Download PDF
Laryngorhinootologie 2012; 91(S 01): S27-S47
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1297259
Referat
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Aktuelle Standards und Fortschritte in der onkologischen Bildgebung von Kopf-Hals-Tumoren

Current Oncologic Concepts and Emerging Techniques for Imaging of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
M. Sadick
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, (Direktor Professor Dr. med. Stefan O Schönberg), Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg
,
S. O. Schoenberg
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie und Nuklearmedizin, (Direktor Professor Dr. med. Stefan O Schönberg), Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg
,
K. Hoermann
2   Universitäts-HNO-Klinik Mannheim, (Direktor Professor Dr. med. Karl Hoermann), Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg
,
H. Sadick
2   Universitäts-HNO-Klinik Mannheim, (Direktor Professor Dr. med. Karl Hoermann), Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim der Universität Heidelberg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 March 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Plattenepithelkarzinome der Kopf-Hals Region (HNSCC) sind zunehmend und machen derzeit ca. 5% aller malignen Erkrankungen weltweit aus. Trotz zunehmender Entwicklungen in der bildgebenden Diagnostik und neuer Therapieoptionen, stellt das HNSCC eine multidisziplinäre Herausforderung dar. Einer der bedeutendsten Prognosefaktoren dieser Erkrankung ist die Präsenz von Lymphknotenmetastasen. Patienten mit gesichertem nodalen Befall haben eine deutlich eingeschränkte 5-Jahres Überlebensrate. Im Zeitalter der optimierten individualisierten chirurgischen und medikamentösen Tumortherapie, aber auch der intensitätsmodulierten Radiotherapie, bleibt die Hauptanforderung an die prä- und posttherapeutische Bildgebung eine frühzeitige Diagnosestellung und rechtzeitige Nachsorge. Fundiertes Tumorstaging und engmaschige Verlaufsbeobachtung nach Chirurgie und/oder Radio-Chemotherapie beeinflussen den Therapieverlauf und die Outcome-Prädiktion maßgeblich.

Der folgende Übersichtsbeitrag setzt sich mit aktuellen Standards und Fortschritten in der onkologischen Bildgebung des Plattenepithelkarzinoms der Kopf-Hals Region auseinander. Neben dem diagnostischen Indikationsspektrum der einzelnen bildgebenden Modalitäten werden auch ihre Grenzen aufgezeigt. Ein wesentlicher Bestandteil der Arbeit ist der PET-CT gewidmet, die funktionelle und morphologische Bildgebung vereint, sowie neue Entwicklungen in der MRT, insbesondere zum Lymphknotenstaging und zur Responseprädiktion. Nicht zuletzt findet sich ein klinischer Beitrag zu den Anforderungen des Kopf-Hals Chirurgen an die multimodale Bildgebung und den Einfluss der radiologisch-nuklearmedinischen Diagnostik auf das operative Behandlungskonzept.

Abstract

Currrent Oncologic Concepts and Emerging Techniques for Imaging of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer

The incidence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing and currently they account for 5% of all malignancies worldwide. Inspite of ongoing developments in diagnostic imaging and new therapeutic facilities, HNSCC still represents a multidisciplinary challenge.

One of the most important prognostic factors in HNSCC is the presence of lymph node metastases. Patients with confirmed nodal involvement have a considerable reduction of their 5-year overall survival rate. In the era of individually optimised surgery, chemotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy, the main role of pre- and posttherapeutic imaging remains cancer detection at an early stage and accurate follow-up. The combined effort of early diagnosis and close patient monitoring after surgery and/or radio-chemotherapy influences disease progression and outcome prediction in patients with HNSCC.

This review article focuses on currrent oncologic concepts and emerging tools in imaging of head and neck squamous cell cancer. Besides the diagnostic spectrum of the individual imaging modalities, their limitations are also discussed. One main part of this article is dedicated to PET-CT which combines functional and morphological imaging. Furthermore latest developments in MRT are presented with regard to lymph node staging and response prediction. Last but not least, a clinical contribution in this review explains, which information the head and neck surgeon requires from the multimodality imaging and its impact on operation planning.

