PDF herunterladen
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2012; 229(6): 608-614
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1299494
Übersicht
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Split-Cornea-Transplantation – ein neues Konzept gegen Spendermangel

Split-Cornea Transplantation – A Novel Concept to Reduce Corneal Donor Shortage
L. M. Heindl
,
C. Cursiefen
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

17. Januar 2012

22. Februar 2012

Publikationsdatum:
02. Mai 2012 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Die perforierende Keratoplastik ist bisher das Standardverfahren der Hornhauttransplantation. In den letzten Jahren haben sich jedoch die lamellären Techniken, wie die tiefe anteriore lamelläre Keratoplastik (DALK) mittels „big bubble“ und die posteriore lamelläre Keratoplastik mittels „Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty“ (DMEK) revolutioniert. Ziel dieser Arbeit ist es, die Split-Cornea-Transplantation mit der Kombination von DALK und DMEK als ein neues Konzept gegen den Hornhautspendermangel darzustellen.

Methoden: Der Beitrag bietet eine Literaturübersicht aus PUBMED und eigene klinische Ergebnisse.

Ergebnisse: Durch Teilung einer Spenderhornhaut in eine anteriore Lamelle (bestehend aus Epithel, Basalmembran, Bowman’scher Lamelle und Stroma) für eine DALK-Operation bei einem Patienten mit anterior-stromaler Hornhauterkrankung (z. B. Keratokonus) einerseits und eine posteriore Spenderlamelle (bestehend aus Descemet’scher Membran und Endothel) für eine DMEK-Operation bei einem Patienten mit endothelialer Hornhauterkrankung (z. B. Fuchs’sche Hornhautendotheldystrophie) andererseits kann der Bedarf an Hornhautspendergewebe um etwa 50 % reduziert werden. Im 6-Monats-Follow-up zeigten sich gute visuelle und refraktive Ergebnisse bei niedrigen Komplikationsraten und akzeptablen Endothelzellverlusten.

Schlussfolgerung: Die Split-Cornea-Transplantation mit Kombination von DALK und DMEK ist ein vielversprechendes, zukunftsträchtiges Konzept, dem Spendermangel im Bereich der Hornhauttransplantation zu begegnen.

Abstract

Background: Penetrating keratoplasty is at present the gold standard for corneal transplantation, but tremendous progress has been made in recent years in improving lamellar keratoplasty techniques, such as deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). The purpose of this report is to describe split-cornea transplantation by combining DALK and DMEK as a novel concept to reduce donor shortage.

Methods: The study consists of a PUBMED literature review and our own clinical results.

Results: Splitting of a single donor cornea into an anterior part (including epithelium, its basement membrane, Bowman layer, and stroma) for use in a DALK procedure in a patient with anterior-stromal disease (e. g., keratoconus) and into a posterior part (endothelium-Descemet membrane layer) for use in a DMEK procedure in a patient with endothelial disease (e. g., Fuchs endothelial dystrophy) can reduce the need for corneal donor tissue by around 50 %. A short-term 6-months follow-up has revealed good visual and refractive outcomes with low complication rates and acceptable endothelial cell loss.

Conclusion: Split-cornea transplantation by combining DALK and DMEK surgeries is a promising concept to reduce donor shortage in corneal transplantation surgery in the future.

