Int J Sports Med 2013; 34(08): 712-719
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291250
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Aerobic and Anaerobic Performances in Tethered Swimming

M. Papoti
1   School of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
2   Bioscience Institute, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil
,
A.S. R. da Silva
1   School of Physical Education and Sport of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil
,
G. G. Araujo
5   Sports Science Research Group, Federal University of Alagoas (UFAL), Brazil
,
V. Santiago
2   Bioscience Institute, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil
,
L.E. B. Martins
4   Laboratory of Instrumentation for Biomechanics, College of Physical Education, Campinas State University (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
,
S. A. Cunha
4   Laboratory of Instrumentation for Biomechanics, College of Physical Education, Campinas State University (UNICAMP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
,
C. A. Gobatto
3   Laboratory of Sports Applied Physiology, Campinas State University (UNICAMP), Limeira, São Paulo, Brazil
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf



accepted after revision 20. September 2011

Publikationsdatum:
04. Februar 2013 (online)

Preview

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the critical force (CritF) and anaerobic impulse capacity (AIC) – estimated by tethered swimming – reflect the aerobic and anaerobic performance of swimmers. 12 swimmers performed incremental test in tethered swimming to determine lactate anaerobic threshold (AnTLAC), maximal oxygen uptake (  ˙VO2MAX) and force associated with the  ˙VO2MAX (i ˙VO2MAX). The swimmers performed 4 exhaustive (tlim) exercise bouts (100, 110, 120 and 130% i ˙VO2MAX) to compute the CritF and AIC (F vs. 1/tlim model); a 30-s all-out tethered swimming bout to determine their anaerobic fitness (ANF); 100, 200, and 400-m time-trials to determine the swimming performance. CritF (57.09±11.77 N) did not differ from AnTLAC (53.96±11.52 N, (P>0.05) but was significantly lower than i ˙VO2MAX (71.02±8.36 N). In addition, CritF presented significant correlation with AnTLAC (r=0.76; P<0.05) and i ˙VO2MAX (r=0.74; P<0.05). On the other hand, AIC (286.19±54.91 N.s) and ANF (116.10±13.66 N) were significantly correlated (r=0.81, p<0.05). In addition, CritF and AIC presented significant correlations with all time-trials. In summary, this study demonstrates that CritF and AIC can be used to evaluate AnTLAC and ANF and to predict 100, 200, and 400-m free swimming.