS study.  J Neurol Sci. 2007;  252 76-82
• 35 Taub E, Crago J E, Burgio L D et al.. An operant approach to rehabilitation medicine: Overcoming learned nonuse by shaping.  J Exp Anal Behav. 1994;  61 281-293
• 36 WHO .ICF-Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit. 2005 978-3-87360-047-8
• 37 Woldag H, Stupka K, Hummelsheim H. Repetitive training of complex hand and arm movements with shaping is beneficial for motor improvement in patients after stroke.  J Rehabil Med. 2010;  42 582-587
• 38 Wressle E, Eeg-Olofsson A M, Marcusson J et al.. Improved client participation in the rehabilitation process using a client-centred goal formulation structure.  J Rehabil Med. 2002;  34 5-11
• 39 Wu C Y. Persönliche Mitteilung. 21.09.2010
• 40 Wulf G, Lewthwaite R. Conceptions of ability affect motor learning.  J Mot Behav. 2009;  41 461-467