Download PDF
Rofo 2011; 183(12): 1116-1122
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281821
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Klinische Anwendung der Flachdetektor-CT im Angio-OP

Clinical Application of Flat-Panel CT in the Angio SuiteK. A. Hausegger1 , M. Fürstner1 , M. Hauser1 , F. Smetana1 , T. Kau1
  • 1Röntgendiagnostisches Zentralinstitut, Landeskrankenhaus Klagenfurt
  • 2Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum Klagenfurt
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht: 15.11.2010

angenommen: 4.10.2011

Publication Date:
08 November 2011 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Einsatz von modernen Flachdetektoren in angiografischen C-Bogensystemen eröffnet die Möglichkeit, CT-ähnliche Untersuchungen direkt am Angiografietisch zu akquirieren. In dieser Übersichtsarbeit werden nach einer kurzen Beschreibung der Prinzipien der Datenakquisition bei der Flachdetektor-CT(FD-CT) mit deren Vorteilen und Limitationen im Vergleich zur Mehrzeilenspiral-CT (MSCT) die am besten etablierten und evaluierten Anwendungspektren der FD-CT beschrieben. Insbesondere bei neurointerventionellen Eingriffen ist die FD-CT zu einer wichtigen ergänzenden Bildgebungsmethode geworden. Aber auch bei Embolisationen, besonders von Lebertumoren und bei muskuloskelettalen Eingriffen hat sich die FD-CT als aussagekräftige Untersuchung erwiesen. Bei peripheren vaskulären Eingriffen und bei Stent-Graft-Prozeduren kann die FD-CT wichtige Zusatzinformationen bei komplizierten Fällen und beim Komplikationsmanagement liefern. Insgesamt ist das Anwendungsspektrum der FD-CT weit gefächert und hängt nicht zuletzt vom Einfallsreichtum des Untersuchers ab. Es darf jedoch nicht außer Acht gelassen werden, dass durch die FD-CT eine zusätzliche Strahlenbelastung entsteht, die bei grober Abschätzung derzeit zumindest der Strahlenbelastung einer normalen MSCT-Spirale der interessierenden Region entspricht.

Abstract

The introduction of flat-panel detectors in modern angiographic C-arm systems makes it possible to acquire CT-like images in the angiographic suite (flat-panel CT; FD-CT). In this review, after a short technical introduction of FD-CT including the discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of this new imaging modality, the most commonly and best evaluated indications for FD-CT will be described. FD-CT has become an important adjunctive imaging modality in neurointerventional procedures and embolizations, especially during liver embolization. Another attractive indication for FD-CT is musculoskeletal interventions. FD-CT may provide important additional information in complicated peripheral vascular interventions and stent-graft procedures. FD-CT has a broad spectrum of possible applications, which finally depends on the experience and innovative thinking of the operator. However, it has to be kept in mind that FD-CT causes additional radiation exposure. Roughly, it can be assumed that currently one FD-CT sequence causes at least the same radiation exposure as one spiral CT sequence of the corresponding body region.

Key words

brain - aorta - CT - CT spiral - embolization - interventional procedures - flat-panel CT

