Download PDF
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2012; 72(4): 291-292
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1298395
Letter to the Editor
GebFra Science
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

The Danger of Time-Consuming Operative Laparoscopies: Avoiding Severe Complications

Langandauernde operative Laparoskopien: Gefährdung durch schwerwiegende Komplikationen
R. L. De Wilde
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Pius Clinic, 26121 Oldenburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 May 2012 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Key words

operative laparoscopy - complications - time factor - thrombosis - nerve lesions - compartment syndrome

Schlüsselwörter

operative Laparoskopie - Komplikationen - Zeitfaktor - Thrombose - Nervenschädigung - Kompartimentsyndrom
 

  • References

  • 1 Twijnstra ARH, Kolkman W, Trimbos-Kemper GCM et al. Implementation of advanced laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: national overview of trends. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2010; 17: 487-492
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Diwadkar GB, Chen CCG, Paraiso MFR. An update on the laparoscopic approach to urogynecology and pelvic reconstructive procedures. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2008; 20: 496-500
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Mettler L, Meinhold-Heerlein I. The value of laparoscopic surgery to stage gynaecological cancers: present and future. Minerva Ginecol 2009; 61: 319-337
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Mayooran Z, Rombauts L, Brown TIH et al. Reliability and validity of an objective assessment instrument of laparoscopic skill. Fertil Steril 2004; 82: 976-978
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Ascher-Walsh CJ, Capes T. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14: 719-723
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Lam A, Kaufman Y, Khong SY et al. Dealing with complications in laparoscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 23: 631-646
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Nick AM, Schmeler KM, Frumovitz MM et al. Risk of thromboembolic disease in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecologic surgery. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 956-961
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Hong JY, Kim WO, Kil HK. Detection of subclinical CO2 embolism by transesophageal echocardiography during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology 2010; 75: 581-584
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Rao MM, Jayne D. Lower limb compartment syndrome following laparoscopic colorectal surgery: a review. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 494-499
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Volz J, Köster S, Spacek Z et al. The influence of pneumoperitoneum used in laparoscopic surgery on an intraabdominal tumor growth. Cancer 1999; 86: 770-774
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Agostini A, Carcopino X, Franchi F et al. Port site metastasis after laparoscopy for uterine cervical carcinoma. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 1663-1665
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 De Wilde RL, Trew G. Postoperative abdominal adhesions and their prevention in gynaecological surgery. Expert consensus position. Gynecol Surg 2007; 4: 161-168
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Lower AM, Hawthorn RJ, Clark D et al. Adhesion-related readmissions following gynaecological laparoscopy or laparotomy in Scotland: an epidemiological study of 24 046 patients. Hum Reprod 2004; 19: 1877-1885
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar