Arzneimittelforschung 2012; 62(03): 113-116
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1297964
Original Article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Bioequivalence Evaluation of 2 Tablet Formulations of Entecavir in Healthy Chinese Volunteers: A Single-Dose, Randomized-Sequence, Open-Label Crossover Study

J. Jin*
1   School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
J. Liu*
1   School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
J. Chen
1   School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
L. Zhao
1   School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
Z. Ma
2   Department of Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
X. Chen
2   Department of Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
M. Huang
1   School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
,
G. Zhong
1   School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received 08 November 2011

accepted 22 November 2011

Publication Date:
20 January 2012 (online)

Abstract

A randomized, 2-way crossover study was conducted in healthy Chinese male volunteers to evaluate the bioequivalence of a new generic formulation of entecavir (CAS 142217-69-4) tablets (test) and the available branded formulation (reference) to meet the requirements for marketing the test product in China. Test and reference tablets were administered as a single dose on 2 treatment days separated by a 2-week washout period. Blood samples were collected for a period of 24 h following drug administration. Plasma concentration of entecavir was determined by a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a noncompartmental model. Bioequivalence was determined by calculating 90% CIs for the ratios of Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ values for the test and reference products. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring vital signs, laboratory tests and interviews with the volunteers before administration and every 2 h during the study. The 90% CIs of entecavir for Cmax, AUC0–t and AUC0–∞ were 95.2–106.9%, 98.4–104.6% and 97.3–104.4%, respectively, which fell within the interval of 80–125%. No clinically important adverse effects were reported. These results suggested that the test formulation of entecavir tablets met the regulatory criterion for bioequivalence to the reference formulation.

*

*  Co-first authors