TumorDiagnostik & Therapie 2012; 33(4): 224-229
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1312850
Thieme Onkologie aktuell
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Radioembolisation von nicht-resektablen neuroendokrinen Lebermetastasen

Radioembolization of Unresectable Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases
P. M. Paprottka
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Campus Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
,
A. Haug
2   Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Campus Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
,
C. Zech
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Campus Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
,
W. H. Sommer
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Campus Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
,
P. Bartenstein
2   Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Campus Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
,
M. F. Reiser
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Campus Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
,
C. Trumm
1   Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Campus Großhadern, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
15 June 2012 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung: Die Therapieoptionen für Patienten mit neuroendokrinen Lebermetastasen (Neuroendocrine Tumor Liver Metastases/NETLMs) haben sich in den letzten Jahren deutlich verbessert. Ein neuer Ansatz zur Therapie von NETLMs ist die intraarterielle Therapie unter Verwendung von 90Yttrium-beschichteten Harz- (SIR-Spheres®, Sirtex Medical Ltd®, Lane Cove, Australia) oder Glasmikrosphären (TheraSphere®, MDS- Nordion Inc®, Ontario, Canada).

Material und Methoden: Der Autor sichtete die aktuelle Literatur in Bezug auf die Radioembolisation bei NETLMs und fasste die Ergebnisse (Tumoransprechen, Toxizität, Veränderung der klinischen Symptome, prognostische Faktoren) zusammen.

Ergebnisse: Das behandelte Patientenkollektiv ist relativ homogen und durch eine Vielzahl von vorausgegangenen Therapien gekennzeichnet. Das mediane Alter liegt bei ca. 60 Jahren. Die Disease Control Rate schwankt in den einzelnen Studien zwischen 65 % und 99 %, daraus resultierend ergibt sich für die Radioembolisation mit Harzmikrosphären eine mediane Überlebenszeit von 28 – 70 Monaten. Die frühen und späten Toxizitäten nach den Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 fallen im Vergleich zu Lebermetastasen anderer Tumore als auch zu anderen intraarteriellen Therapien deutlich geringer aus. Die beobachtete Verbesserung der prätherapeutisch symptomatischen Patienten variiert von 75 – 94,5 %. Einen signifikanten Einfluss auf das Überleben haben eine geringe Tumorlast, das weibliche Geschlecht, gut differenzierte Tumore, eine fehlende extrahepatische Tumorlast sowie eine partielle Remission bzw. Stable Disease nach 3 Monaten.

Schlussfolgerung: Die Radioembolisation mit 90Y beschichteten Mikrosphären ist eine sichere und effektive Therapieoption für Patienten mit therapierefraktären NETLMs. Der anti-tumorale Effekt wird durch die gute lokale Tumorkontrolle (RECIST), das verlängerte Überleben als auch die Verbesserung der klinischen Symptome bewiesen. Um den genauen Standpunkt der Radioembolisation im Therapieregime bei NETLMs zu evaluieren, sind weitere prospektive Studien dringend notwendig.

Abstract

Introduction: Treatment options for neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases (NETLMs) have evolved in recent years. A novel approach to hepatic metastases involves arterial embolization of 90Y either embedded in a resin microsphere (SIR-Spheres®, Sirtex Medical Ltd®, Lane Cove, Australia) or a glass microsphere (TheraSphere®, MDS-Nordion Inc®, Ontario, Canada).

Material and Methods: The author reviewed the recent literature on radioembolization for NETLMs and summarized the results according to tumor response, toxicity, eventual improvement of clinical symptoms and prognostic factors.

Results: The patient population is fairly homogenous, heavily pretreated with a median age of 60 years. The Disease Contol rate varies in different studies between 65 % and 99 %. As a result, the median survival time is 28 – 70 months for radioembolization using resin microspheres. The early and late toxicities, according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0, are in comparison to liver metastases of other tumors as well as to other intra-arterial therapies significantly lower. The observed improvement in pre-therapeutically symptomatic patients varies between 75 % and 94.5 %. A low tumor burden, the female gender, a well-differentiated tumor, no extrahepatic tumor burden, and PR or SD after 3 months are significant factors with respect to survival.

Conclusions: Radioembolization with 90Y resin microspheres is a safe and effective treatment option in patients with otherwise treatment-refractory NETLMs. Antitumoral effect is supported by good local tumor control (RECIST), prolonged survival and improved clinical symptoms. Further prospective investigation is necessary to define the role of radioembolization in the treatment paradigm of NETLMs.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Akerstrom G, Hellman P, Hessman O et al. Management of midgut carcinoids. J Surg Oncol 2005; 89: 161-169
  • 2 Brown KT, Koh BY, Brody LA et al. Particle embolization of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases for control of pain and hormonal symptoms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10: 397-403
  • 3 Cao CQ, Yan TD, Bester L et al. Radioembolization with yttrium microspheres for neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 537-543
  • 4 Capella C, Heitz PU, Hofler H et al. Revised classification of neuroendocrine tumours of the lung, pancreas and gut. Virchows Arch 1995; 425: 547-560
  • 5 Caprotti R, Angelini C, Mussi C et al. Gastrointestinal carcinoids. Prognosis and survival. Minerva Chir 2003; 58 (523 – 528) 529-532
  • 6 Capurso G, Bettini R, Rinzivillo M et al. Role of Resection of the Primary Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumour Only in Patients with Unresectable Metastatic Liver Disease: A Systematic Review. Neuroendocrinology
  • 7 Clouse ME, Perry L, Stuart K et al. Hepatic arterial chemoembolization for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. Digestion 1994; 55 (Suppl. 03) 92-97
  • 8 Eriksson BK, Larsson EG, Skogseid BM et al. Liver embolizations of patients with malignant neuroendocrine gastrointestinal tumors. Cancer 1998; 83: 2293-2301
  • 9 Gray B, Van Hazel G, Hope M et al. Randomised trial of SIR-Spheres plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone for treating patients with liver metastases from primary large bowel cancer. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: 1711-1720
  • 10 Gupta S, Johnson MM, Murthy R et al. Hepatic arterial embolization and chemoembolization for the treatment of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: variables affecting response rates and survival. Cancer 2005; 104: 1590-1602
  • 11 Hoffmann RT, Paprottka PM, Schon A et al. l Transarterial Hepatic Yttrium-90 Radioembolization in Patients with Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Factors Associated with Prolonged Survival. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
  • 12 Jakobs TF, Hoffmann RT, Tatsch K et al. Therapy response of liver tumors after selective internal radiation therapy. Radiologe 2008; 48: 839-849
  • 13 Kalinowski M, Dressler M, Konig A et al. Selective internal radiotherapy with Yttrium-90 microspheres for hepatic metastatic neuroendocrine tumors: a prospective single center study. Digestion 2009; 79: 137-142
  • 14 Kennedy AS, Dezarn WA, McNeillie P et al. Radioembolization for unresectable neuroendocrine hepatic metastases using resin 90Y-microspheres: early results in 148 patients. Am J Clin Oncol 2008; 31: 271-279
  • 15 King J, Quinn R, Glenn DM et al. Radioembolization with selective internal radiation microspheres for neuroendocrine liver metastases. Cancer 2008; 113: 921-929
  • 16 Kloppel G, Heitz PU, Capella C et al. Pathology and nomenclature of human gastrointestinal neuroendocrine (carcinoid) tumors and related lesions. World J Surg 1996; 20: 132-141
  • 17 Madoff DC, Gupta S, Ahrar K et al. Update on the management of neuroendocrine hepatic metastases. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17: 1235-1249 quiz 1250
  • 18 McDermott EW, Guduric B, Brennan MF. Prognostic variables in patients with gastrointestinal carcinoid tumours. Br J Surg 1994; 81: 1007-1009
  • 19 McStay MK, Maudgil D, Williams M et al. Large-volume liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors: hepatic intraarterial 90Y-DOTA-lanreotide as effective palliative therapy. Radiology 2005; 237: 718-726
  • 20 Modlin IM, Kidd M, Latich I et al. Current status of gastrointestinal carcinoids. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 1717-1751
  • 21 Modlin IM, Sandor A. An analysis of 8305 cases of carcinoid tumors. Cancer 1997; 79: 813-829
  • 22 Moertel CG, Johnson CM, McKusick MA et al. The management of patients with advanced carcinoid tumors and islet cell carcinomas. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120: 302-309
  • 23 Murthy R, Nunez R, Szklaruk J et al. Yttrium-90 microsphere therapy for hepatic malignancy: devices, indications, technical considerations, and potential complications. Radiographics 2005; 25 (Suppl. 01) S41-S55
  • 24 Oberg K. Carcinoid tumors: molecular genetics, tumor biology, and update of diagnosis and treatment. Curr Opin Oncol 2002; 14: 38-45
  • 25 Osborne DA, Zervos EE, Strosberg J et al. Improved outcome with cytoreduction versus embolization for symptomatic hepatic metastases of carcinoid and neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 2006; 13: 572-581
  • 26 Paprottka PM, Hoffmann RT, Haug A et al. Radioembolization of Symptomatic, Unresectable Neuroendocrine Hepatic Metastases Using Yttrium-90 Microspheres. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011;
  • 27 Paprottka PM, Jakobs TF, Reiser MF et al. Practical Vascular Anatomy in the Preparation of Radioembolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011;
  • 28 Paprottka PM, Schmidt GP, Trumm CG. Changes in normal liver and spleen volume after radioembolization with (90)y-resin microspheres in metastatic breast cancer patients: findings and clinical significance. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2011; 34: 964-972
  • 29 Rhee TK, Lewandowski RJ, Liu DM et al. 90Y Radioembolization for metastatic neuroendocrine liver tumors: preliminary results from a multi-institutional experience. Ann Surg 2009; 247: 1029-1035
  • 30 Ruszniewski P, Malka D. Hepatic arterial chemoembolization in the management of advanced digestive endocrine tumors. Digestion 2000; 62 (Suppl. 01) 79-83
  • 31 Safford SD, Coleman RE, Gockerman JP et al. Iodine-131 metaiodobenzylguanidine treatment for metastatic carcinoid. Results in 98 patients. Cancer 2004; 101: 1987-1993
  • 32 Salem R, Thurston KG. Radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres: a state-of-the-art brachytherapy treatment for primary and secondary liver malignancies: part 3: comprehensive literature review and future direction. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006; 17: 1571-1593
  • 33 Sangro B, Carpanese L, Cianni R et al. Survival after Yttrium-90 resin microsphere radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma across barcelona clinic liver cancer stages: A European evaluation. Hepatology 2011;
  • 34 Saxena A, Chua TC, Bester L et al. Factors predicting response and survival after yttrium-90 radioembolization of unresectable neuroendocrine tumor liver metastases: a critical appraisal of 48 cases. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 910-916
  • 35 Strosberg J, Nasir A, Coppola D et al. Correlation between grade and prognosis in metastatic gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Hum Pathol 2009; 40: 1262-1268
  • 36 Strosberg JR, Cheema A, Kvols LK. A review of systemic and liver-directed therapies for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic tract. Cancer Control 2011; 18: 127-137
  • 37 Therasse E, Breittmayer F, Roche A et al. Transcatheter chemoembolization of progressive carcinoid liver metastasis. Radiology1993. 189: 541-547
  • 38 Vente MA, Wondergem M, van der Tweel I et al. Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for the treatment of liver malignancies: a structured meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 951-959