Schlüsselwörter

HNSCC - Kopf-Hals Karzinom - PET-CT - Hypoxiebildgebung - Diffusionsbildgebung - MRT - Lymphknotenstaging

Key words

HNSCC - head and neck carcinoma - PET-CT - hypoxia imaging - diffusion weighted imaging - MRT - lymph node staging
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Lell M, Hinkmann F, Gottwald F, Bautz W, Radkow T. Oropharynxpathologie, Radiologe 2009; 49: 27-35
    PubMed
  • 2 Orlando GL, Wendt T, Buentzel J, Esser D, Lochner P, Mueller A, Schultze-Mosgau S, Altendorf-Hofmann A. Head and neck cancer in Germany: a site-specific analysis of survival of the Thuringian cancer registration database. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2010; 136: 55-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Castadot P, Lee JA, Geets X, Gregoire V. Adaptive Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2010; 20: 84-93
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Hall SF, Groome PA, Irish J, O’Sullivan B. Radiotherapy or Surgery for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer. Cancer 2009; 115: 5711-5722
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vogl TJ, Mack MG, Gstoettner W. Kopf-Hals-Karzinom – Bildgebende Diagnostik. Onkologe 2001; 7: 477-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Tao Y, Daly-Schveitzer N, Lusinchi A, Bourhis J. Advances in radiotherapy of head and neck cancers. Curr Opin Oncol 2010; 22: 194-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Werner JA. Lymphknotenerkrankungen im Kopf-Hals-Bereich. Springer-Verlag; Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: 2002: 3-42
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Fries R, Platz H, Wagner R, Stickler A, Grabner H, Kränzl B. Karzinome der Mundhöhle. Zur Frage der Abhängigkeit der Prognose von Alter und Geschlecht, Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 1979; 3: 193-200
    PubMed
  • 9 Ragin CCR, Modugno F, Gollin SM. The Epidemiology and Risk Factors of Head and Neck Cancer: a Focus on Human Papillomavirus. J Dent Res 2007; 86: 104-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Maier H, Fischer G, Sennewald E, Heller WD. Berufliche Risikofaktoren für Rachenkrebs. HNO 1994; 42: 530-540
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Shao JY, Li YH, Gao HY, Wu QL. Comparison of Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) DNA Levels and Serum EBV Immunoglobulin A/Virus Capsid Antigen Antibody Titers in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 100: 1162-1170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Ibrahim SO, Aarsaether N, Holsve MK, Kross K, Heimdal JH, Aarstad JH, Liavaag PG, Elgindi OA, Lillehaug JR, Vassstrand EN. Gene expression profile in oral squamous cell carcinomas and matching normal oral mucosal tissues from black Africans and white Caucasians: the case of the Sudan vs. Norway, Oral Oncol 2003; 39: 37-48
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Shah SI, Yip L, Greenberg B, Califano JA, Chow J, Eisenberger CF, Lee DJ, Sewell DA, Reed AL, Lango M, Jen J, Koch WM, Sidransky D. Two distinct regions of loss on chromosome arm 4q in primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126: 1073-1076
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Wittekind C, Weber A, Weidenbach H. Pathologie und Prognosefaktoren von Plattenepithelkarzinomen des Kopf-Hals-Bereiches. Onkologe 2001; 7: 498-504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Boehm A, Wichmann G, Mozet C, Dietz A. Aktuelle Therapieoptionen bei rezidivierenden Kopf-Hals-Tumoren. HNO 2010; 58: 762-769
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kawaguchi H, El-Naggar AK, Papadimitrakopoulou V, Ren H, Fan YH, Feng L, Lee JJ, Kim E, Hong WK, Lippmann SM, Mao L. Podoplanin: a Novel Marker for Oral Cancer Risk in Patients with Oral Premalignancy. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: 354-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Boonkitticharoen V, Kulapaditharom B, Leopairut J, Kraiphibul P, Larbcharoensub N, Cheewaruangroj W, Chintrakarn C, Pochanukul L. Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A and Proliferation Marker in Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Oral and Pharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134: 1305-1311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Murakami R, Uozumi H, Hirai T, Nishimura R, Shiraishi S, Ota K, Murakami D, Tomiguchi S, Oya N, Katsuragawa S, Yamashita Y. Impact of FDG-PET/CT Imaging on Nodal Staging for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 68: 377-382
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Yamazaki Y, Saitoh M, Notani K, Tei K, Totsuka Y, Takinami S, Kanegae K, Inubushi M, Tamaki N, Kitagawa Y. Assessment of cervical lymph node metastases using FDG-PET in patients with head and neck cancer. Ann Nucl Med 2008; 22: 177-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Yamashina A, Tanimoto K, Sutthiprapaporn P, Hayakawa Y. The reliability of computed tomography (CT) values and dimensional measurements of the oropharyngeal region using cone beam CT: comparison with multidetector CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 245-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 King AD. Multimodality Imaging of head and neck cancer. Cancer Imaging 2007; 7: 37-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Sham ME, Nishat S. Imaging modalities in head and neck cancer patients-overview. J Cancer Res Exp Oncol 2011; 3: 22-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Aschenbach R, Eßer D. Aktuelle Aspekte der posttherapeutischen Bildgebung bei Kopf-Hals-Malignomen. HNO 2010; 58: 749-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Gu DH, Yoon Y, Park CH, Chang SK, Lim KJ, Seo YL, Yun EJ, Choi CS, Bae SH. CT, MR, 18F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity. Acta Radiol 2010; 51: 1111-1119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Yousem DM, Gad K, Tufano RP. Resectability Issues with Head and Neck Cancer. AJNR 2006; 27: 2024-2036
