Validation of a Novel Smartphone Accelerometer-Based Knee Goniometer

Abstract

Loss of full knee extension following anterior cruciate ligament surgery has been shown to impair knee function. However, there can be significant difficulties in accurately and reproducibly measuring a fixed flexion of the knee. We studied the interobserver and the intraobserver reliabilities of a novel, smartphone accelerometer-based, knee goniometer and compared it with a long-armed conventional goniometer for the assessment of fixed flexion knee deformity. Five healthy male volunteers (age range 30 to 40 years) were studied. Measurements of knee flexion angle were made with a telescopic-armed goniometer (Lafayette Instrument, Lafayette, IN) and compared with measurements using the smartphone (iPhone 3GS, Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA) knee goniometer using a novel trigonometric technique based on tibial inclination. Bland–Altman analysis of validity and reliability including statistical analysis of correlation by Pearson’s method was undertaken. The iPhone goniometer had an interobserver correlation (r) of 0.994 compared with 0.952 for the Lafayette. The intraobserver correlation was r = 0.982 for the iPhone (compared with 0.927). The datasets from the two instruments correlate closely (r = 0.947) are proportional and have mean difference of only −0.4 degrees (SD 3.86 degrees). The Lafayette goniometer had an intraobserver reliability ± 9.6 degrees. The interobserver reliability was ± 8.4 degrees. By comparison the iPhone had an interobserver reliability ± 2.7 degrees and an intraobserver reliability ± 4.6 degrees. We found the iPhone goniometer to be a reliable tool for the measurement of subtle knee flexion in the clinic setting.

Keywords

fixed flexion - knee - goniometer - accelerometer

• References

• 1 Sachs RA, Daniel DM, Stone ML, Garfein RF. Patellofemoral problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 1989; 17 (6) 760-765
• 2 Shelbourne KD, Gray T. Minimum 10-year results after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how the loss of normal knee motion compounds other factors related to the development of osteoarthritis after surgery. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (3) 471-480
• 3 Boone DC, Azen SP, Lin CM, Spence C, Baron C, Lee L. Reliability of goniometric measurements. Phys Ther 1978; 58 (11) 1355-1360
• 4 Bovens AM, van Baak MA, Vrencken JG, Wijnen JA, Verstappen FT. Variability and reliability of joint measurements. Am J Sports Med 1990; 18 (1) 58-63
• 5 Edwards JZ, Greene KA, Davis RS, Kovacik MW, Noe DA, Askew MJ. Measuring flexion in knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19 (3) 369-372
• 6 Cleffken B, van Breukelen G, Brink P, van Mameren H, Olde Damink S. Digital goniometric measurement of knee joint motion. Evaluation of usefulness for research settings and clinical practice. Knee 2007; 14 (5) 385-389
• 7 Anderson M, Messner MB, Green WT. Distribution of lengths of the normal femur and tibia in children from one to eighteen years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1964; 46: 1197-1202
• 8 Ockendon M . Available at: http://www.ockendon.net 2010
• 9 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1 (8476) 307-310
• 10 Roe J, Pinczewski LA, Russell VJ, Salmon LJ, Kawamata T, Chew M. A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (9) 1337-1345
• 11 Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs K, Zurakowski D, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ. Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A (9) 1560-1572
• 12 Lenssen AF, van Dam EM, Crijns YH , et al. Reproducibility of goniometric measurement of the knee in the in-hospital phase following total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2007; 8: 83
• 13 Bennett D, Hanratty B, Thompson N, Beverland D. Measurement of knee joint motion using digital imaging. Int Orthop 2009; 33 (6) 1627-1631
• 14 Russell TG, Jull GA, Wootton R. Can the Internet be used as a medium to evaluate knee angle?. Man Ther 2003; 8 (4) 242-246
• 15 Austin MS, Ghanem E, Joshi A, Trappler R, Parvizi J, Hozack WJ. The assessment of intraoperative prosthetic knee range of motion using two methods. J Arthroplasty 2008; 23 (4) 515-521