A New Concept for Classifying Skull Base Defects for Reconstructive Surgery

Abstract

To classify the defects of the skull base, we present a new concept that is intuitive, simple to use, and consistent with subsequent reconstructive procedures. The centers of defects are determined in the anterior (I) or middle (II) skull base. The defects are classified as localized in the defect's center (Ia, IIa) or extended horizontally (Ib, IIb) or vertically (Ic, IIc) from the defect's center. Accompanying defects of the orbital contents and skin are indicated by “O” and “S,” respectively. An algorithm for selecting subsequent reconstructive procedures was based on the classification. Using the new system, we retrospectively reclassified 90 skull base defects and examined how the defect classifications were related to the reconstructive flaps used and postoperative complications. All defects were reclassified with the new system without difficulty or omission. The mean correlation rate was high (88%) between the flaps indicated by the new classification and the flaps that had actually been used. The rate of postoperative complications tended to be higher with Ia, Ic, and IIb defects and combined defects. Our new classification concept can be used to classify defects and to help select flaps used for subsequent reconstructive procedures.

Keywords

skull base - skull base defect - classification - reconstructive surgery

• References

• 1 Gil Z, Patel SG, Cantu G , et al; International Collaborative Study Group. Outcome of craniofacial surgery in children and adolescents with malignant tumors involving the skull base: an international collaborative study. Head Neck 2009; 31 (3) 308-317
• 2 Ganly I, Patel SG, Singh B , et al. Craniofacial resection for malignant tumors involving the skull base in the elderly: an international collaborative study. Cancer 2011; 117 (3) 563-571
• 3 Irish JC, Gullane PJ, Gentili F , et al. Tumors of the skull base: outcome and survival analysis of 77 cases. Head Neck 1994; 16 (1) 3-10
• 4 Hanasono MM, Sacks JM, Goel N, Ayad M, Skoracki RJ. The anterolateral thigh free flap for skull base reconstruction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2009; 140 (6) 855-860
• 5 Gil Z, Abergel A, Leider-Trejo L , et al. A comprehensive algorithm for anterior skull base reconstruction after oncological resections. Skull Base 2007; 17 (1) 25-37
• 6 Chiu ES, Kraus D, Bui DT , et al. Anterior and middle cranial fossa skull base reconstruction using microvascular free tissue techniques: surgical complications and functional outcomes. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60 (5) 514-520
• 7 Thurnher D, Novak CB, Neligan PC, Gullane PJ. Reconstruction of lateral skull base defects after tumor ablation. Skull Base 2007; 17 (1) 79-88
• 8 Yano T, Tanaka K, Kishimoto S, Iida H, Okazaki M. Reliability of and indications for pericranial flaps in anterior skull base reconstruction. J Craniofac Surg 2011; 22 (2) 482-485
• 9 Urken ML, Catalano PJ, Sen C, Post K, Futran N, Biller HF. Free tissue transfer for skull base reconstruction analysis of complications and a classification scheme for defining skull base defects. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993; 119 (12) 1318-1325
• 10 Yamamoto Y, Minakawa H, Kawashima K , et al. Experience with 24 cases of reconstructive anterior skull base surgery: classification and evaluation of postoperative facial appearance. Skull Base Surg 2000; 10 (2) 65-70
• 11 Pusic AL, Chen CM, Patel S, Cordeiro PG, Shah JP. Microvascular reconstruction of the skull base: a clinical approach to surgical defect classification and flap selection. Skull Base 2007; 17 (1) 5-15