Re-envisioning Collaboration, Hierarchy, and Transparency in Audiology Education, Practice, and Research

Abstract

In this article five audiologists reflect individually and as a group on three perceived key challenges for their “cohort” of audiology clinicians, educators, and researchers. These three challenges were chosen based on practice, teaching and preceptoring, and research experiences and were inspired by related literature outside the young field of audiology. Audiology has the opportunity to look to older health professions that have faced similar challenges. The three challenges chosen for discussion were: collaboration, hierarchy, and transparency. A reflective dialogue ensued in which the group did not always come to an agreement. Yet the presentation of both our distinct and similar perspectives demonstrates the potentially generative and critical insights that can arise when we question the status quo and imagine what could be. This article is neither a research paper nor a literature review by any means. Rather, it serves as an invitation to ourselves and our colleagues to ask difficult questions about the way we are and to try to see ourselves through the eyes of others. In this way, as a new cohort, we may be able to continue to advance the field that has been built by audiology clinicians, educators, and researchers who came before us. And we strive to do this alongside the existing leaders who continue to work hard for audiology during challenging and changing times. Perhaps a critically reflective dialogue drawing from multiple perspectives can help us continue to improve, as a collective field, in a challenging economic climate.

Keywords

collaboration - critical reflection - dialogue - ethics - hierarchy - transparency

• References

• 1 Brookfield S. Critically reflective practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof 1998; 18: 197-205
• 2 Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (3) CD000072 (Review)
• 3 Greiner AC, Knebel E. Health Professions Education: A Bridge to Quality. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003
• 4 Mitchell PH, Belza B, Schaad DC , et al. Working across the boundaries of health professions disciplines in education, research, and service: the University of Washington experience. Acad Med 2006; 81: 891-896
• 5 Health Force Ontario. Implementing Interprofessional Care in Ontario. Toronto, Ontario; Government of Ontario: 2010
• 6 Robinson M, Cottrell D. Health professionals in multi-disciplinary and multi-agency teams: changing professional practice. J Interprof Care 2005; 19: 547-560
• 7 Milbourne L. Children, families and inter-agency work: experiences of partnership work in primary education settings. Br Educ Res J 2005; 31: 675-695
• 8 Cameron A, Lart R. Factors promoting and obstacles hindering joint working: a systematic review of the research evidence. Journal of Integrated Care 2003; 11: 9-17
• 9 Doyle J. Barriers and facilitators of multidisciplinary team working: a review. Paediatr Nurs 2008; 20: 26-29
• 10 O'Dowd A. Joint working in health and social care remains patchy despite years of effort. BMJ 2011; 343: d7844-d7844
• 11 Roberts SF, Fischhoff MA, Sakowski SA, Feldman EL. Transforming science into medicine: How clinician-scientists can build bridges across research's “valley of death”. Acad Med 2012; 87: 266-270
• 12 Knottnerus JA, Dinant GJ. Medicine based evidence, a prerequisite for evidence based medicine. BMJ 1997; 315: 1109-1110
• 13 Dickenson DL. Are medical ethicists out of touch? Practitioner attitudes in the US and UK towards decisions at the end of life. J Med Ethics 2000; 26: 254-260
• 14 Gonzales R, Ackerman S. A framework for training health professionals in implementation and dissemination science. Acad Med 2012; 87: 271-278
• 15 Whiteford G. Knowledge, power, evidence: a critical analysis of key issues in evidence-based practice. In: Whiteford G, Wright-St Clair VW, eds. Occupation and Practice in Context. Marrickville, NSW: Elsevier; 2005: 34-50
• 16 Hays R. Developing as a health professional educator: pathways and choices. Clin Teach 2007; 4: 46-50
• 17 Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. 30th Anniversary ed. New York, NY: Continuum; 2007
• 18 Fox C. Beyond the “tyranny of the real”: revisiting Burke's pented as research method for professional communication. Tech Commun Q 2002; 11: 365-388
• 19 Kumagai AK, Lypson ML. Beyond cultural competence: critical consciousness, social justice, and multicultural education. Acad Med 2009; 84: 782-787
• 20 Hafferty FW, Franks R. The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education. Acad Med 1994; 69: 861-871
• 21 Ng S, Bartlett D, Lucy SD. The education and socialization of audiology students and novoices. Semin Hear 2012; 33: 177-195
• 22 Doyle LW, Freeman BA. Professionalism and the audiology student: characteristics of master's versus doctoral degree students. J Am Acad Audiol 2002; 13: 121-131
• 23 Blumenthal D, Causino N, Campbell E, Louis KS. Relationships between academic institutions and industry in the life sciences—an industry survey. N Engl J Med 1996; 334: 368-373
• 24 Djulbegovic B, Lacevic M, Cantor A , et al. The uncertainty principle and industry-sponsored research. Lancet 2000; 356: 635-638
• 25 Hermans J, Castiaux A. Knowledge creation through university-industry collaborative research projects. Electron J Knowl Manage 2007; 5: 43-54
• 26 Sininger Y , et al. Guidelines for ethical practice in research for audiologists. Audiology Today 2003; 15: 14-17