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Becker M, Burkhardt K, Allal AS, Dulguerov P, Ratib O, Becker CD. Prä- und posttherapeutische Larynxbildgebung. Radiologe 2009; 49: 43-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Li B, Bobinski M, Gandour-Edwards R, Farwell DG, Chen AM. Overstaging of cartilage invasion by multidetector CT scan for laryngeal cancer and ist potential effect on the use of organ preservation with chemoradiation. BJR 2011; 84: 64-69
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Becker M, Zbären P, Delavelle J, Kurt AM, Egger C, Rüfenacht DA, Terrier F. Neoplastic invasion of the laryngeal cartilage: reassessment of criteria for diagnosis at CT. Radiology 1997; 203: 521-532
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Faggioni L, Neri E, Cerri F, Picano E, Seccia V, Muscatello L, Franceschini SS, Bartolozzi C. 64-row MDCT perfusion of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: technical feasibility and quantitative analysis of perfusion parameters. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 113-121
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kau RJ, Alexiou C, Laubenbacher C, Werner M, Schwaiger M, Arnold W. Lymph node detection of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas by positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose F 18 in a routine clinical setting. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1999; 125: 1322-1328
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Di Martino E, Nowak B, Hassan HA, Hausmann R, Adam G, Buell U, Westhofen M. Diagnosis and staging of head and neck cancer: a comparison of modern imaging modalities (positron emission tomography, computed tomography, color-coded duplex sonography) with panendoscopic and histopathologic findings. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000; 126: 1457-1461
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Schroeder U, Dietlein M, Wittekindt C, Ortmann M, Stuetzer H, Vent J, Jungehuelsing M, Krug B. Is there a need for positron emission tomography imaging to stage the NO neck in 11-T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity or oropharynx?. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2008; 117: 854-863
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Van der Poorten V, Dirix P, Verbeken E, Nuyts S, Hermans R. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging. Radiology 2009; 251: 134-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Yoon DV, Hwang HS, Chang SK, Rho YS, Ahn HY, Kim JH, Lee IJ. CT, MR, US, 18 F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 634-642
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Schmid-Bindert G, Henzler T, Chu TQ, Meyer M, Nance W, Schoepf UJ, Dinter DJ, Apfalterer P, Krissak R, Manegold C, Schoenberg SO, Fink C. Functional imaging of lung cancer using dual energy CT: how does iodine related attenuation correlate with standardized uptake value of 18FDG-PET-CT?. Eur Radiol 2011; DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2230-3.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Lell M, Baum U, Koester M, Nömayr A, Greess H, Lenz M, Bautz W. Morphologische und funktionelle Diagnostik der Kopf-Hals-Region mit Mehrzeilen-Spiral-CT. Radiologe 1999; 39: 932-938
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Subramaniam RM, Truong M, Peller P, Sakai O, Mercier G. Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron-Emission Tomography imaging of head and neck squamous cell cancer. Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 598-604
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Haerle SK, Strobel K, Ahmad N, Soltermann A, Schmid DT, Stoeckli S. Contrast-enhanced 18 F-FDG-PET/CT for the assessment of necrotic lymph node metastases. Head Neck 2011; 33: 324-329
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Higgins KA, Hoang JK, Roach MC, Chino J, Yoo DS, Turkington TG, Brizel DM. Analysis of pretreatment FDG-PET SUV parameters in head-and-neck cancer: tumor SUVmean has superior prognostic value. Int J Radiation Oncology Biol Phys 2011; 27: 1-6
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Liao CT, Wang HM, Huang SF, Chen IH, Kang CJ, Lin CY, Fan KH, Shu-Hang N, Hsueh C, Lee LY, Yen TC. PET and PET/CT of the neck lymph nodes improves risk prediction in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. J Nucl Med 2011; 52: 180-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Biograph mCT. http://www.siemens.de/MI
    PubMed
  • 42 Kadrmas DJ, Casey ME, Conti M, Jakoby BW, Lois C, Townsend DW. Impact of Time-of-Flight on PET tumor detection. J Nucl Med 2009; 50: 1315-1323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Lois C, Jakoby BW, Long MJ, Hubner KF, Barker DW, Casey ME, Conti M, Panin VY, Kadrmas DJ, Townsend DW. An assessment of the impact of incorporating time-of-flight information into clinical PET/CT imaging. J Nucl Med 2010; 51: 237-245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Reske S, Kotzerke K. FDG-PET for clinical use (results of the 3rd German Interdisciplinary Consensus Conference, „Onko-PET III“). Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 28: 1707-1723
