ACL Reconstruction with Single Tibial Tunnel: Single Versus Double Bundle

Abstract

Double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is designed with the aim of reproducing the anatomy and the function of a healthy knee. This can be done by creating two femoral tunnels and one tibial tunnel (DB-3T), or two femoral and two tibial tunnels (DB-4T), There is very little comparative information regarding DB-3T, which is supposed to be more anatomical than DB-4T, and single bundle (SB). DB-3T reconstruction produces greater joint stability and clinical behavior than SB. Consecutive patients with a unilateral rupture of the ACL treated with the DB-3T technique, and a control group of 36 nonconcurrent patients, with similar conditions, treated with the SB technique were followed during 2 years. Anterior/posterior translation (APT), pivot-shift test, one-leg hop, and IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) subjective evaluations were performed. There were no significant differences in the reduction of APT. However, there was a significant improvement in the remaining parameters in the DB-3T group: greater reduction in rotational instability, greater one-leg hop capacity, and greater subjective evaluation. At the 2-year follow-up, patients having undergone ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons by means of a DB technique with a single tibial tunnel showed greater rotational stability, greater one-legged hop capacity, and a greater subjective evaluation than those having undergone SB reconstruction.

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament - anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - double bundle

• References

• 1 Fithian DC, Paxton EW, Stone ML , et al. Prospective trial of a treatment algorithm for the management of the anterior cruciate ligament-injured knee. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (3) 335-346
• 2 Duthon VB, Barea C, Abrassart S, Fasel JH, Fritschy D, Ménétrey J. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (3) 204-213
• 3 Petersen W, Zantop T. Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 454: 35-47
• 4 Siebold R, Ellert T, Metz S, Metz J. Femoral insertions of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament: morphometry and arthroscopic orientation models for double-bundle bone tunnel placement—a cadaver study. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (5) 585-592
• 5 Siebold R. Observations on bone tunnel enlargement after double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (3) 291-298
• 6 Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Kuriwaka M, Ito Y. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (4) 515-520
• 7 Bellier G, Christel P, Colombet P, Djian P, Franceschi JP, Sbihi A. Double-stranded hamstring graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (8) 890-894
• 8 Frank DA, Altman GT, Re P. Hybrid anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: introduction of a new technique for anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (12) 1354, e1-e5
• 9 Hamada M, Shino K, Horibe S , et al. Single- versus bi-socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous multiple-stranded hamstring tendons with endoButton femoral fixation: a prospective study. Arthroscopy 2001; 17 (8) 801-807
• 10 Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H, Tanabe Y, Yagi T. Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (9) 1675-1687
• 11 Kubo T, Hara K, Suginoshita T , et al. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the double bundle method. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2000; 8 (2) 59-63
• 12 Muneta T, Sekiya I, Yagishita K, Ogiuchi T, Yamamoto H, Shinomiya K. Two-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using semitendinosus tendon with endobuttons: operative technique and preliminary results. Arthroscopy 1999; 15 (6) 618-624
• 13 Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T , et al. A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 2007; 23 (6) 618-628
• 14 Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T. Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (2) 137-145
• 15 Yagi M, Kuroda R, Nagamune K, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M. Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 454: 100-107
• 16 Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H , et al. Anatomic reconstruction of the anteromedial and posterolateral bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (10) 1015-1025
• 17 Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H, Tanabe Y, Tohyama H. Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (3) 240-251
• 18 Takeuchi R, Saito T, Mituhashi S, Suzuki E, Yamada I, Koshino T. Double-bundle anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-hamstring-bone composite graft. Arthroscopy 2002; 18 (5) 550-555
• 19 Toritsuka Y, Amano H, Yamada Y , et al. Bi-socket ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons: high versus low femoral socket placement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2007; 15 (7) 835-846
• 20 Georgoulis AD, Ristanis S, Chouliaras V, Moraiti C, Stergiou N. Tibial rotation is not restored after ACL reconstruction with a hamstring graft. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 454: 89-94
• 21 Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlström K, Lind J. Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5-9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 2004; 75 (5) 594-599
• 22 Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, Vasiliadis HS, Giakas G, Georgoulis AD. Excessive tibial rotation during high-demand activities is not restored by anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (11) 1323-1329
• 23 Ristanis S, Stergiou N, Patras K, Tsepis E, Moraiti C, Georgoulis AD. Follow-up evaluation 2 years after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone graft shows that excessive tibial rotation persists. Clin J Sport Med 2006; 16 (2) 111-116
• 24 Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K, Kolowich P, Anderst W. Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (4) 975-983
• 25 Araki D, Kuroda R, Kubo S , et al. A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (3) 439-446
• 26 Toritsuka Y, Amano H, Kuwano M , et al. Outcome of double-bundle ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2009; 17 (5) 456-463
• 27 Sadoghi P, Müller PE, Jansson V, van Griensven M, Kröpfl A, Fischmeister MF. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a clinical comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone single bundle versus semitendinosus and gracilis double bundle technique. Int Orthop 2011; 35 (1) 127-133