Perceptions of a Strategy to Prevent and Relieve Care Provider Distress in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Felix A. Okah; Dawn M. Wolff; Virginia D. Boos; Barbara M. Haney; Adebayo A. Oshodi

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1314889

American Journal of Perinatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Am J Perinatol 2012; 29(09): 687-692
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1314889

Original Article

Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Perceptions of a Strategy to Prevent and Relieve Care Provider Distress in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Felix A. Okah

¹Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri

,

Dawn M. Wolff

²Department of Strategic Planning, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri

,

Virginia D. Boos

³Department of Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri

,

Barbara M. Haney

⁴Department of Nursing, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri

,

Adebayo A. Oshodi

¹Department of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Hospitals and Clinics, Kansas City, Missouri

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Background A Midwestern neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) employs a multidisciplinary conference, the Comprehensive Care Round (CCR), to facilitate communication and consensus building and thereby prevent or address moral distress within the health care team.

Methods A cross-sectional survey, 3 years after implementation of CCR, to evaluate health care providers' (HCP) perceptions of comfort with expressing distress, support from team members in care situations that evoke moral distress, barriers to communication, and attainment of CCR objectives.

Results Of 370 HCP, 116 (31%) participated in the survey (42% nurses, 37% allied health, and 21% medical); 51% had previously attended CCR. CCR attendance was higher among HCP aged >35 years, those who cared for CCR patients, and nonnurses. Neonatologist were more likely than others (44% versus 4%, p <0.01) to report that referred cases were not overdue for discussion and that families appreciated the attention their child received from CCR. Of note, HCP who were comfortable with expressing distress also felt supported by team members (R = 0.5, p <0.001).

Conclusion CCR, developed to prevent or address moral distress, occurs later than most NICU HCP consider appropriate and appears to better serve HCP who are already comfortable with discussing moral distress. Helping HCP become comfortable with crucial conversations should support meaningful participation and contribution to multidisciplinary conferences.

Keywords

moral distress - NICU - communication - multidisciplinary

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Armstrong DM. Perception and the Physical World. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1961: 105
2 Maltezou HC, Dedoukou X, Patrinos S , et al. Determinants of intention to get vaccinated against novel (pandemic) influenza A H1N1 among health-care workers in a nationwide survey. J Infect 2010; 61: 252-258
3 O'Brien DT, Wilson DS. Community perception: the ability to assess the safety of unfamiliar neighborhoods and respond adaptively. J Pers Soc Psychol 2011; 100: 606-620
4 McAndrew NS, Leske JS, Garcia A. Influence of moral distress on the professional practice environment during prognostic conflict in critical care. J Trauma Nurs 2011; 18: 221-230
5 Jameton A. Dilemmas of moral distress: moral responsibility and nursing practice. AWHONNS Clin Issues Perinat Womens Health Nurs 1993; 4: 542-551
6 O'Leary KJ, Ritter CD, Wheeler H, Szekendi MK, Brinton TS, Williams MV. Teamwork on inpatient medical units: assessing attitudes and barriers. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19: 117-121
7 Ferrell BR. Understanding the moral distress of nurses witnessing medically futile care. Oncol Nurs Forum 2006; 33: 922-930
8 Boos VD, Okah FA, Swinton CH, Wolff DM, Haney B. The comprehensive care rounds: facilitating multidisciplinary communication among caregivers of complex patients in the neonatal intensive care unit. Adv Neonatal Care 2010; 10: 301-306
9 Blatt R, Christianson M, Sutcliffe KM, Rosenthal MM. A sensemaking lens on reliability. J Organ Behav 2006; 27: 897-917
10 Ulrich CM, Hamric AB, Grady C. Moral distress: a growing problem in the health professions?. Hastings Cent Rep 2010; 40: 20-22
11 Aslakson RA, Wyskiel R, Shaeffer D , et al. Surgical intensive care unit clinician estimates of the adequacy of communication regarding patient prognosis. Crit Care 2010; 14: R218
12 Manojlovich M. Nurse/physician communication through a sensemaking lens: shifting the paradigm to improve patient safety. Med Care 2010; 48: 941-946
13 Mwachofi A, Walston SL, Al-Omar BA. Factors affecting nurses' perceptions of patient safety. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 2011; 24: 274-283
14 Elpern EH, Covert B, Kleinpell R. Moral distress of staff nurses in a medical intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care 2005; 14: 523-530
15 Zimmerman T, Amori G. The silent organizational pathology of insidious intimidation. J Healthc Risk Manag 2011; 30: 5-6 , 8–15
16 El-Jardali F, Dimassi H, Jamal D, Jaafar M, Hemadeh N. Predictors and outcomes of patient safety culture in hospitals. BMC Health Serv Res 2011; 11: 45
17 Teng CI, Dai YT, Shyu YI, Wong MK, Chu TL, Tsai YH. Professional commitment, patient safety, and patient-perceived care quality. J Nurs Scholarsh 2009; 41: 301-309
18 Bullock S. Empowering staff with communication. Addressing conflict and silence contributes to a safer culture. Healthc Exec 2011; 26: 80 , 82