Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1289726
Novel Multicomponent Domino Approach to 2,5-Bifunctionalized Five-Membered Cyclic Nitrones
Publication History
Publication Date:
27 February 2012 (online)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e912c/e912cf2f8bb66fc7afa8a6410707d8185175b942" alt=""
Abstract
Multicomponent reactions of 2,2-dimethylpenta-3,4-dienal oxime with aldehydes and primary alcohols were studied and the optimum conditions for preparing a new family of 2,5-substituted five-membered cyclic nitrones were identified. This reaction offers direct access to the target structures in a single synthetic step. The scope and limitations of the reaction were evaluated, and all products were isolated and fully characterized.
Key words
allenes - alcohols - aldehydes - domino reactions - multicomponent reactions - nitrones
- Supporting Information for this article is available online:
- Supporting Information
-
1a
A domino reaction is defined as a process involving two or more bond-forming transformations that take place under constant reaction conditions without adding any additional reagent or catalyst and in which subsequent reactions occur as a consequence of functionality formed in a prior step.²a,b If the addition of any further reagents or catalysts is required, consecutive reactions is a more suitable term. See Hudlick’s discussion on this topic.¹b The term tandem reaction is often used in the literature as a synonym for domino reaction; however, the term domino reaction is preferred.²a Multicomponent reactions are a subclass of domino reactions in which three or more components combine to form a single product that essentially incorporates all the reactants within its structure.³a,b Furthermore, not all multicomponent reactions are domino processes; subsequent addition of reagents or changes in the reaction conditions are also acceptable in multicomponent reactions.³b
-
1b
Hudlický T. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96: 3 - For reviews on domino reactions, see:
-
2a
Tietze LF. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96: 115 -
2b
Tietze LF.Brasche G.Gericke KM. Domino Reactions in Organic Synthesis Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2006. -
2c
Tietze LF.Rackelmann N. Pure Appl. Chem. 2004, 76: 1967 -
2d
Padwa A.Bur SK. Tetrahedron 2007, 63: 5341 -
2e
Bunce RA. Tetrahedron 1995, 51: 13103 -
2f
Parsons PJ.Penkett CS.Shell AJ. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96: 195 -
2g
Tietze LF.Beifuss U. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1993, 32: 131 - For reviews on multicomponent reactions, see:
-
3a
Zhu J.Bienaymé H. Multicomponent Reactions Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2005. -
3b
Synthesis
of Heterocycles via Multicomponent Reactions
Orru RVA.Ruijter E. Springer; Berlin: 2005. -
3c
Sunderhaus JD.Martin SE. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15: 1300 -
3d
Gahem B. Acc. Chem. Res. 2009, 42: 463 -
3e
Saymala M. Org. Prep. Proced. Int. 2009, 41: 1 -
3f
Ramón DJ.Yus M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1993, 44: 1602 -
3g
Bienamé H.Hulme C.Oddon G.Schmitt P. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6: 3321 - 4 For the application of multicomponent
reactions in the area of diversity-oriented synthesis, see:
Biggs-Houck JE.Younai A.Shaw JT. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2010, 14: 371 - For recent examples, see:
-
5a
Liddle J.Allen MJ.Borthwick AD.Brooks DP.Davies DE.Edwards RM.Exall AM.Hamlett C.Irving WR.Mason AM.McCafferty GP.Nerozzi F.Peace S.Philp J.Pollard D.Pullen MA.Shabbir SS.Sollis SL.Westfall TD.Woollard PM.Wu C.Hickey DMB. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18: 90 -
5b
Nishizawa R.Nishiyama T.Hisaichi K.Matsunaga N.Minamoto C.Habashita H.Takaoka Y.Toda M.Shibayama S.Tada H.Sagawa K.Fukushima D.Maeda K.Mitsuya H. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17: 727 - 6 For an excellent review on the
synthesis of nitrones, see:
Feuer H. Nitrile Oxides, Nitrones, and Nitronates in Organic Synthesis Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2008. -
7a
Pellissier H. Tetrahedron 2007, 63: 3235 -
7b
Gothelf KV.Jørgensen KA. Chem. Rev. 1998, 98: 863 -
7c
Brandy A.Cardona F.Cicchi S.Cordero FM.Goti A. Chem. Eur. J. 2009, 15: 7808 -
7d
Bokach NA.Kukushkin VY. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2006, 55: 1869 -
7e
