A novel disposable, transnasal esophagoscope: a pilot trial of feasibility, safety, and tolerance

A novel disposable transnasal esophagoscope, the E.G. Scan (IntroMedic Co. Ltd., Seoul, Korea), was developed for the evaluation of esophageal diseases while eliminating the inconvenience associated with sterilization, portability, patient monitoring, complications, and the economic burden of sedation. The feasibility, safety, and tolerability of the first version of the E.G. Scan was evaluated in this pilot study. Nasal esophagoscopy was performed successfully in 46 patients with known or suspected esophageal diseases. At least 50 % of the Z-line was visualized by the E.G. Scan in 38 (82.6 %) of 46 patients. Abnormalities were identified in 27 patients: erosive esophagitis (n = 18), Barrett’s esophagus (n = 1), esophageal varices (n = 7), and esophageal candidiasis (n = 1). Nasal pain was absent or mild in most patients, and adverse events were not observed. Further technical improvement of the E.G. Scan would increase the diagnostic usefulness in future clinical practice.

• References

• 1 Dent J, El-Serag HB, Wallander MA et al. Epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut 2005; 54: 710-717
• 2 Wahlqvist P, Reilly MC, Barkun A. Systematic review: the impact of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease on work productivity. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006; 24: 259-272
• 3 Bennett JR, Atkinson M. The differentiation between oesophageal and cardiac pain. Lancet 1966; 2: 1123-1127
• 4 de Caestecker JS, Blackwell JN, Brown J et al. The oesophagus as a cause of recurrent chest pain: which patients should be investigated and which tests should be used?. Lancet 1985; 2: 1143-1146
• 5 Roberts KJ, Harper E, Alderson D et al. Long-term survival and cost analysis of an annual Barrett’s surveillance programme. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 22: 399-403
• 6 Garcia-Tsao G, Sanyal AJ, Grace ND et al. Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007; 46: 922-938
• 7 North Italian Endoscopic Club for the Study and Treatment of Esopageal varices. Prediction of the first variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis of the liver and esophageal varices. A prospective multicenter study. N Engl J Med 1988; 319: 983-989
• 8 Campo R, Montserrat A, Brullet E. Transnasal gastroscopy compared to conventional gastroscopy: a randomized study of feasibility, safety, and tolerance. Endoscopy 1998; 30: 448-452
• 9 Trevisani L, Cifala V, Sartori S et al. Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: a randomized trial. World J Gastroenterol 2007; 13: 906-911
• 10 Eisen GM, Eliakim R, Zaman A et al. The accuracy of PillCam ESO capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper endoscopy for the diagnosis of esophageal varices: a prospective three-center pilot study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 31-35
• 11 Galmiche JP, Sacher-Huvelin S, Coron E et al. Screening for esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus with wireless esophageal capsule endoscopy: a multicenter prospective trial in patients with reflux symptoms. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 538-545
• 12 Bhardwaj A, Hollenbeak CS, Pooran N et al. A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy for Barrett’s esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 1533-1539
• 13 Birkner B, Fritz N, Schatke W et al. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 647-651
• 14 Gralnek IM, Rabinovitz R, Afik D et al. A simplified ingestion procedure for esophageal capsule endoscopy: initial evaluation in healthy volunteers. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 913-918