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde , Kopf-und Hals-Chirurgie e. V., Bonn. http://www.hno.org
    PubMed
  • 46 Rödel R, Straehler-Pohl HJ, Palmedo H, Reichmann K, Jaeger U, Reinhardt MJ, Biersack HJ. PET-CT-Bildgebung bei Kopf-Hals-Tumoren. Radiologe 2004; 44: 1055-1059
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Fletcher JW, Djulbegovic B, Soares HP, Siegel BA, Lowe V, Lyman GH, Coleman RE, Wahl R, Paschold JC, Avril N, Einhorn LH, Suh WW, Samson D, Delbeke D, Gorman M, Shields AF. Recommendations on the use of 18F-FDG PET in oncology. J Nucl Med 2008; 49: 480-508
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Hustinx R, Lucignani G. PET/CT in head and neck cancer: an update. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2010; 37: 645-651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Shu-Hang N, Chan SC, Liao CT, Chang JT, Ko SF, Wang HM, Chin SC, Lin CY, Huang SF, Yen TC. Distant metastases and synchronous second primary tumors in patients with newly diagnosed oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal carcinomas: evaluation of 18F-FDG PET and extended field multi-detector row CT. Neuroradiology 2008; 50: 969-979
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Snow G, Annyas AA, Slooten van EA, Bartelink H, Hart AA. Prognostic factors of neck node metastases. Clin Otolaryngol 1982; 7: 185-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Richard C, Prevot N, Timoshenko A, Dumollard JM, Dubois F, Martin C, Prades JM. Preoperative combined 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging in head and neck cancer: does it really improve initial N staging?. Acta Oto-Laryngol 2010; 130: 1421-1424
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Lonneux M, Hamoir M, Reychler H, Maingon P, Duvillard C, Calais G, Bridji B, Digue L, Toubeau M, Gregoire V. Positron Emission Tomography with 18 F-FDG improves staging and patient management in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multicenter prospective study. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28: 1190-1195
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Sadick M, Kayed H, Pinol R, Frey S, Fink C, Schoenberg S, Brade J, Sadick H, Hoermann K, He V. ECR-European Congress of Radiology 03/2011, Vienna; Session 408 “Challenges in Head and Neck Cancer”: Optimisation of reconstruction algorithms in Truepoint HD PET/CT for improved diagnostic accuracy of lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Mozet C, Wuttke P, Bertolini J, Horn LC, Dietz A. Zervikale und axillare Metastasen unbekannten Ursprungs als CUP-Syndrom. Onkologe 2008; 14: 898-907
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Bohuslavizki KH, Klutmann S, Kroger S. FDG PET detection of unknown primary tumors. J Nucl Med 2000; 41: 816-822
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Broams JW, Prium J, Kole AC, Nikkels PG, Vaalburg W, Vermey A, Roodenburg JL. Detection of unknown primary head and neck tumors by positron emission tomography. Int J Maxillofac Surg 1997; 26: 112-115
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Jenicke L, Bohuslavizki KH, Sonnemann U, Thoms J, Buchert R, Werner JA, Clausen M. FDG-PET in der Bildgebung des CUP-Syndroms. Onkologe 2001; 7: 491-497
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Yaghmai V, Miller FH, Rezai P, Benson AB, Salem R. Response to treatment series: part 2, tumor response assessment-using new and conventional criteria. Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 18-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Levine ZH, Galloway BR, Peskin AP, Heussel CP, Chen JJ. Tumor volume measurement errors of RECIST studied with ellipsoids. Med Phys 2011; 38: 2552-2557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Herrmann K, Krause BJ, Bundschuh RA, Dechow T, Schwaiger M. Monitoring response to therapeutic interventions in patients with cancer. Semin Nucl Med 2009; 39: 210-232
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Chung MK, Jeong HS, Park SG, Jang JY, Son YI, Choi JY, Hyun SH, Park K, Ahn MJ, Ahn YC, Kim HJ, Ko YH, Baek CH. Metabolic tumor volume of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography predicts short-term outcome to radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy in pharyngeal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15: 5861-5868
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Chung MK, Jeong HS, Son YI, So YK, Park GY, Choi JY, Hyun SH, Kim HJ, Ko YH, Baek CH. Metabolic tumor volumes by [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT correlate with occult metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Ann Surg Oncol 2009; 16: 3111-3117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Bussink J, van Herpen CM, Kaanders JH, Oyen WJG. PET-CT for response assessment and treatment adaptation in head and neck cancer. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 661-669
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Andrade RS, Heron DE, Degirmenci B, Filho PA, Branstetter BF, Seethala RR, Ferris RL, Avril N. Posttreatment assessment of response using FDG-PET/CT for patients treated with definitive radiation therapy for head and neck cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 65: 1315-1322
