Twin Pregnancies Conceived Spontaneously and by ART (Assisted Reproductive Technologies) – a Retrospective Analysis and Review

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the perinatal and maternal outcome of our own cohort of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI and spontaneous conception to the respective available standards and findings in the current literature. Material and Methods: Perinatal and maternal data of 305 twin pregnancies conceived spontaneously and 74 pregnancies conceived by IVF/ICSI were compared. The following parameters were examined: maternal age, first parity, gestational age, Caesarean section rate, birth weight, sex constellation, umbilical arterial blood pH of the first and second child, maternal complications, fetal malformations, perinatal and neonatal mortality. These data were tested by retrospective statistical analysis (Fisher exact test, Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test). In addition, these parameters were also evaluated separately in dichorionic/diamniotic twins and monochorionic/diamniotic twins. Results: We found significant differences with higher maternal age, higher rate of first parity, an increased incidence of pre-eclampsia and a lower rate of SGA (VLBW) in the ART group and ART subgroup (di/di) compared to the SC group. Caesarean section rate, birth weight, arterial pH of the first and second twin, prematurity, rate of malformations, perinatal and neonate mortality, respectively, were not significantly different between the two groups. For prematurity < 37 weeks of gestation, a significantly higher frequency of the male/male sex constellation was observed. Conclusion: Actually, we are now able to more specifically counsel women conceiving by IVF/ICSI concerning maternal and perinatal outcome.

Zusammenfassung

Fragestellung: Ziel der Studie ist der Vergleich zwischen dem perinatologischen und maternalen Outcome unserer eigenen Zwillingsschafts-Kohorte nach ART (IVF/ICSI) und spontaner Konzeption (SC) im Vergleich zu den verfügbaren Standards und Suchergebnissen der vorhandenen Literatur. Material und Methoden: Verglichen wurden die perinatalen und maternalen Daten von 305 spontan konzipierten Zwillingsschwangerschaften zu 74 Geminigraviditäten nach IVF/ICSI. Die folgenden Parameter wurden untersucht: mütterliches Alter, Erstparität, Schwangerschaftwoche, Sectiorate, Geburtsgewicht, Geschlechtskonstellation, arterieller Nabelschnur-pH des 1. und 2. Kindes, maternale Komplikationen, fetale Fehlbildung, perinatale und neonatale Mortalität. Diese Daten wurden einer retrospektiven statistischen Analyse mittels Fisher-Exact-Test, Wilcoxon-Rangsummen-Test unterzogen. Weiterhin wurden diese Daten nach Dichorializität/Diamnializität und Monochorializität/Biamnializität aufgeschlüsselt. Ergebnisse: Wir fanden signifikante Differenzen mit höherem maternalen Alter, höherer Rate von Erstparität und einer ansteigenden Inzidenz von Präeklampsie sowie eine niedrigere Rate von SGA (VLBL) in der ART-Gesamtgruppe und ART-Subgruppe (Dichorializität/Diamnializität) im Vergleich zur SC-Gruppe. Die Sectiorate, das Geburtsgewicht, der umbilikale arterielle pH des 1. und 2. Zwillings, Frühgeburtlichkeit, Malformationsrate, perinatale und neonatale Mortalität zeigten keine signifikanten Unterschiede in der ART- oder SC-Gruppe. Für die Frühgeburtlichkeit < 37. SSW wurde eine höhere Frequenz der männl./männl. Geschlechtskonstellation beboachtet. Schlussfolgerung: Tatsächlich sind wir in der Lage, eine exaktere Beratung von Frauen nach IVF/ICSI-Konzeption hinsichtlich des maternalen und perinatalen Outcomes durchzuführen.

twins - ART - IVF/ICSI - preeclampsia - gender constellation

Zwillinge - künstliche Befruchtung - IVF/ICSI - Präeklamspie - Geschlechterkonstellation

