Notfallmedizin up2date, Inhaltsverzeichnis Notfallmedizin up2date 2012; 7(01): 5-8DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1298456 Schritt für Schritt Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York Videolaryngoskopie Clemens Kill , Wolfgang Dersch , Andreas Jerrentrup Artikel empfehlen Abstract Artikel einzeln kaufen Alle Artikel dieser Rubrik Volltext Referenzen Literatur 1 Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dorges V. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2010; 27: 24-30 2 Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology 2009; 110: 32-37 3 Hirabayashi Y, Fujita A, Seo N, Sugimoto H. Distortion of anterior airway anatomy during laryngoscopy with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope. J Anesth 2010; 24: 366-372 4 Turkstra TP, Craen RA, Pelz DM, Gelb AW. Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope. Anesth Analg 2005; 101: 910-915 5 Nakstad AR, Sandberg M. The GlideScope Ranger video laryngoscope can be useful in airway management of entrapped patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2009; 53: 1257-1261 6 Wayne MA, McDonnell M. Comparison of traditional versus video laryngoscopy in out-of-hospital tracheal intubation. Prehosp Emerg Care 2010; 14: 278-282 7 Kill C, Kratz T. [Difficult airway management in emergency and intensive care medicine. General method and technical innovations]. Intensivmed 2010; 47: 530-538