Osseointegrated Implant Applications in Cosmetic and Functional Skull Base Rehabilitation

ABSTRACT

This study discusses the indications, outcomes, and complications in patients that underwent osseointegrated implantation for skull base rehabilitation. We conducted a retrospective review of eight patients with skull base defects who had undergone implantation of a facial prosthetic retention device ± bone-anchored hearing aid at a tertiary academic referral center. Descriptive analysis of applications, techniques, outcomes, and complications were reviewed. The majority of patients were males (n = 6) with previously diagnosed skull base malignancy (n = 5) with an average age of 46 (range, 14 to 77). All patients received an implanted facial prosthetic device either for an aural (n = 7) or orbital (n = 1) prosthesis. There were only two complications that included infection (n = 1) and implant extrusion (n = 1). Osseointegrated implantation of abutments for anchoring prosthetic devices in patients for skull base rehabilitation provides an excellent cosmetic option with minimal complications.

KEYWORDS

Craniofacial implants - facial prosthesis - skull base - bone-anchored hearing aid - rehabilitation

REFERENCES

• 1 Brånemark P I, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson B O, Lindström J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies.  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;  3 (2) 81-100
• 2 Tjellström A, Håkansson B. The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995;  28 (1) 53-72
• 3 Reyes R A, Tjellström A, Granström G. Evaluation of implant losses and skin reactions around extraoral bone-anchored implants: A 0- to 8-year follow-up.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;  122 (2) 272-276
• 4 Schoen P J, Raghoebar G M, van Oort R P et al.. Treatment outcome of bone-anchored craniofacial prostheses after tumor surgery.  Cancer. 2001;  92 (12) 3045-3050
• 5 Wilkes G H, Wolfaardt J F. Osseointegrated alloplastic versus autogenous ear reconstruction: criteria for treatment selection.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;  93 (5) 967-979
• 6 Granström G. Craniofacial osseointegration.  Oral Dis. 2007;  13 (3) 261-269
• 7 Cass S P, Mudd P A. Bone-anchored hearing devices: Indications, outcomes, and the linear surgical technique.  Oper Tech Otolaryngol--Head Neck Surg. 2010;  21 197-206
• 8 Brent B. Auricular repair with autogenous rib cartilage grafts: two decades of experience with 600 cases.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;  90 (3) 355-374 discussion 375-376
• 9 Granström G, Tjellström A, Brånemark P-I. Osseointegrated implants in irradiated bone: a case-controlled study using adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;  57 (5) 493-499
• 10 Marx R E, Johnson R P. Studies in the radiobiology of osteoradionecrosis and their clinical significance.  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1987;  64 (4) 379-390
• 11 Granström G. Osseointegration in irradiated cancer patients: an analysis with respect to implant failures.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005;  63 (5) 579-585
• 12 Donoff R B. Treatment of the irradiated patient with dental implants: the case against hyperbaric oxygen treatment.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;  64 (5) 819-822
• 13 Granström G. Placement of dental implants in irradiated bone: the case for using hyperbaric oxygen.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;  64 (5) 812-818