Planta Med 2011; 77 - P_112
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1273641

Impact of extraction processes on the 6-shogaol content in Zingiber officinale (Halia Penang) and its antiproliferative activities on human colorectal cancer cell lines (HT-29)

R Srinivasan 1, WH Wong 1, MR Pichika 1
  • 1School of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, International Medical University, No. 126, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Ginger has been reported to possess potential antiproliferative activities and it is mainly attributed to the presence of gingerols and shogaols. Recent studies show that 6-shogaol is most potent when compared to 6-gingerol [1]. It was also reported that 6-gingerol is converted to 6-shogaol during drying or long-term storage of ginger [2]. However, there are no reports on the impact of different extraction processes on the 6-shogaol content in ginger and its antiproliferative activities. In this study, the impact of extraction processes on the 6-shogaol content in Zingiber officinale (Halia Penang) and its antiproliferative activities on HT-29 cell lines was determined. Ginger rhizomes were collected from local market of Penang and dried at room temperature, in hot air oven (60°C and 80°C) and in microwave (110W, 550W and 1100W). Dried gingers were extracted with methanol and dichloromethane (DCM) in sonicator and concentrated in rotary evaporator. The 6-shogaol concentrations in extracts were determined using HPLC. Percent cell inhibitions (%) on HT-29 cells were determined using MTT assay. Among the 3 drying methods, the microwave drying offered the highest 6-shogaol content. Among the extraction solvents, methanol was found to be better solvent than DCM in extracting 6-shogaol. However, DCM extracts showed higher percent cell inhibition than that of methanol extracts. It was also found that there was no correlation between antiproliferative activities of ginger extracts and the corresponding 6-shogaol contents. Hence, the antiproliferative activities of ginger are not only due to 6-shogaol, but also due to other secondary metabolites.

References: [1] Sang S, Hong J, et al. (2009)J Agric Food Chem, 57 (22): 10645–50. [2] Zhang X, Iwaoka WT, et al. (1994)J Food Sci, 59(6): 1338–1340.