Endoscopy 2012; 44(05): 549
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1291679
Letters to the editor
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Carbon dioxide insufflation vs. conventional saline irrigation for peroral video cholangioscopy

H. Li
,
E. Linghu
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
24 April 2012 (online)

We read with interest the article by Doi et al. [1]. The authors compared the time required to obtain a clear endoscopic image and the quality of the image between using CO2 insufflation and saline irrigation during peroral cholangioscopy (POCS). They found that the preparation time for CO2 insufflation was significantly shorter than that for saline irrigation while the image quality obtained by both methods was similar. This result is very helpful in clinical practice for endoscopists performing POCS.

First, CO2 insufflation is faster and therefore safer because a long procedure time can increase the CO2 volume, which might further increase complications, such as the depressed blood pressure observed by the authors. Although the depressed blood pressure was temporary, physicians should be aware of potential unexpected serious complications because CO2 use during POCS has not been widely reported [2] [3]. Albert et al. [3] considered CO2 insufflation to be advantageous in treating patients when argon plasma coagulation is applied because CO2 is an inert, non-combustible gas that is rapidly absorbed and is highly soluble in water/blood. However, we think that the speed of CO2 insufflation must be well controlled in order to prevent a dangerous increase in intraductal pressure, which may lead to CO2 air embolism. This complication was not reported during POCS but has been reported in association with CO2 insufflation in a case of right coronary artery ischemia during off-pump obtuse marginalis artery grafting [4].

Second, endoscopists may consider using CO2 insufflation as the first choice and only consider switching to saline irrigation in particular cases, such as hemorrhagic biliary tract cancer or protruding papillary lesions, during which better images can be obtained by saline irrigation.

 
  • References

  • 1 Doi S, Yasuda I, Makashima M et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation vs. conventional saline irrigation for peroral video cholangioscopy.. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 1070-1075
  • 2 Ueki T, Mizuno M, Ota S et al. Carbon dioxide insufflation is useful for obtaining clear images of the bile duct during peroral cholangioscopy (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 1046-1051
  • 3 Albert JG, Friedrich-Rust M, Elhendawy M et al. Peroral cholangioscopy for diagnosis and therapy of biliary tract disease using an ultra-slim gastroscope. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 1004-1009
  • 4 Shim JK, Choi YS, Yoo KJ et al. Carbon dioxide embolism induced right coronary artery ischaemia during off-pump obtuse marginalis artery grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2009; 36: 598-599