References

• 1 Agustsson T, Geirsson R T, Mires G. Obstetrics outcome of natural and assisted conception twin pregnancies is similar.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1997;  76 45-49
• 2 Kupka M S, Bühler K, Dahncke W et al... Summary of the 2008 annual report of the German IVF registry.  J Reproduktionsmed Endokrinol. 2010;  7 34-38
• 3 Balci S, Engiz O, Alikasifoglu M et al.. Association of assisted reproductive technology with twinning and congenital anomalies.  Indian J Pediatr. 2008;  75 638-640
• 4 Baxi A, Kaushal M. Outcome of twin pregnancies conceived after assisted reproductive techniques.  J Hum Reprod Sci. 2008;  1 25-28
• 5 Boulet S L, Schieve L A, Nannini A et al.. Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproduction technology: a population-based study.  Hum Reprod. 2008;  23 1941-1948
• 6 Chen X K, Wen S W, Bottomley J et al.. In vitro fertilization is associated with an increased risk for preeclampsia.  Hypertens Pregnancy. 2009;  28 1-12
• 7 Dailey T L, Jayakrishnan A, Phipps M et al.. The contribution of maternal race/ethnicity and fetal sex to prematurity in twins.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;  201 68e1-68e6
• 8 Daniel Y, Ochshorn Y, Fait G et al.. Analysis of 104 twin pregnancies conceived with assisted reproductive technologies and 193 spontaneously conceived twin pregnancies.  Fertil Steril. 2000;  74 683-689
• 9 Delbaere I, Verstraelen H, Temmerman M. Characteristics of spontaneously conceived twins versus twins after assisted conception.  Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007;  10 (Suppl.) 21-22
• 10 Dhont M, De Sutter P, Ruyssinek G et al.. A Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999;  181 688-695
• 11 Duckitt K, Harrington D. Risk factors for pre-eclampsia at antenatal booking: systematic review of controlled studies.  Brit Med J. 2005;  330 565
• 12 Erez O, Mayer A, Shoham-Vardi I et al.. Primiparity, assisted reproduction, and preterm birth in twin pregnancies: a population based study.  Arc Gynecol Obstet. 2008;  277 311-317
• 13 Gunby J, Bissonnette F, Librach C et al.. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.  Fertil Steril. 2009;  91 1721-1730
• 14 Habli M, Lim F Y, Crombleholme T. Twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome: a comprehensive update.  Clin Perinatol. 2009;  36 391-416
• 15 Hamilton B E, Martin J A, Ventura S J. Birth: preliminary data for 2005.  Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2006;  55 1-18
• 16 Han W W, Kühne S M, Seufert R et al.. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI.  Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2009;  69 131-133
• 17 Hansen M, Colvin L, Petterson B et al.. Twins born following assisted reproductive technology: perinatal outcome and admission to hospital.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 2321-2331
• 18 Joy J, McClure N, Cooke I E. A comparison of spontaneously conceived twins and twins conceived by artificial reproductive technologies.  J Obstet Gynaecol. 2008;  28 580-585
• 19 Kallen B, Finnstrom O, Nygren K G et al.. In vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: risk for congenital malformations after different IVF methods.  Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2005;  73 162-169
• 20 Kor-anantakul O, Suwanrath C, Suntharasaj T et al.. Outcomes of multifetal pregnancies.  J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007;  33 49-55
• 21 Kozinszky Z, Zádori J, Orvos H et al.. Obstetric and neonatal risk of pregnancies after assisted reproductive technology: a matched control study.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003;  82 850-856
• 22 Kuwata T, Matsubara S, Ohkuchi A et al.. The risk of birth defects in dichorionic twins conceived by assisted reproductive technology.  Twin Res. 2004;  7 223-227
• 23 Lambalk C B, De Koning C B, Braat D D. The endocrinology of dizygotic twinning in the human.  Mol Cel Endocrinol. 1998;  145 97-102
• 24 Lambalk C B, van Hooff M. Natural versus induced twinning and pregnancy outcome: a Dutch nationwide survey of primiparous dizygotic twin deliveries.  Fertil Steril. 2001;  75 731-736
