Abstract
Double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is designed with
the aim of reproducing the anatomy and the function of a healthy knee. This can be
done by creating two femoral tunnels and one tibial tunnel (DB-3T), or two femoral
and two tibial tunnels (DB-4T), There is very little comparative information regarding
DB-3T, which is supposed to be more anatomical than DB-4T, and single bundle (SB).
DB-3T reconstruction produces greater joint stability and clinical behavior than SB.
Consecutive patients with a unilateral rupture of the ACL treated with the DB-3T technique,
and a control group of 36 nonconcurrent patients, with similar conditions, treated
with the SB technique were followed during 2 years. Anterior/posterior translation
(APT), pivot-shift test, one-leg hop, and IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee)
subjective evaluations were performed. There were no significant differences in the
reduction of APT. However, there was a significant improvement in the remaining parameters
in the DB-3T group: greater reduction in rotational instability, greater one-leg hop
capacity, and greater subjective evaluation. At the 2-year follow-up, patients having
undergone ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons by means of a DB technique with
a single tibial tunnel showed greater rotational stability, greater one-legged hop
capacity, and a greater subjective evaluation than those having undergone SB reconstruction.
Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament - anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - double bundle
