Endoscopy 2012; 44(S 02): E49-E50
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291525
Unusual cases and technical notes
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic vacuum-assisted therapy of infected pancreatic pseudocyst using a coated sponge

I. Wallstabe
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany
,
A. Tiedemann
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany
,
I. Schiefke
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
06 March 2012 (online)

Endoscopic vacuum-assisted therapy (EVAT) is a reliable treatment for endoscopically accessible abscesses and was recently described in the management of infected pancreatic pseudocyst (IPC) [1] [2] [3] [4].

EVAT when performed in the region of the celiac trunk und portal venous system has, in theory, a higher risk of bleeding than when performed in other regions of the body. We treated a woman who had sepsis due to an IPC, chronic pancreatitis, and pronounced gastric varices by EVAT, but with a coated sponge.

The treatment was generally performed as previously described [4]. After 1 week of endoscopic therapy the cyst was free of necrosis and we started EVAT. We adjusted the size of the sponge according to the local topography and wrapped the Endo-SPONGE (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) in one layer of Suprasorb CNP Drainage Film (Lohmann & Rauscher, Vienna, Austria), a double-layered film for vacuum therapy of wounds ([Fig. 1] and [Fig. 2]) [5]. This set is not commercially available. Secretions were continuously evacuated with a suction of 120 mm Hg (16 kPa). We replaced the coated Endo-SPONGE system on the third day and finished EVAT on the seventh day.

Zoom Image
Fig. 1a Endo-SPONGE adjusted to a size of 35 mm in length and 14 mm in diameter. Beneath the Endo-SPONGE lies Suprasorb CNP Drainage Film. b Suprasorb Drainage Film wrapped around the Endo-SPONGE and fixed by sutures. A guide wire is inside the suction tube.
Zoom Image
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Endoscopic image of the coated Endo-SPONGE localized in the gastrocystic fistula.

The extraction of the wrapped Endo-SPONGE-system was, compared with the extraction of a pure sponge, easier, with less pulling force ([Fig. 3]). The transgastric access into the cyst was also smoother and less bloody ([Fig. 4]). On the seventh day of EVAT the pseudocyst was resolved. Finally we closed the gastrocystic fistula with metallic clips and one Endoloop (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) ([Fig. 5]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Image of the extracted Endo-SPONGE wrapped in one layer of Suprasorb CNP Drainage Film.
Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Endoscopic view of the gastrocystic fistula on the seventh day of EVAT with coated sponge.
Zoom Image
Fig. 5 Endoscopic view of the gastrocystic fistula closed by metallic clips and one Endoloop on the seventh day of EVAT.

No complications occurred during therapy and within 6 months after therapy. The treatment of IPC was completed during a single hospital stay.

In our opinion the coated sponge is an improvement in EVAT of infected pancreatic pseudocyst, because it simplifies the extraction of the Endo-SPONGE system and reduces the bleeding risk.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AS_2AD

 
  • References

  • 1 Wedemeyer J, Schneider A, Manns MP et al. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted closure of upper intestinal anastomotic leaks. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 708-711
  • 2 Wallstabe I, Plato R, Weimann A. Endoluminal vacuum therapy for anastomotic insufficiency after gastrectomy. Endoscopy 2010; 42: E165-E166
  • 3 Loske G, Schorsch T, Müller C. Intraluminal and intracavitary vacuum therapy for esophageal leakage: a new endoscopic minimally invasive approach. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 540-544
  • 4 Wallstabe I, Tiedemann A, Schiefke I. Endoscopic vacuum-assisted therapy of an infected pancreatic pseudocyst. Endoscopy 2011; 43: E312-E313
  • 5 Reich-Weinberger S, Schmitz M, Öfner D. New ways in the treatment of the “open abdomen” with a new device and the controlled negative pressure. Journal of Wound Technology 2011; 11: 32-34