Int J Sports Med 2011; 32(11): 845-850
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1283178
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Traditional Maximal Lactate Steady State Test versus the 5×2000 m Test

A. Legaz-Arrese
1   Section of Physical Education and Sports, University of Zaragoza, Spain
,
L. E. Carranza-García
2   Faculty of Sports Organization, Autonomous University of Nuevo Leon, San Nicolás de los Garza, Mexico
,
E. Serrano-Ostáriz
3   Fisiatría y Enfermería, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain
,
J. M. González-Ravé
4   Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Castilla la Mancha, Toledo, Spain
,
N. Terrados
5   Unidad Regional de Medicina del deporte del Principado de Asturias, Fundación Deportiva Municipal de Avilés, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 25 May 2011

Publication Date:
19 October 2011 (online)

Abstract

Here, we compared the maximal lactate steady state velocity (vMLSS) estimated from a single-visit protocol (v5×2000) to the traditional multi-day protocol (vMLSS). Furthermore, we determined whether there was a lactate steady state during the time limits (Tlim) at vMLSS or v5×2000. Eight runners completed a half marathon (HM), the traditional protocol to determine the vMLSS and the 5×2000 m test in a randomised order, and a Tlim at vMLSS and at v5×2000 in a randomised order. The vMLSS (13.56±0.90 km·h − 1) was higher than the v5×2000 (12.93±0.90 km·h − 1, p=0.001) and comparable to the vHM (13.34±0.75 km·h − 1). The vMLSS (r=0.83) and the v5×2000 (r=0.91) were associated with the vHM but were not indicative of the competition pace. The Tlim at vMLSS (64±15 min) was lower than the Tlim at v5×2000 (94±21 min) and the HM time (95±5 min). In both Tlim, lactate was lower at 45 min than upon finishing the effort and was predictive of its duration (p<0.05). Our results indicate that the 5×2000 m test can be equally useful to assess runners as the traditional MLSS protocol and that there is no lactate steady state during the Tlim at vMLSS or at v5×2000.

 
  • References

  • 1 Baron B, Dekerle J, Depretz S, Lefevre T, Pelayo P. Self selected speed and maximal lactate steady state speed in swimming. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2005; 45: 1-6
  • 2 Baron B, Dekerle J, Robin S, Neviere R, Dupont L, Matran R, Vanvelcenaher J, Robin H, Pelayo P. Maximal lactate steady state does not correspond to a complete physiological steady state. Int J Sports Med 2003; 24: 582-587
  • 3 Baron B, Noakes TD, Dekerle J, Moullan F, Robin S, Matran R, Pelayo P. Why does exercise terminate at the maximal lactate steady state intensity?. Br J Sports Med 2008; 42: 828-33 Erratum in: Br J Sports Med 2009; 43: 310-311
  • 4 Beneke R. Methodological aspects of maximal lactate steady state-implications for performance testing. Eur J Appl Physiol 2003; 89: 95-99
  • 5 Beneke R, von Duvillard SP. Determination of maximal lactate steady state response in selected sports events. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1996; 28: 241-246
  • 6 Billat V, Dalmay F, Antonini MT, Chassain AP. A method for determining the maximal steady state of blood lactate concentration from two levels of submaximal exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 1994; 69: 196-202
  • 7 Billat VL, Sirvent P, Py G, Koralsztein JP, Mercier J. The concept of maximal lactate steady state: a bridge between biochemistry, physiology and sport science. Sports Med 2003; 33: 407-426
  • 8 Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 377-381
  • 9 Ceci R, Hassmén P. Self-monitored exercise at three different RPE intensities in treadmill vs. field running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 732-738
  • 10 Crewe H, Tucker R, Noakes TD. The rate of increase in rating of perceived exertion predicts the duration of exercise to fatigue at a fixed power output in different environmental conditions. Eur J Appl Physiol 2008; 103: 569-577
  • 11 Denadai BS, Gomide EB, Greco CC. The relationship between onset of blood lactate accumulation, critical velocity, and maximal lactate steady state in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 2005; 19: 364-368
  • 12 Eston RG, Faulkner JA, Mason EA, Parfitt G. The validity of predicting maximal oxygen uptake from perceptually regulated graded exercise tests of different durations. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006; 97: 535-541
  • 13 Farrell PA, Wilmore JH, Coyle EF, Billing JE, Costill DL. Plasma lactate accumulation and distance running performance. Med Sci Sports 1979; 11: 338-344
  • 14 Harnish CR, Swensen TC, Pate RR. Methods for estimating the maximal lactate steady state in trained cyclists. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1052-1055
  • 15 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
  • 16 Jones AM, Doust JHA. 1% treadmill grade most accurately reflects the energetic cost of outdoor running. J Sports Sci 1996; 14: 321-327
  • 17 Kilding AE, Jones AM. Validity of a single-visit protocol to estimate the maximum lactate steady state. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37: 1734-1740
  • 18 Kong PW, Candelaria NG, Tomaka J. Perception of self-selected running speed is influenced by the treadmill but not footwear. Sports Biomech 2009; 8: 52-59
  • 19 Kuphal KE, Potteiger JA, Frey BB, Hise MP. Validation of a single-day maximal lactate steady state assessment protocol. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2004; 44: 132-140
  • 20 Legaz Arrese A, Munguía Izquierdo D, Serveto Galindo JR. Physiological measures associated with marathon running performance in high-level male and female homogeneous groups. Int J Sports Med 2006; 27: 289-295
  • 21 Leibar X, Terrados N. Un approccio biomedico alla corsa di maratona. Revista di Cultura Sportiva/SdS 1996; 35: 43-51
  • 22 Navarro F, Legaz Arrese A. Características fisiológicas de los maratonianos de elite (II): Umbral anaeróbico. Revista de Entrenamiento Deportivo 1998; 12: 25-28
  • 23 Noakes TD, St Clair Gibson A, Lambert EV. From catastrophe to complexity: a novel model of integrative central neural regulation of effort and fatigue during exercise in humans: summary and conclusions. Br J Sports Med 2005; 39: 120-124
  • 24 Nummela A, Hämäläinen I, Rusko H. Comparison of maximal anaerobic running tests on a treadmill and track. J Sports Sci 2007; 25: 87-96
  • 25 Palmer AS, Potteiger JA, Nau KL, Tong RJA. 1-day maximal lactate steady-state assessment protocol for trained runners. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1999; 31: 1336-1341
  • 26 Philp A, Macdonald AL, Carter H, Watt PW, Pringle JS. Maximal lactate steady state as a training stimulus. Int J Sports Med 2008; 29: 475-479
  • 27 Riley PO, Dicharry J, Franz J, Della Croce U, Wilder RP, Kerrigan DC. A kinematics and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40: 1093-1100
  • 28 Smith CG, Jones AM. The relationship between critical velocity, maximal lactate steady-state velocity and lactate turnpoint velocity in runners. Eur J Appl Physiol 2001; 85: 19-26
  • 29 Sproule J. Running economy deteriorates following 60 min of exercise at 80% VO2max. Eur J Appl Physiol 1998; 77: 366-371
  • 30 Vobejda C, Fromme K, Samson W, Zimmermann E. Maximal constant heart rate–a heart rate based method to estimate maximal lactate steady state in running. Int J Sports Med 2006; 27: 368-372