Schlüsselwörter

Split-Cornea-Transplantation - lamelläre Keratoplastik - DALK - DMEK - Kornea

Key words

split-cornea transplantation - lamellar keratoplasty - DALK - DMEK - Cornea
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Rasouli M, Caraiscos VB, Slomovic AR. Efficacy of routine notification and request on reducing corneal transplantation wait times in Canada. Can J Ophthalmol 2009; 44: 31-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 De By TM. Shortage in the face of plenty: improving the allocation of corneas for transplantation. Dev Ophthalmol 2003; 36: 56-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Reinhard T, Böhringer D, Bogen A et al. The transplantation law: a chance to overcome the shortage of corneal grafts in germany?. Transplant Proc 2002; 34: 1322-1324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Otte JB, de Ville de Goyet J, Alberti D et al. The concept and technique of the split liver in clinical transplantation. Surgery 1990; 107: 605-612
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cintorino D, Spada M, Gruttadauria S et al. In situ split liver transplantation for adult and pediatric recipients: an answer to organ shortage. Transplant Proc 2006; 38: 1096-1098
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Naumann GO. The penetrating keratoplasty. A 100-year success story (in German). Ophthalmologe 2005; 102: 1128-1136, 1138-1139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cursiefen C, Küchle M, Naumann GO. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty: histopathology of 1,250 corneal buttons. Cornea 1998; 17: 468-470
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Anwar M, Teichmann KD. Big-bubble technique to bare Descemet’s membrane in anterior lamellar keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 398-403
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Parthasarathy A, Por YM, Tan DT. Use of a “small-bubble technique” to increase the success of Anwar’s “big-bubble technique” for deep lamellar keratoplasty with complete baring of Descemet’s membrane. Br J Ophthalmol 2007; 91: 1369-1373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Awan MA, Roberts F, Hegarty B et al. The outcome of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in herpes simplex virus-related corneal scarring. Complications and graft survival. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 1300-1303
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Reinhart WJ, Musch DC, Jacobs DS et al. Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty as an alternative to penetrating keratoplasty: a report by the american academy of ophthalmology. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 209-218
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Braun JM, Hofmann-Rummelt C, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U et al. Histopathological changes after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty using the “big-bubble technique”. Acta Ophthalmol 2011; (Epub ahead of print)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Cursiefen C, Heindl LM. Perspectives of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Ophthalmologe 2011; 108: 833-839
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Riss S, Heindl LM, Bachmann BO et al. Pentacam-based big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) in patients with keratoconus. Cornea 2012; (In press)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Riss S, Heindl LM, Bachmann BO et al. „Micro-bubble-incision“ as a new rescue technique for „big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK)“ with failed bubble formation. Cornea 2012; (In press)
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Price MO, Fairchild KM, Price DA et al. Descemet’s stripping endothelial keratoplasty: five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 725-729
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Price MO, Gorovoy M, Benetz BA et al. Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty outcomes compared with penetrating keratoplasty from the cornea donor study. Ophthalmology 2010; 117: 438-444
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Terry MA, Shamie N, Chen ES et al. Endothelial keratoplasty for Fuchs’ dystrophy with cataract: complications and clinical results with the new triple procedure. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 631-639
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) (in German). Ophthalmologe 2009; 106: 939-952
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Heindl LM, Hofmann-Rummelt C, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U et al. Histologic analysis of descemet stripping in posterior lamellar keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 461-464
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Heindl LM, Kruse FE, Cursiefen C. Complications after posterior lamellar keratoplasty (DSAEK): prevention, detection and treatment (in German). Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2010; 227: 478-482
    Artikel in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Melles GR, Lander F, Rietveld FJ. Transplantation of Descemet’s membrane carrying viable endothelium through a small scleral incision. Cornea 2002; 21: 415-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Melles GR, Ong TS, Ververs B et al. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 2006; 25: 987-990
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Melles GR. Posterior lamellar keratoplasty: DLEK to DSEK to DMEK. Cornea 2006; 25: 879-881
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Lie JT, Birbal R, Ham L et al. Donor tissue preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34: 1578-1583
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Ham L, Balachandran C, Verschoor CA et al. Visual rehabilitation rate after isolated Descemet membrane transplantation: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 2009; 127: 252-255
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ham L, Dapena I, Van Der Wees J et al. Endothelial cell density after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: 1- to 3-year follow-up. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149: 1016-1017
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Price MO, Giebel AW, Fairchild KM et al. Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty: prospective multicenter study of visual and refractive outcomes and endothelial survival. Ophthalmology 2009; 116: 2361-2368
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bachmann BO, Laaser K, Cursiefen C et al. A method to confirm correct orientation of Descemet membrane during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2010; 149: 922-925
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Cursiefen C, Kruse FE. DMEK: Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (in German). Ophthalmologe 2010; 107: 370-376
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Kruse FE, Laaser K, Cursiefen C et al. A stepwise approach to donor preparation and insertion increases safety and outcome of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Cornea 2011; 30: 580-587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Laaser K, Bachmann BO, Horn FK et al. Donor tissue culture conditions and outcome after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 151: 1007-1018
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Heindl LM, Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Cursiefen C et al. Myofibroblast metaplasia after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 151: 1019-1023
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Schlötzer-Schrehardt U, Bachmann BO, Laaser K et al. Characterization of the cleavage plane in Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 1950-1957
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Rudolph M, Laaser K, Bachmann BO et al. Corneal higher-order aberrations after Descemet’s membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 2011; Epub ahead of print
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Heindl LM, Riss S, Bachmann BO et al. Split cornea transplantation for 2 recipients: a new strategy to reduce corneal tissue cost and shortage. Ophthalmology 2011; 118: 294-301
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Vajpayee RB, Sharma N, Jhanji V et al. One donor cornea for 3 recipients: a new concept for corneal transplantation surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 2007; 125: 552-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Lie JT, Groeneveld-van Beek EA, Ham L et al. More efficient use of donor corneal tissue with Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK): two lamellar keratoplasty procedures with one donor cornea. Br J Ophthalmol 2010; 94: 1265-1266
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Heindl LM, Riss S, Bachmann BO et al. Split cornea transplantation for 2 recipients – review of the first 100 consecutive patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2011; 152: 523-532
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Heindl LM, Cursiefen C. One cornea, two patients: a potential new strategy for tackling donor shortage?. Exp Rev Ophthalmol 2011; 6: 273-276
    PubMedGoogle Scholar