• 25 Liang R, Luo Y, Li G et al.. Perinatal outcome of twin pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive techniques and those conceived spontaneously.  Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2002;  37 327-330
• 26 Lynch A, McDuffie R, Stephens J et al.. The contribution of assisted conception, chorionicity and other risk factors to very low birthweight in a twin cohort.  BJOG. 2003;  110 405-410
• 27 Narine L H, Vezmar M, Sutija V G et al.. Mode of conception, placental morphology and perinatal outcome of twin gestations.  J Perinat Med. 2003;  31 99-104
• 28 Nyboe Andersen A, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S et al.. Assisted reproductive technology and intrauterine inseminations in Europe, 2005: results generated from European registers by ESHRE: ESHRE. The European IVF Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE).  Hum Reprod (Oxford, England). 2009;  1 1-2
• 29 Ochsenkühn R, Strowitzki T, Gurtner M et al.. Pregnancy complications, obstetric risks, and neonatal outcome in singleton and twin pregnancies after GIFT and IVF.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003;  268 256-261
• 30 Orvieto R, Ben-Rafael Z, Ashkenazi J et al.. Outcome of pregnancies derived from assisted reproductive technologies: IVF versus ICSI.  J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;  17 385-387
• 31 Reddy U M, Wapner R J, Rebar R W et al.. Infertility assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.  Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  109 967-977
• 32 Reefhuis J, Honein M A, Schieve L A et al.. National Birth Defects Prevention Study: assisted reproductive technology and major structural birth defects in the United States.  Hum Reprod. 2009;  24 360-366
• 33 Shebl O, Ebner T, Sommergruber M et al.. Risk in twin pregnancies after the use of assisted reproductive techniques.  J Reprod Med. 2008;  53 798-802
• 34 Shebl O, Ebner T, Sir A et al.. The role of mode of conception in the outcome of twin pregnancies.  Minerva Gynecol. 2009;  61 141-152
• 35 Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland .Lebendgeborene und Gestorbene, Frauen mit Mehrlingsgeburten. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland; 2009
• 36 Sunderam S, Chang J, Flowers L et al.. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): assisted reproductive technology surveillance – United States, 2006.  MMWR Surveill Summ. 2009;  58 1-25
• 37 Van Steirteghem A, Bonduelle M, Devroey P et al.. Follow-up of children born after ICSI.  Hum Reprod Update. 2002;  8 111-116
• 38 Verstraelen H, Gooetgeluk S, Derom C et al.. Preterm birth in twins after subfertility treatment: population based cohort study.  Brit Med J. 2005;  331 1173
• 39 Vitthala S, Gelbaya T A, Brison D R et al.. The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Hum Reprod Update. 2009;  15 45-55
• 40 Wright V C, Chang J, Jeng G et al.. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance – United States, 2004. MMWR. Surveillance summaries: Morbidity and mortality weekly report.  Surveillance summaries/CDC. 2007;  56 1-22
• 41 Wisanto A, Magnus M, Bonduelle M et al.. Obstetric outcome of 424 pregnancies after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.  Hum Reprod. 1995;  10 2713-2718
• 42 Yang M H, Ng S C, Ratnam S S et al.. Outcome of 143 pregnancies conceived by assisted reproductive techniques.  Asia Aceania J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992;  18 299-307
• 43 Zádori J, Kozinszky Z, Orvos H et al.. Birth weight discordance in spontaneous versus induced twins: impact on perinatal outcome.  Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;  21 85-88
• 44 Zaib-un-Nisa S, Ghazal-Aswad S, Badrinath P. Outcome of twin pregnancies after assisted reproductive techniques – a comparative study.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003;  109 51-54
• 45 Zuppa A A, Maragliano G, Scapillati M E et al.. Neonatal outcome of spontaneous and assisted twin pregnancies.  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2001;  5 68-72