Prospective multicenter evaluation of colon capsule examination indicated by colonoscopy failure or anesthesia contraindication

Background and study aims: In France, in about 5 % of cases colonoscopies are incomplete or temporarily contraindicated. We tested the diagnostic yield of colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) in these patients.

Patients and methods: In a prospective study, in 17 French centers, inclusion criteria were colonoscopy failure or general disease that excluded colonoscopy with anesthesia. Patients underwent CCE using the first-generation PillCam Colon capsule. The main end point was CCE diagnostic yield, defined as identification of a colorectal lesion that directly explained symptoms or necessitated a diagnostic or therapeutic examination. A secondary objective was to test a simplified MoviPrep colon cleansing. Follow-up to identify missed symptomatic cancer was scheduled.

Results: CCE showed positive findings in 36 patients (diagnostic yield 33.6 %), among whom 23 subsequently underwent therapeutic intervention. Among 64 patients with negative capsule findings, 9 had a complementary procedure showing adenomas in only 1 case. CCE was incomplete in 7/107 patients. Colonoscopy was done in one patient to retrieve a capsule retained in the left colon, and sigmoidoscopy in 11 because the rectum was not reached. No colorectal cancer was diagnosed during the follow-up period. Colon cleansing with MoviPrep was rated good or excellent in 75.9 % of cases.

Conclusion: This study shows the feasibility and the usefulness of CCE in the situation of colonoscopy failure or contraindication. The colon capsule modality should be tested against other available approaches, such as virtual colonoscopy or repeat colonoscopy by an expert.

• References

• 1 Canard JM, Debette-Gratien M, Dumas R et al. A prospective national study on colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in 2000 in France. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2005; 29: 17-22
• 2 Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology 2005; 237: 893-904
• 3 Gay G, Delvaux M. Small-bowel endoscopy. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 140-146
• 4 Eliakim R. Video capsule endoscopy of the small bowel. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2008; 24: 159-163
• 5 Triester SL, Leighton JA, Leontiadis GI et al. A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn's disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 954-964
• 6 Leighton JA, Triester SL, Sharma VK. Capsule endoscopy: a meta-analysis for use with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and Crohn’s disease. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2006; 16: 229-250
• 7 Pioche M, Gaudin JL, Filoche B et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of two small-bowel capsule endoscopy systems in patients with obscure GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 1181-1188
• 8 Eliakim R, Fireman Z, Gralnek IM et al. Evaluation of the PillCam Colon capsule in the detection of colonic pathology: results of the first multicenter, prospective, comparative study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 963-970
• 9 Schoofs N, Deviere J, Van Gossum A. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy for colorectal tumor diagnosis: a prospective pilot study. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 971-977
• 10 Van Gossum A, Munoz-Navas M, Fernandez-Urien I et al. Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 264-270
• 11 Spada C, Hassan C, Munoz-Navas M et al. Second-generation colon capsule endoscopy compared with colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 74: 581-9
• 12 Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y et al. Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2009; 41: 1026-1031
• 13 Haute Autorité de Santé (HAS). Endoscopie digestive basse: indications. Recommandations. 2004 Available at: http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/upload/docs/application/pdf/endoscopie_2004_recommandations_mise_en_forme_2006.pdf
• 14 Aronchick CA. Bowel preparation scale. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 1037-1038 ; author reply 1038-1039
• 15 Metcalf JV, Smith J, Jones R, Record CO. Incidence and causes of rectal bleeding in general practice as detected by colonoscopy. Br J Gen Pract 1996; 46: 161-164
• 16 Exbrayat C, Garnier A, Billette De Villemeur A et al. [Yield of colonoscopy by indication and consequences for colorectal polyp and cancer screening: a prospective survey in Isere, France]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2002; 26: 225-230
• 17 Yucel C, Lev-Toaff AS, Moussa N, Durrani H. CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008; 190: 145-150
• 18 Sali L, Falchini M, Bonanomi AG et al. CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 4499-4504
• 19 Pasha SF, Harrison ME, Das A et al. Utility of double-balloon colonoscopy for completion of colon examination after incomplete colonoscopy with conventional colonoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 848-853
• 20 Gay G, Delvaux M. Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 788-792
• 21 Moreels TG, Macken EJ, Roth B et al. Cecal intubation rate with the double-balloon endoscope after incomplete conventional colonoscopy: a study in 45 patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25: 80-83
• 22 Spada C, Hassan C, Ingrosso M et al. A new regimen of bowel preparation for PillCam colon capsule endoscopy: a pilot study. Dig Liver Dis 2011; 43: 300-304
• 23 Spada C, Riccioni ME, Hassan C et al. PillCam colon capsule endoscopy: a prospective, randomized trial comparing two regimens of preparation. J Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 45: 119-124