Literatur

  • 1 Kalender W A, Kyriakou Y. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT).  Eur Radiol. 2007;  17 2767-2779
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Orth R C, Wallace M J, Kuo M D. C-arm Cone Beam CT: General principles and technical considerations for use in interventional radiology.  J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;  19 814-820
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Mori S, Endo M, Komatsu S et al. A combination-weighted Feldkamp-based reconstruction algorithsm for cone-beam CT.  Phy Med Biol. 2006;  51 3953-3965
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Wallace M J, Kuo M D, Glaiberman C et al. Three-dimensional C-arm cone-beam CT: Applications in the interventional suite.  J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2008;  19 799-813
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Kyriakou Y, Richter G, Dörfer A et al. Neuroradiologic applications with routine C-arm flat panel detector CT: evalutation of patient dose measurements.  Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;  29 1930-1936
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Heran N S, Song K J, Namba K et al. The utility of DynaCT in neuroendovascular procedures.  Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;  27 330-332
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Doelken M, Struffert T, Richter G et al. Flat-panel detector volumetric CT for visualization of subarachnoid hemorrhage and ventricles: preliminary results compared to conventional CT.  Neuroradiology. 2008;  50 517-523
    Google Scholar
  • 8 Psychogios M N, Buhk J H, Schramm P et al. Feasibility of angiographic CT in peri-interventional diagnostic imaging: A comparative study with multidetector CT.  Am J Neurolradiol. 2010;  31 1226-1231
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Arakawa H, Marks M P, Do H M et al. Experimental study of intracranial hematoma detection with flat panel detector C-arm CT.  Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;  29 766-772
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Struffert T, Richter G, Engelhorn T. Visualisation of intracerebral hemorrhage with flat-detector CT compared to multislice CT: results in 44 cases.  Eur Radiol. 2009;  19 619-625
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Struffert T, Eyupoglu I Y, Huttner H B et al. Clinical evaluation of flat-panel detector compared with multislice tomography in 65 patients with intracranial hemorrhage: initial clinical results.  J Neurosurg. 2010;  113 901-907
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Richter G, Engelhorn T, Struffert T et al. Flat panel detector angiographic CT for stent- assisted coil embolization of broad-based cerebral aneurysms.  Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;  28 1902-1908
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Ebrahimi N, Claus B, Lee C Y et al. Stent conformity in curved vascular models with simulated aneurysm necks using flat panel CT: an in-vitro study.  Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;  28 823-829
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Ahmed A S, Zellerhoff M, Strother C M et al. C-arm CT measurement in cerebral blood volume: an experimental study in canines.  Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;  30 917-922
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Struffert T, Deuerling-Zheng Y, Kloska S et al. Flat detector CT in the evaluation of brain parenchyma, intracranial vasculature, and cerebral blood volume: A pilot study in patients with acute symptoms of cerebral ischemia.  Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;  31 1462-1469
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Liapi E, Hong E, Georgiades C S et al. Three-dimensional rotational angiography: Introduction of an adjunctive tool for successful transarterial chemoembolization.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005;  16 1241-1245
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Virmani S, Ryu R K, Sato K T et al. Effect of C-arm angiographic CT on transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of liver tumors.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;  18 1305-1309
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Kakeda S, Korogi Y, Ohnari N et al. Usefulness of cone-beam volume CT with flat panel detectors in conjunction with catheter angiography for transcatheter arterial embolization.  J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007;  18 1508-1516
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Miyayma S, Yamashiro M, Okuda M et al. Usefulness of cone-beam computed tomography during ultraselective transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for small hepatocellular carinomas that cannot be demonstrated on angiography.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;  32 255-264
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Jeon U B, Lee J W, Choo K S et al. Iodized oil uptake assessment with cone-beam CT in chemoembolization of small hepatocellular carcinomas.  World J Gastroenterol. 2009;  46 5833-5837
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Reichardt B, Sarwar A, Bartling S H et al. Musculoskeletal applications of flat-panel volume CT.  Skeletal Radiol. 2008;  37 1069-1076
    Google Scholar
  • 22 Pedicelli A, Rollo M, Piano M et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty with high quality rotational angiographic unit.  Eur J Radiol. 2009;  69 289-295
    Google Scholar
  • 23 Kang S E, Lee J W, Kim H J et al. Percutaneous sacroplasty with the use of C-arm flat-panel detector CT: technical feasibility and clinical outcome.  Skeletal Radiol. 2010;  ;Epub ahead of print
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Braak S J, Strijen M J, Leersum van M et al. Real-time 3D fluoroscopy guidance during needle interventions: technique, accuracy and feasibility.  Am J Roentgenol. 2010;  194 445-451
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Penzkofer T, Isfort P, Bruners P et al. Robot arm based flat panel CT-guided electromagnetic tracked spine interventions: phantom and animal model experiments.  Eur Radiol. 2010;  20 2650-2662
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Kau T, Rabitsch E, Celedin S et al. Feasibility and potentional value of flat-panel detector based computed tomography in myelography after spine surgery.  J Neurosurg spine. 2009;  10 66-72
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Buhk van J H, Elolf E, Jacob D et al. A comparison of angiographic CT and multisection CT in lumbar myelographic imaging.  Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;  29 442-446
    Google Scholar
  • 28 Phan C M, Macklin E A, Bredella M A et al. Trabecular structure analysis using C-arm CT: comparison with MDCT and flat-panel volume CT.  Skeletal Radiol. 2010;  Epub ahead of print
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Schuman T A, Noble J H, Wright C G et al. Anatomic verification of a novel method for precise intrascalar localization of cochlear implant electrodes in adult temporal bones using clinically available computed tomography.  Larygoscope. 2010;  ; Epub ahead of print
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Rabitsch E, Celedin S, Kau T et al. Flachdetektor-CT als ergänzende Untersuchung bei der endoluminalen Behandlung von thorakalen und abdominellen Aortenaneurysmen – Erste klinische Erfahrungen.  Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2008;  180 127-133
    Google Scholar
  • 31 Biasi L, Ali T, Hinchliffe R et al. Intraoperative DynaCT detection and immediate correction of a type Ia endoleak following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.  Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;  32 535-538
    Google Scholar
  • 32 Binkert C A, Alencar H, Singh J et al. Translumbar type II endoleak repair using angiographic CT.  J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;  17 1349-1353
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Iwazawa J, Ohue S, Abe H et al. Visualization of gastric varices using angiographic C-arm CT during retrograde transvenous sclerotherapy.  Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2010;  20 39-41
    Google Scholar

Prof. Dr. Klaus Hausegger

Röntgendiagnostisches Zentralinstitut, Landeskrankenhaus Klagenfurt

St. Veiter Strasse 47

9020 Klagenfurt

Österreich

Phone:  ++ 43/4 63/53 82 47 03

Fax:  ++ 43/4 63/53 82 31 85

Email: klaus.hausegger@lkh-klu.at