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Horiuchi C, Taguchi T, Yoshida T, Nishimura G, Kawakami M, Tanigaki Y, Matsuda H, Mikami Y, Oka T, Inoue T, Tsukuda M. Early assessment of clinical response to concurrent chemoradiotherapy in head and neck carcinoma using fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography. Auris Nasus Larynx 2008; 35: 103-108
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Brun E, Kjellén E, Tennvall J, Ohlsson T, Sandell A, Perfekt R, Perfekt R, Wennerberg J, Strand SE. FDG PET studies during treatment: prediction of therapy outcome in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2002; 24: 127-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Connell CA, Corry J, Milner AD, Hogg A, Hicks RJ, Rischin D, Peters LJ. Clinical impact of, and prognostic stratification by, F-18 FDG PET/CT in head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2007; 29: 986-995
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Malone JP, Gerberi MA, Vasireddy S, Hughes LF, Rao K, Shevlin B, Kuhn M, Collette D, Tennenhouse J, Robbins KT. Early prediction of response to chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer: reliability of restaging with combined positron emission tomography and computed tomography. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 135: 1119-1125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Passero VA, Branstetter BF, Shuai Y, Heron DE, Gibson MK, Lai SY, Kim SW, Grandis JR, Ferris RL, Johnson JT, Argiris A. Response assessment by combined PET-CT scan versus CT scan alone using RECIST in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Ann Oncol 2010; 21: 2278-2283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur RK, Raben D, Baselga J, Spencer SA, Zhu J, Youssoufian H, Rowinsky EK, Ang KK. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol 2010; 11: 21-28
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur R, Raben D, Jassem J, Ove R, Kies MS, Baselga J, Youssoufian H, Amellal N, Rowinsky EK, Ang KK. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 567-578
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Liu N, Li M, Li X, Meng X, Yang G, Zhao S, Yang Y, Ma L, Fu Z, Yu J. PET-based biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of epidermal growth factor receptor-selective tracer 11C-PD153035 in humans. J Nucl Med 2009; 50: 303-308
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Heuveling DA, Bree R, Dongen van G. The potential role of non-FDG-PET in the management of head and neck cancer. Oral Oncology 2011; 47: 2-7
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Troost EG, Schinagl DA, Bussink J, Oyen WJ, Kaanders J. Clinical evidence on PET-CT for radiation planning in head and neck tumors. Radiotherapy and Oncology 2010; 96: 328-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Dirix P, Vandecaveye V, Keyzer F, Stroobants S, Hermans R, Nuyts S. Dose painting in radiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of repeated functional imaging with 18F-FDG PET, 18F-Fluoromisonidazole PET, diffusion-weighted MRI, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. J Nucl Med 2009; 50: 1020-1027
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Troost EG, Schinagl DA, Bussink J, Boerman OC, Kogel AJ, Oyen WJ, Kaanders J. Innovations in radiotherapy planning of head and neck cancers: role of PET. J Nucl Med 2010; 51: 66-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Postema EJ, Mc Ewan AJ, Riauka TA, Kumar P, Richmond DA, Abrams DN, Wiebe LI. Initial result of hypoxia imaging using 18F-FAZA. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2009; 36: 1565-1573
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 78 Souvatzoglu M, Grosu AL, Röper B, Krause BJ, Beck R, Reischl G, Picchio M, Machulla HJ, Wester HJ, Piert M. Tumor hypoxia imaging with 18F-FAZA PET in head and neck cancer patients: a pilot study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2007; 34: 1566-1575
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 79 Molls M, Feldmann HJ, Fuller J. Oxygenation of locally advanced recurrent rectal cancer, soft tissue sarcoma and breast cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol 1994; 345: 459-463
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 80 Bentzen L, Keiding S, Nordsmark M, Falborg L, Hansen SB, Keller J, Nielsen OS, Overgaard J. Tumour oxygenation assessed by 18 F-fluoromisonidazole PET and polarographic needle electrodes in human soft tissue tumours. Radiother Oncol 2003; 67: 339-344
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 81 Wang W, Lee NY, Georgi JC, Narayanan M, Guillem J, Schöder H, Humm JL. Pharmacokinetic analysis of hypoxia 18 F-Fluoromisonidazole dynamic PET in head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med 2010; 51: 37-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 82 Wang W, Lee NY, Georgi JC, Narayanan M, Guillem J, Schöder H, Humm JL. Pharmacokinetic analysis of hypoxia (18)F-fluoromisonidazole dynamic PET in head and neck cancer. J Nucl Med 2010; 51: 37-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 83 Lee NY, Mechalakos JG, Nehmeh S, Lin Z, Squire OD, Cai S, Chan K, Zanzonico PB, Greco C, Ling CC, Humm JL, Schöder H. Fluorine-18-labeled fluoromisonidazole positron emission and computed tomography-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: a feasibility study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70: 2-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 84 Jansen J, Schöder H, Lee NY, Wang Y, Pfister DG, Fury MG, Stambuk HE, Humm JL, Koutcher J, Shukla-Dave A. Noninvasive assessment of tumor microenvironment using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and18F-fluoromisonidazole positron emission tomography imaging in neck nodal metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 77: 1403-1410