Romeo G.Iannazzo D.Piperno A.Romeo R.Corsaro A.Rescifina A.Chiacchio U. Mini-Rev. Org. Chem. 2005, 2: 59 -
7f
Pineiro M.Pinho e Melo TMVD. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 5287 -
7g
Frederickson M. Tetrahedron 1997, 53: 403 -
7h
Merino P.Tejero T. Molecules 1999, 4: 169 -
7i
Fišera L. In Heterocycles from Carbocyclic PrecursorsEl Ashry ESH. Springer; Berlin: 2007. p.287 -
8a
Synthetic Applications of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry
Toward Heterocycles and Natural Products
Padwa A.Pearson WH. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2002. -
8b
Nair V.Suja TD. Tetrahedron 2007, 63: 12247 -
9a
Bethell D. Adv. Phys. Org. Chem. 1998, 23: 91 -
9b
Gomez-Mejiba SE.Zhai Z.Akram H.Deterding LJ.Hensley K.Smith N.Towner RA.Tomer KB.Mason RP.Ramirez DC. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2009, 46: 853 -
9c
Fangour SE.Marini M.Good J.McQuaker SJ.Shields PG.Hartley RC. Age (Dordrecht, Neth.) 2009, 31: 269 -
9d
Berliner LJ. Appl. Magn. Reson. 2009, 36: 157 -
9e
Mason RP. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2004, 36: 1214 -
10a
Floyd RA.Kopke RD.Choi ChH.Foster SB.Doblas S.Towner RA. Free Radical Biol. Med. 2008, 45: 1361 -
10b
Hensley K.Carney JM.Steward CA.Tabatabaie T.Pye Q.Floyd RA. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 1997, 40: 299 -
10c
Floyd RA.Hensley K.Foster MJ.Kelleher-Andersson JA.Wood PL. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2002, 123: 1021 -
10d
Goldstein S.Lestage P. Curr. Med. Chem. 2000, 7: 1255 -
10e
Becker DA. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 1999, 56: 626 -
10f
Durand G.Polidori A.Ouari O.Tordo P.Geromel V.Rustin P.Pucci B. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46: 5230 -
10g
Sakiniene E.Collins LV. Arthritis Res. 2002, 4: 196 -
10h
Floyd RA.Kotake Y.Hensley K.Nakae D.Konishi Y. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2002, 234: 195 -
11a
Schleiss J.Rollin P.Tatibouet A. Angew. Chem. 2010, 122: 587 -
11b
Mancheno OG.Tangen P.Rohlmann R.Frohlich R.Aléman J. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17: 984 -
12a
Zachová H.Man S.Nečas M.Potáček M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2548 -
12b
For the synthesis of oxime 1 from the corresponding allenyl aldehyde, see ref. 13b.
-
13a
Buchlovič M.Man S.Kislitson K.Mathot Ch.Potáček M. Tetrahedron 2010, 66: 1821 -
13b
Buchlovič M.Man S.Potáček M. Tetrahedron 2008, 64: 9953 -
13c
Man S.Buchlovič M.Potáček M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47: 6961 -
13d
Buchlovič M.Man S.Potáček M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51: 5801 - 24
SHELXTL,
Version 5.10
Bruker AXS Inc.;
Madison:
1997.
References
For a more detailed discussion of the reaction pathway, see refs. 13a and 13b.
15The use of an alkali metal hydroxide (KOH) as the base caused an increase in the side product 6; see ref. 13a.
16The formation of nitrone 6 as the major product is in accordance with our previous observations of the reactivity of the allenyl oxime 1; see ref. 13a.
17The relative conversion was determined by using diphenyl ether as an internal standard. A value corresponding to 100% conversion was obtained by analysis of the reaction performed at 80 ˚C for 3 h.
18Zinc(II) bromide and copper(II) bromide were also tested as Lewis acid catalysts and 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) was tested as a Lewis base catalyst; the same results were obtained in each case.
19For more-detailed information about the purity of the reaction product, see the supplementary material for this article.
20Enolizable aldehydes were also found to be unsuitable as reaction components.
21We also attempted the synthesis of nitrones functionalized at position 4 of the nitrone skeleton by employing substituted derivatives of allenyl oxime 1; however, none of these reactions was successful.
22Carbon (gray), oxygen (red), and nitrogen (blue) atoms are drawn as principal ellipses (70% probability level). Hydrogen atoms are drawn as fixed-size spheres (cyan).
23Crystallographic data for compounds 4a and 4l have
been deposited with the accession numbers CCDC 822444 and 822443,
respectively, and can be obtained free of charge from the Cambridge
Crystallographic Data Centre, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ,
UK; Fax: +44(1223)336033;
E-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk;
Web site: www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html.