“Waiting on the Words”: Procedures and Outcomes of a Drama Class for Individuals with Aphasia

ABSTRACT

Drama therapy offers an authentic medium through which people with aphasia can interact and share their experiences. We describe the rationale and procedures of a drama class, informed by the principles and practices of drama therapy, in which individuals with chronic aphasia conceptualized, wrote, and produced a play addressing their experiences of having, living with, and coping with the effects of aphasia. Sessions were cofacilitated by a speech-language pathologist and a drama therapist. We describe the drama activities and techniques in each of four distinct stages of a drama therapy process through which the group transitioned. We also summarize patient-reported outcomes of a representational group of seven participants. Subscales of the Burden of Stroke Scale and the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia were administered before and after participation in the 18-week class. Means, standard deviations, and effect sizes were computed. Results indicated perceived improvements in both communication and mood.

KEYWORDS

Aphasia - drama therapy - group therapy - rehabilitation - patient-reported outcomes

REFERENCES

• 1 LeDorze G, Brassard C. A description of the consequences of aphasia on aphasic persons and their relatives and friends based on the WHO model of chronic diseases.  Aphasiology. 1995;  9 239-255
• 2 Parr S. Coping with aphasia: conversations with 20 aphasic people.  Aphasiology. 1994;  8 457-466
• 3 LPAA Project Group (in alphabetical order: Chapey R, Duchan JF, Elman RJ, Garcia LJ, Kagan A, Lyon J, Simmons-Mackie, N). Life participation approach to aphasia: a statement of values for the future. Available at: http://www.asha.org/public/speech/disorders/LPAA.htm Accessed December 10, 2010
• 4 National Association of Drama Therapy. What is drama therapy?. Available at: http://www.nadt.org/faqs.htm Accessed December 10, 2010
• 5 Johnson D R, Emunah R. Current Approaches in Drama Therapy. 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 2009
• 6 Cote I, Getty L, Gaulin R. Aphasic theatre or theatre boosting self-esteem. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies with ArtAbilitation, Maia, Portugal 2008. Available at: http://www.icdvrat.reading.ac.uk/2008/papers/ICDVRAT2008_S05_N01_Cote_Getty_Gaulin.pdf Accessed December 10, 2010
• 7 Sternberg P, Garcia A. Sociodrama. In: Johnson D R, Emunah R, eds. Current Approaches in Drama Therapy. 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 2009: 424-444
• 8 Byng S, Duchan J. Social model philosophies and principles: their applications to therapies for aphasia.  Aphasiology. 2005;  19 906-922
• 9 Kagan A, Black S E, Duchan F J, Simmons-Mackie N, Square P. Training volunteers as conversation partners using “Supported Conversation for Adults with Aphasia” (SCA): a controlled trial.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2001;  44 (3) 624-638
• 10 Emunah R. The integrative five phase model of drama therapy. In: Johnson D R, Emunah R, eds. Current Approaches in Drama Therapy. 2nd ed. Springfield IL: Charles C Thomas; 2009: 37-64
• 11 Moreno J L. Psychodrama: Volumes I–III. Beacon, NY: Beacon House; 1946
• 12 Moreno Z T. Psychodramatic rules, techniques, and adjunctive methods.  Group Psychother. 1965;  18 73-86
• 13 Garcia A, Buchanan D R. Psychodrama. In: Johnson D R, Emunah R, eds. Current Approaches in Drama Therapy. 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 2009: 393-423
• 14 Boal A. The Rainbow of Desire: The Boal Method of Theatre and Therapy. New York, NY: Routledge; 1995
• 15 Sajnani N. Theatre of the Oppressed: Drama Therapy as Cultural Dialogue. In: Johnson D R, Emunah R, eds. Current Approaches in Drama Therapy. 2nd ed. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas; 2009: 461-482
• 16 Spolin V. Improvisation for the Theater. Evanston IL: Northwestern University; 1963
• 17 Doyle P J, McNeil M R, Hula W D. The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS): validating patient-reported communication difficulty and associated psychological distress in stroke survivors.  Aphasiology. 2003;  17 291-304
• 18 Babbitt E M, Cherney L R. Communication confidence in persons with aphasia.  Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;  17 (3) 214-223
• 19 Doyle P J, McNeil M R, Mikolic J M et al.. The Burden of Stroke Scale (BOSS) provides valid and reliable score estimates of functioning and well-being in stroke survivors with and without communication disorders.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;  57 (10) 997-1007
• 20 Babbitt E, Heinemann A, Semik P, Cherney L R. Psychometric Properties of the Communication Confidence Rating Scale for Aphasia (CCRSA): Phase 2. Aphasiology. 2011. 25: 727-735
• 21 Morris S B, DeShon R P. Combining effect size estimates in meta-analysis with repeated measures and independent-groups designs.  Psychol Methods. 2002;  7 (1) 105-125
• 22 Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988
• 23 Castka K, Abbanat G, Holland A, Szabo G. Potential benefits of participating in an aphasia theater program. Poster presented at: 39th Annual Clinical Aphasiology Conference; May 26–30, 2009; Keystone, CO
• 24 Wiklund I. Assessment of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials: the example of health-related quality of life.  Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2004;  18 (3) 351-363
• 25 Fries J F, Bruce B, Cella D. The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes.  Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;  23 (5 Suppl 39) S53-S57
• 26 Wilson P D. Lost and found.  Top Stroke Rehabil. 2010;  17 (6) 458-462