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 85 Lee FK, King AD, Ma BB, Yeung DK. Dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for differential diagnosis in head and neck cancers. Eur J Radiol 2011; PMID: 21376492 (ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 86 Chikui T, Kawano S, Kawazu T, Hatakenaka M, Koga S, Ohga M, Matsuo Y, Sunami S, Sugiura T, Shioyama Y, Obara M, Yoshiura K. Prediction and monitoring of the response to chemoradiotherapy in oral squamous cell carcinomas using a pharmacokinetic analysis based on the dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging findings. Eur Radiol 2011; 21: 1699-1708
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 87 Casselman JW. High-resolution imaging of the skull base and larynx. In: Schoenberg SO, Dietrich O, Reiser MF. eds. Parallel imaging in clinical MR applications. Springer; 2007: 199-208
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 88 Verduijn GM, Bartels LW, Raaijmakers CP, Terhaard CH, Pameijer FA, van den Berg CA. Magnetic resonance imaging protocol optimization for delineation of gross tumor volume in hypopharyngeal and laryngeal tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2009; 74 (02) 630-636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 89 Park JO, Jung SL, Joo YH, Jung CK, Cho KJ, Kim MS. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of tumor invasion depth in oral/oropharyngeal cancer. Oral Oncol 2011; 47 (05) 381-386
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 90 Yousem DM, Gad K, Tufano RP. Resectability issues with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27 (10) 2024-2036
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 91 Hsu WC, Loevner LA, Karpati R et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting absence of fixation of head and neck cancer to the prevertebral space. Head Neck 2005; 27 (02) 95-100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 92 Gu DH, Yoon DY, Park CH et al. CT, MR, (18)F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of mandibular invasion by squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity. Acta Radiol 2010; 51 (10) 1111-1119
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 93 Nakamoto Y, Tamai K, Saga T et al. Clinical value of image fusion from MR and PET in patients with head and neck cancer. Mol Imaging Biol 2009; 11 (01) 46-53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 94 Boss A, Stegger L, Bisdas S et al. Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR imaging in the head and upper neck area. Eur Radiol 2011; 21 (07) 1439-1446
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 95 de Bondt RB, Nelemans PJ, Hofman PA et al. Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 2007; 64 (02) 266-272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 96 de Bondt RB, Nelemans PJ, Bakers F et al. Morphological MRI criteria improve the detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: multivariate logistic regression analysis of MRI features of cervical lymph nodes. Eur Radiol 2009; 19 (03) 626-633
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 97 Bisdas S, Baghi M, Huebner F et al. In vivo proton MR spectroscopy of primary tumours, nodal and recurrent disease of the extracranial head and neck. Eur Radiol 2007; 17 (01) 251-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 98 Chawla S, Kim S, Loevner LA et al. Proton and phosphorous MR spectroscopy in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Acad Radiol 2009; 16 (11) 1366-1372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 99 Abdel Razek AA, Gaballa G. Role of perfusion magnetic resonance imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2011; 35 (01) 21-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 100 Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 2003; 348 (25) 2491-2499
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 101 Sigal R, Vogl T, Casselman J et al. Lymph node metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: MR imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (Sinerem MR) – results of a phase-III multicenter clinical trial. Eur Radiol 2002; 12 (05) 1104-1113
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 102 Baghi M, Mack MG, Wagenblast J et al. Iron oxide particle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for detection of benign lymph nodes in the head and neck: how reliable are the results?. Anticancer Res 2007; 27 (5B) 3571-3575
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 103 Mack MG, Balzer JO, Straub R, Eichler K, Vogl TJ. Superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging of head and neck lymph nodes. Radiology 2002; 222 (01) 239-244
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 104 Lambregts DM, Beets GL, Maas M et al. Accuracy of gadofosveset-enhanced MRI for nodal staging and restaging in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2011; 253 (03) 539-545
