Download PDF
ZWR - Das Deutsche Zahnärzteblatt 2012; 121(3): 90-92
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1311749
Wissenschaft
Funktionsdiagnostik
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Zusammenhang von Belastungsvektoren und ätiologischen Faktoren im Rahmen der erweiterten Funktionsanalyse – Teil 2: Grundlagen der EAEF und Auswertung

Correlation Between Biomechanical Loading Vectors and Etiological Factors of CMD as Additional Examination of Functional Analysis – Basics of EAEF and Evaluation
A Fasold
,
B Kordaß
,
A Bumann
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
31 March 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Die elektronische Analyse ätiologischer Faktoren wurde als ein Zusatzmodul des ArcusDigma II (EAEF; entwickelt von Prof. Bumann; KaVo/Biberach) zur Überprüfung eines kausalen Zusammenhangs zwischen craniomandibulären Dysfunktionen (CMD) und der statischen und dynamischen Okklusion sowie Parafunktionen herangezogen. Bei 55 Patienten mit unterschiedlichen CMD-Beschwerden wurde eine manuelle Strukturanalyse (MSA) durchgeführt, wobei 20 Patienten mit einem spezifischen reproduzierbaren Belastungsvektor zur weiterführenden Untersuchung mithilfe der EAEF selektiert wurden. Es konnten bei 95 % Patienten reproduzierbare statische Okklusalvektoren und bei allen Patienten reproduzierbare dynamische Okklusalvektoren nachgewiesen werden. Für die Untersuchung eines kausalen Zusammenhangs zwischen Belastungs- und Bruxismusvektor konnte lediglich eine schwache Übereinstimmung aufgezeigt werden.

The electronic analysis of etiological factors (EAEF; inaugurated by Prof. Bumann) was performed as additional module of Arcus digma 2 system (Comp, KaVo Biberach, Germany) in order to evaluate the dependance between CMD-signs,, static and dynamic occlusion and parafunctional behaviour. 55 patients with different CMD-symptoms were examined by using techniques of manual structural analysis MSA). 20 patients with a specific loading vector could be selected for EAEF. Specific static occlusion vectors resulted in 95 % of the patients; within all patients dynamic occlusion vectors arose. The correlation between occlusion vectors and vectors of bruxism was significant, but weak.

Schlüsselwörter

EAEF - craniomandibuläre Dysfunktionen (CMD) - Belastungsvektor - Okklusalvektor - statische und dynamische Okklusion

Key words

Craniomandibular Disorders (CMD) - Clinical Structure Analysis - Loading Vector - Occlusion Vector - Static Occlusion - Dynamic Occlusion
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Dulcic N, Panduric J, Kraljevic S et al. Incidence of temporomandibular disorders at tooth loss in the supporting zones. Coll Antropol 2003; 27 (Suppl. 02) 61-67
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Eberhardt A. Okklusion in der Statik als Risikofaktor für kraniomandibuläre Dysfunktion. [Dissertation] Universität Leipzig 2002
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Glaros AG, Tabacchi KN, Glass EG. Effect of parafunctional clenchingon TMD pain. J Orof Pain 1998; 12: 145-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Goulet JP, Lavigne GJ, Lund JP. Jaw pain prevalence among French-speaking Canadians in Quebec and related symptoms of temporomandibular disorders. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1738-1744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hesse JR, van Loon LA, Naeije M. Subjective pain report and the outcome of several orthopaedic tests in craniomandibular disorder patients with recent pain complaints. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 483-489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Huang GJ, Le Resche L, Critchlow CW et al. Risk factors for diagnostic subgroups of painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD). J Dent Res 2002; 81: 284-288
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 John MT, Frank H, Lobezzoo F et al. No association between incisal tooth wear and temporomandibular disorders. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 197-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kawano M, Fujisawa M, Kanemura K. 2429 Prospective cohort study of occlusion associated with TMD. Prosthodont Res Pract 2005; 72: 79-79
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Klasser GD, Greene CS. The changing field of temporomandibular disorder: what dentists need to know. J Can Dent Assoc 2009; 75: 49-53
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Le Resche L. Epidemiology of orofacial pain. In: Orofacial pain. From basic science to clinical management. The transfer of knowledge in pain fron research to education. In: Lund JP, Lavigne GJ, Dubner R, et al. . Hrsg. Chicago: Quintessence; 2001: 15-25
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Luther F. TMD and occlusion part II. Damned if we don't? Functional occlusal problems: TMD epidemiology in a wider context. Br Dent J 2007; 10: 238-239
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Magnusson T, Carlsson GE, Egermark J. Changes in subjective symptoms of craniomandibular disorders in children and adolescents during a 10-year period. J Orofac Pain 1993; 7: 76-82
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Minacuchi H, Kuboki T, Matsuka Y et al. Randomized controlled evaluation of non-surgical treatments for temporomandibular joint anterior disc displacement without reduction. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 924-928
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Molina OF, dos Santos JuniorF, Nelson SJ et al. Profile of TMD and Bruxer compared to TMD and Nonbruxer patients regarding chief complaint, previous consultations, modes of therapy and chronicity. Cranio 2000; 18: 205-219
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Nishigawa K, Nakano M, Bando E. Study of jaw movement and masticatory muscle activity during unilateral chewing with and without balancing side molar contacts. J Oral Rehabil 1997; 24: 691-696
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Pullinger AG, Seligman DA, Gornbein JA. A multiple logistic regression analysis of the risk and relative odds of temporomandibular disorders as a function of common occlusal features. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 968-979
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rugh JD, Harlan J. Nocturnal bruxism and temporomandibular disorders. Adv Neurol 1988; 49: 329-341
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Sarita PT, Kreulen CM, Witter D et al. Signs and symptoms associated with TMD in adults with shortened dental arches. Int J Prostodont 2003; 16: 265-270
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Seligman DA, Pullinger AG, Solberg WK. The prevalence of dental attrition and its association with factors of age, gender, occlusion and TMD symptomatology. J Dent Res 1988; 67: 1323-1333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Seligman DA, Pullinger AG. The role of functional occlusal relationships in temporomandibular disorders: a review. J Craniomandib Disord 1991; 5: 265-279
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tsolka P, Walter JD, Wilson R-F et al. Occlusal variables, bruxism and temporomandibular disorders: a clinical and kinesiographic assessment. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 849-856
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Vanderas AP. Relationship between craniomandibular dysfunction and oral parafunctions in Caucasian children with and without unpleasant life events. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 289-294
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Widmalm SE, Christiansen RL, Gunn SM. Oral parafunctions as temporomandibular disorder risk factors in children. Cranio 1995; 13: 242-246
    PubMedGoogle Scholar