Validity of insertion depth measurement in double-balloon endoscopy

Background and study aims: In double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) the use of a reliable and practical method to calculate the insertion depth of the endoscope could help to improve diagnosis accuracy and optimize the effort and cost of the technique. The objectives of this work were to compare and evaluate two methods of estimating the insertion depth and to obtain a descriptive model capable of representing the exploration dynamics and efficiency in terms of advanced distance and time.

Methods: Oral DBE was performed in 25 pigs. Insertion depth was calculated during the procedure by: 1) estimation of time and distance for each push and pull cycle during progression; and 2) estimation of distance during withdrawal. At the maximum insertion depth a tattoo was placed, and the observed measures for the two methods were compared with the distance between the pylorus and the mark after euthanasia and necropsy of the animals 1 week after DBE.

Results: The average insertion depth during progression, withdrawal, and after necropsy was 324.92 cm, 317.23 cm, and 342.05 cm, respectively (P _Anova = 0.72). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r > 0.85; P  < 0.001) and paired Brand – Altman plots demonstrated high agreement between progression and necropsy (0.03 % difference) and between withdrawal and necropsy (6.9 % difference). The exploration dynamics and efficiency in terms of advanced distance per cycle and time fitted to potential and logarithmic regression models, respectively.

Conclusions: Measurement of insertion depth in vivo was validated in the porcine model during progression and withdrawal. Estimation during progression was more accurate and allowed exploration dynamics and efficiency to be plotted, which might be used as approximate reference values for humans.

• References

• 1 May A, Färber M, Aschmoneit I et al. Prospective multicenter trial comparing push-and-pull enteroscopy with the single- and double-balloon techniques in patients with small-bowel disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 575-581
• 2 May A. How much importance do we have to place on complete enteroscopy?. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 740-742
• 3 Matsumoto T, Moriyama T, Esaki M et al. Performance of antegrade double-balloon enteroscopy: comparison with push enteroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 392-398
• 4 Mehdizadeh S, Ross A, Gerson L et al. What is the learning curve associated with double-balloon enteroscopy? Technical details and early experience in 6 U.S. tertiary care centers.. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 740-750
• 5 Manner H, May A, Pohl J et al. Impact of fluoroscopy on oral double-balloon enteroscopy: results of a randomized trial in 156 patients. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 820-826
• 6 May A, Nachbar L, Schneider M et al. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using the double-balloon technique: method of assessing depth of insertion and training of the enteroscopy technique using the Erlangen Endo-Trainer. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 66-70
• 7 Gerson LB, Flodin JT, Miyabayashi K. Balloon-assisted enteroscopy: technology and troubleshooting. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 68: 1158-1167
• 8 Sugano K, Marcon N. The First International Workshop on Double Balloon Endoscopy: a consensus meeting report. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 7-11
• 9 Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 327 (8476) 307-310
• 10 Lo SK, Mehdizadeh S. Estimation of the depth of double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) passage in the small intestine: is it possible to simplify the process?. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: AB263
• 11 Schembre DB, Ross AS. Spiral enteroscopy: a new twist on overtube-assisted endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 333-336
• 12 Heine GD, Hadithi M, Groenen MJ et al. Double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, diagnostic yield, and complications in a series of 275 patients with suspected small-bowel disease. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 42-48
• 13 Pata C, Akyuz U, Erzin Y et al. Post-procedure elevated amylase and lipase levels after double-balloon enteroscopy: relations with the double-balloon technique. Digest Dis Sci 2010; 55: 1982-1988
• 14 Gross SA, Stark ME. Initial experience with double-balloon enteroscopy at U.S. center. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: 890-897
• 15 Ell C, May A, Nachbar L et al. Push-and-pull enteroscopy in the small bowel using the double-balloon technique: results of a prospective European multicenter study. Endoscopy 2005; 37: 613-616
• 16 Di Caro S, May A, Heine D et al. The European experience with double-balloon enteroscopy: indications, methodology, safety, and clinical impact. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 545-550
• 17 Jones BH, Harrison ME, Fleischer DE et al. Double Balloon Enteroscopy (DBE): new information and limitations defined. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: AB229
• 18 Soria F, Lopez Albors O, Morcillo E et al. Experimental laparoscopic evaluation of double balloon versus spiral enteroscopy in an animal model. Digest Endoscopy 2011; 23: 98
• 19 May A. Performing double-balloon enteroscopy: the utility of the Erlangen EndoTrainer. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 10: 54-58
• 20 Latorre R, Soria F, López Albors O et al. Anatomy study of the pig intestine aimed to define a swine model for double balloon enteroscopy. Surg Radiol Anat 2009; 31: 169-170
• 21 Maiss J, Diebel H, Naegel A et al. A novel model for training in ERCP with double-balloon enteroscopy after abdominal surgery. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 1072-1075