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 105 Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Dirix P, Lambrecht M, Nuyts S, Hermans R. Applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Neuroradiology 2010; 52 (09) 773-784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 106 Re TJ, Lemke A, Klauss M et al. Enhancing pancreatic adenocarcinoma delineation in diffusion derived intravoxel incoherent motion f-maps through automatic vessel and duct segmentation. Magn Reson Med 2011;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 107 Holzapfel K, Duetsch S, Fauser C, Eiber M, Rummeny EJ, Gaa J. Value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the differentiation between benign and malignant cervical lymph nodes. Eur J Radiol 2009; 72 (03) 381-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 108 Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Vander Poorten V et al. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging. Radiology 2009; 251 (01) 134-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 109 de Bondt RB, Hoeberigs MC, Nelemans PJ et al. Diagnostic accuracy and additional value of diffusion-weighted imaging for discrimination of malignant cervical lymph nodes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Neuroradiology 2009; 51 (03) 183-192
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 110 Abdel Razek AA, Soliman NY, Elkhamary S, Alsharaway MK, Tawfik A. Role of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in cervical lymphadenopathy. Eur Radiol 2006; 16 (07) 1468-1477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 111 Perrone A, Guerrisi P, Izzo L et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical lymph nodes: differentiation between benign and malignant lesions. Eur J Radiol 2011; 77 (02) 281-286
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 112 Dirix P, Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI for nodal staging of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: impact on radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2010; 76 (03) 761-766
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 113 Sumi M, Sakihama N, Sumi T et al. Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003; 24 (08) 1627-1634
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 114 Sumi M, Van Cauteren M, Nakamura T. MR microimaging of benign and malignant nodes in the neck. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186 (03) 749-757
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 115 Knegjens JL, Hauptmann M, Pameijer FA et al. Tumor volume as prognostic factor in chemoradiation for advanced head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2011; 33 (03) 375-382
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 116 Bhatia KS, King AD, Yu KH et al. Does primary tumour volumetry performed early in the course of definitive concomitant chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma improve prediction of primary site outcome?. Br J Radiol 2010; 83 (995) 964-970
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 117 Vandecaveye V, Dirix P, De Keyzer F et al. Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Early After Chemoradiotherapy to Monitor Treatment Response in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 118 Berrak S, Chawla S, Kim S et al. Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Predicting Progression Free Survival in Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck Treated with Induction Chemotherapy. Acad Radiol 2011;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 119 Kim S, Loevner L, Quon H et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting and detecting early response to chemoradiation therapy of squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Clin Cancer Res 2009; 15 (03) 986-994
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 120 Vandecaveye V, Dirix P, De Keyzer F et al. Predictive value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging during chemoradiotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2010; 20 (07) 1703-1714
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 121 King AD, Mo FK, Yu KH et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for prediction and monitoring of treatment response. Eur Radiol 2010; 20 (09) 2213-2220
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 122 Jansen JF, Schoder H, Lee NY et al. Tumor Metabolism and Perfusion in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Pretreatment Multimodality Imaging with (1)H Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI, and [(18)F]FDG-PET. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2011;
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 123 Chawla S, Kim S, Loevner LA et al. Prediction of disease-free survival in patients with squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011; 32 (04) 778-784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 124 Kim S, Loevner LA, Quon H et al. Prediction of response to chemoradiation therapy in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31 (02) 262-268
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 125 Herborn CU, Unkel C, Vogt FM, Massing S, Lauenstein TC, Neumann A. Whole-body MRI for staging patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Otolaryngol 2005; 125 (11) 1224-1229
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 126 Antoch G, Vogt FM, Freudenberg LS et al. Whole-body dual-modality PET/CT and whole-body MRI for tumor staging in oncology. JAMA 2003; 290 (24) 3199-3206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 127 Schmidt GP, Baur-Melnyk A, Herzog P et al. High-resolution whole-body magnetic resonance image tumor staging with the use of parallel imaging versus dual-modality positron emission tomography-computed tomography: experience on a 32-channel system. Invest Radiol 2005; 40 (12) 743-753
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 128 Schmidt GP, Schoenberg SO, Schmid R et al. Screening for bone metastases: whole-body MRI using a 32-channel system versus dual-modality PET-CT. Eur Radiol 2007; 17 (04) 939-949
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 129 Ng SH, Chan SC, Yen TC et al. Comprehensive imaging of residual/recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma using whole-body MRI at 3T compared with FDG-PET-CT. Eur Radiol 2010; 20 (09) 2229-2240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 130 Liu T, Cheng T, Xu W, Yan WL, Liu J, Yang HL. A meta-analysis of 18FDG-PET, MRI and bone scintigraphy for diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with breast cancer. Skeletal Radiol 2011; 40 (05) 523-531
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 131 Ohno Y, Koyama H, Onishi Y et al. Non-small cell lung cancer: whole-body MR examination for M-stage assessment – utility for whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging compared with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology 2008; 248 (02) 643-654
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 132 Weckbach S, Michaely HJ, Stemmer A, Schoenberg SO, Dinter DJ. Comparison of a new whole-body continuous-table-movement protocol versus a standard whole-body MR protocol for the assessment of multiple myeloma. Eur Radiol 2010; 20 (12) 2907-2916
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 133 Fischer M, Strauß G, Gahr S, Richter I, Müller S, Burgert O, Dornheim J, Preim B, Dietz A, Boehm A. Dreidimensionale Bildprozessierung in der HNO-Onkologie zur präoperativen Planung und Evaluierung. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 2009; 88: 229-233
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 134 Aschenbach R, Eßer D. Aktuelle Aspekte der posttherapeutischen Bildgebung bei Kopf-Hals-Malignomen. HNO Aug 2010; 58: 749-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 135 Kösling S, Bootz F. Bildgebung HNO-Heilkunde. Springer-Verlag; 2010
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 136 Aschenbach R, Eßer D. Bildgebung in der HNO. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 2011; 90: 103-118
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 137 Vogl TJ, Mack MG, Gstöttner W. Kopf-Hals-Karzinom. Bildgebende Diagnostik. Onkologe 2001; 7: 477-490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 138 Stuck BA, Bachert C, Federspil P, Hörmann K, Hosemann W, Klimek L, Mösges R, Pfaar O, Rudack C, Wagenmann M, Weber R. AWMF Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie. Rhinosinusitis. Langfassung AWMF-Leitlinienregister Nr. 017/049; aktueller Stand: 03/2011
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 139 Zinreich SJ, Kennedy DW, Rosenbaum AE, Gayler BW, Kumar AJ, Stammberger H. Paranasal sinuses; CT imaging requirements for endoscopic surgery. Radiology. 1987. 163. 769-775
    Google Scholar
  • 140 Dammann F. Bildgebung der Nasennebenhohlen (NNH) in der heutigen Zeit. Radiologe 2007; 47 (576) 578-583
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 141 AWMF Leitlinien der Deutschen Röntgengesellschaft Gesichtsschädel. Entzündungen. AWMF Leitlinienregister Nr. 039/037
    PubMed
  • 142 Lang S, Jager L, Grevers G. Zur Aussagefähigkeit koronarer Sekundärrekonstruktionen computertomographischer Sequenzen der Nasenneben-höhlen. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 2002; 81: 418-421
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 143 Dammann F, Bode A, Heuschmid M, Kopp A, Georg C, Pereira PL, Claussen CD. Mehrschicht-Spiral-CT der Nasennebenhöhlen: Erste Erfahrungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Strahlenexposition. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2000; 172: 701-706
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 144 Strauss G, Meixensberger J, Dietz A, Manzey D. Automation in der HNO-Chirurgie. Laryngo-Rhino-Otol 2007; 86: 256-262
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 145 Becker M, Burkhardt K, Allal AS, Dulguerov P, Ratib O, Becker CD. Prä- und posttherapeutische Larynxbildgebung. Radiologe 2009; 49: 43-58
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 146 Moharir VM, Fried MP, Vernick DM, Janecka IP, Zahajsky J, HSU L, Lorensen WE, Anderson M, Wells WM, Morrison P, Kikinis R. Computer-assisted three-dimensional reconstruction of head and neck tumors. Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 1592-1598
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 147 Luca Salvolini L, Bichi Secchi E, Costarelli L, De Nicola M. Clinical applications of 2D and 3D CT imaging of the airways – a review. Eur J Radiol 2000; 34: 9-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 148 Cattin P, Schulz G, Reyes M. Bildgebende Verfahren. Neue Methoden verändern die Chirurgie. MKG-Chirurg 2011; 4: 16-22
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 149 Rudman DT, Stredney D, Sessanna D, Yagel R, Crawfis R, Heskamp D, Edmond CV, Wiet GJ. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery training simulator. Laryngoscope 1998; 108: 1643-1647
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 150 Stasche N, Quirrenbach T, Bärmann M, Krebs M, Harrass M, Friedrich K. IMOLA – ein interventionsfähiges Larynxmodell. HNO 2005; 53: 869-875
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar