Download PDF
J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2012; 73(04): 204-216
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1304815
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Early Survival of Comatose Patients after Severe Traumatic Brain Injury with the Dual Cannabinoid CB1/CB2 Receptor Agonist KN38-7271: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Trial

Raimund Firsching
1   Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
,
Jürgen Piek
2   Abteilung für Neurochirurgie, Chirurgische Universitätsklinik Rostock, Rostock, Germany
,
Martin Skalej
3   Zentrum für Radiologie, Institut für Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
,
Veit Rohde
4   Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
,
Uwe Schmidt
5   Biometrie, StatConsult Gesellschaft für klinische und Versorgungsforschung mbH, Magdeburg, Germany
,
Frank Striggow
6   KeyNeurotek Pharmaceuticals Ag, Magdeburg, Germany
7   Arbeitsgruppe Neurodegeneration und Interventionsstrategien, Deutsches Zentrum für Neurodegenerative Erkrankungen (DZNE), Magdeburg, Germany
,
the KN38-7271 Study Group › Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

30 August 2011

15 November 2011

Publication Date:
13 June 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background and Study Object Despite many drug trials, no substance has yet been identified that improves the outcome of severe head injury. The dual cannabinoid CB1/CB2 receptor agonist KN38-7271 mediates potent neuroprotection in animal models. We describe here the first randomized, double-blind, prospective, placebo-controlled clinical phase IIa proof-of-concept trial to investigate the safety, pharmacokinetics, and potential efficacy of a cannabinoid receptor agonist in humans.

Patients and Methods Out of the 439, 97 comatose patients at 14 European neurosurgical centers met the inclusion criteria. KN38-7271 was administered within 4.5 hours of the injury, and the patients received 1000, 500 μg, or placebo. The primary analysis was pharmacokinetic; efficacy was measured by survival and by neurological improvement or deterioration 7 and 14 days and 1, 3, and 6 months after the injury. Intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) were analyzed from start of treatment to end of day 7.

Results Survival rates within 1 month of the injury were significantly better in the treatment groups than in the placebo group (high-dose, Kaplan–Meier difference on day 30 + 0.12 with p = 0.043; low-dose, difference +0.15 with p = 0.011) but this effect was not seen after 6 months. Critical ICP and CPP were less extreme and less frequent in the treatment group. There were no severe and no serious adverse effects that could be attributed to KN38-7271.

Conclusions KN38-7271 appeared beneficial in the acute early phase of the comatose patient after a head injury. Its use was safe and well tolerated by patients. These results may provide the basis for further phase II/III trials in larger study populations.

Keywords

traumatic brain injury - severe head trauma - cannabinoids - cannabinoid receptor agonist

Supplementary Material

 

  • References

  • 1 Bruns Jr J, Hauser WA. The epidemiology of traumatic brain injury: a review. Epilepsia 2003; 44 (Suppl 10) 2-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Ghajar J. Traumatic brain injury. Lancet 2000; 356 (9233) 923-929
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Maas AI, Murray G, Henney III H , et al; Pharmos TBI investigators. Efficacy and safety of dexanabinol in severe traumatic brain injury: results of a phase III randomised, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5 (1) 38-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Roberts I, Yates D, Sandercock P , et al; CRASH trial collaborators. Effect of intravenous corticosteroids on death within 14 days in 10008 adults with clinically significant head injury (MRC CRASH trial): randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364 (9442) 1321-1328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Vink R, Nimmo AJ, Cernak I. An overview of new and novel pharmacotherapies for use in traumatic brain injury. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2001; 28 (11) 919-921
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Di Marzo V, Bifulco M, De Petrocellis L. The endocannabinoid system and its therapeutic exploitation. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004; 3 (9) 771-784
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Katona I, Freund TF. Endocannabinoid signaling as a synaptic circuit breaker in neurological disease. Nat Med 2008; 14 (9) 923-930
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Piomelli D, Giuffrida A, Calignano A, Rodríguez de Fonseca F. The endocannabinoid system as a target for therapeutic drugs. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2000; 21 (6) 218-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Marsicano G, Goodenough S, Monory K , et al. CB1 cannabinoid receptors and on-demand defense against excitotoxicity. Science 2003; 302 (5642) 84-88
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Nagayama T, Sinor AD, Simon RP , et al. Cannabinoids and neuroprotection in global and focal cerebral ischemia and in neuronal cultures. J Neurosci 1999; 19 (8) 2987-2995
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Eljaschewitsch E, Witting A, Mawrin C , et al. The endocannabinoid anandamide protects neurons during CNS inflammation by induction of MKP-1 in microglial cells. Neuron 2006; 49 (1) 67-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wolf SA, Tauber S, Ullrich O. CNS immune surveillance and neuroinflammation: endocannabinoids keep control. Curr Pharm Des 2008; 14 (23) 2266-2278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Mauler F, Hinz V, Augstein KH, Fassbender M, Horváth E. Neuroprotective and brain edema-reducing efficacy of the novel cannabinoid receptor agonist BAY 38-7271. Brain Res 2003; 989 (1) 99-111
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Mauler F, Horváth E, De Vry J , et al. BAY 38-7271: a novel highly selective and highly potent cannabinoid receptor agonist for the treatment of traumatic brain injury. CNS Drug Rev 2003; 9 (4) 343-358
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Brihaye J, Frowein RA, Lindgren S, Loew F, Stroobandt G. Report on the Meeting of the W.F.N.S. Neuro-Traumatology Committee, Brussels, 19–23 September 1976. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1978; 40: 181-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Frowein RA. Classification of coma. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1976; 34 (1-4) 5-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Firsching R, Woischneck D, Klein S, Reissberg S, Döhring W, Peters B. Classification of severe head injury based on magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2001; 143 (3) 263-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Firsching R, Woischneck D, Klein S, Ludwig K, Döhring W. Brain stem lesions after head injury. Neurol Res 2002; 24 (2) 145-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Firsching R, Roehl FW, Woischneck DH, John N, Skalej M. The predictive value of ICP as compared to magnetic resonance imaging in comatose patients after head injury. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2008; 102: 237-240
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 von Wild KR, Wenzlaff P. Quality management in traumatic brain injury (TBI): Lessons from the prospective study in 6800 patients after acute TBI in respect of neurorehabilitation. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 2005; 93: 15-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie: Leitlinie: Schädel-Hirn-Trauma im Erwachsenenalter 2007. Available at: www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/ll/008-001.html
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Bedell EA, Prough DS. Dexanabinol as a treatment for traumatic brain injury: will another therapeutic promise be broken?. Crit Care Med 2002; 30 (3) 710-711
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Belayev L, Busto R, Zhao W, Ginsberg MD. HU-211, a novel noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist, improves neurological deficit and reduces infarct volume after reversible focal cerebral ischemia in the rat. Stroke 1995; 26 (12) 2313-2319 , discussion 2319–2320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Brewster ME, Pop E, Foltz RL , et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of escalating i.v. doses of dexanabinol (HU-211), a neuroprotectant agent, in normal volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther 1997; 35 (9) 361-365
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Feigenbaum JJ, Bergmann F, Richmond SA , et al. Nonpsychotropic cannabinoid acts as a functional N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blocker. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989; 86 (23) 9584-9587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Knoller N, Levi L, Shoshan I , et al. Dexanabinol (HU-211) in the treatment of severe closed head injury: a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II clinical trial. Crit Care Med 2002; 30 (3) 548-554
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Mechoulam R, Feigenbaum JJ, Lander N , et al. Enantiomeric cannabinoids: stereospecificity of psychotropic activity. Experientia 1988; 44 (9) 762-764
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Miller JD. Prediction of outcome after head injury. A critical review. In: Vigouroux RP, McLaurin RL, eds. Advances in Neurotraumatology, Extracerebral collections. Vol. 1. Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag; 1986: 230-247
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Moskopp D, Stähle C, Wassmann H. Problems of the Glasgow Coma Scale with early intubated patients. Neurosurg Rev 1995; 18 (4) 253-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Balestreri M, Czosnyka M, Chatfield DA , et al. Predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004; 75 (1) 161-162
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Marshall LF, Marshall SB, Klauber MR, van Berkum M, Clark RN. A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography. J Neurosurg 1991; 75: S14-S20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Firsching R, Woischneck D, Diedrich M , et al. Early magnetic resonance imaging of brainstem lesions after severe head injury. J Neurosurg 1998; 89 (5) 707-712
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Keenan HT, Nocera M, Bratton SL. Frequency of intracranial pressure monitoring in infants and young toddlers with traumatic brain injury. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2005; 6 (5) 537-541
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Thompson HJ, Rivara FP, Jurkovich GJ, Wang J, Nathens AB, MacKenzie EJ. Evaluation of the effect of intensity of care on mortality after traumatic brain injury. Crit Care Med 2008; 36 (1) 282-290
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Shafi S, Diaz-Arrastia R, Madden C, Gentilello L. Intracranial pressure monitoring in brain-injured patients is associated with worsening of survival. J Trauma 2008; 64 (2) 335-340
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar