Zentralbl Chir 2012; 137(4): 364-370
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1315124
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die STARR-Operation zur Therapie des obstruktiven Defäkationssyndroms

Stapled Transanal Resection for the Treatment of Obstructed Defaecation Syndrome
C. Isbert
Chirurgische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
,
M. Kim
Chirurgische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
,
J. Reibetanz
Chirurgische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
,
C. T. Germer
Chirurgische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 August 2012 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Die transanale Staplerresektion des Rektums (STARR) ist ein gut evaluiertes Operationsverfahren zur Behandlung einer morphologischen Outletobstruktion im Rahmen eines konservativ refraktären obstruktiven Defäkationssyndroms (ODS). Entsprechend muss zunächst die Diagnose eines ODS gestellt und objektiviert werden, welches sich idealerweise durch Erhebung von speziellen Bewertungsbögen (Scores) realisieren lässt. Neben der allgemeinen koloproktologischen Abklärung ist die Defäkografie wichtigstes bildgebendes Verfahren der präoperativen Diagnostik. Differenzialdiagnostisch gilt es insbesondere die Beckenboden-Dyssynergie und die Slow-Transit-Konstipation auszuschließen. Die operative Therapie erfolgt von transanal als Vollwandresektion entweder konventionell durch 2 einzelne Resektate der vorderen und hinteren Zirkumferenz des Rektums (PPH01) oder als tubuläre Monoblockresektion mit dem Contour Transtar®. Die Morbidität des Verfahrens ist durch Analyse von n = 2838 konsekutiven Patienten des europäischen STARR-Registers mit einer Gesamtrate von 36 % ausgewiesen, wobei der unwillkürliche Stuhldrang mit 20 % und die Nachblutung mit 5 % den größten Anteil davon ausmachen. In spezialisierten Zentren sind bei strenger Selektion der Patienten wesentlich bessere Ergebnisse erzielt worden. Die funktionellen Resultate in Bezug auf eine Verbesserung der Konstipation nach 1 Jahr und im Langzeitverlauf von aktuell bis zu 68 Monaten zeigen ein Ansprechen von bis zu 90 % bei einer Rezidivrate von 5–18 %. Zusammenfassend stellt die STARR-Operation ein gut evaluiertes operatives Verfahren zur Behandlung einer konservativ refraktären Outletobstruktion dar mit einer hohen primären Ansprechrate, einer akzeptablen Morbidität und ersten Analysen nach offenbar mit einer guten Langzeiteffektivität.

Abstract

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) has become a well-evaluated surgical procedure for the treatment of outlet obstruction in the context of conservative refractory obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS). The diagnosis of ODS needs to be objectified which can be best ensured by clinical scoring systems. Besides a general coloproctological examination, dynamic defecography represents the most important diagnostic procedure. Pelvic floor dyssynergia and slow transit constipation should always be taken into account for the differential diagnosis and for which the STARR procedure is generally contraindicated. Surgery is performed via a transanal approach using a full thickness rectal resection of either the ventral or dorsal proportion of the rectal wall in the PPH01 conventional procedure or circumferentially by monoblock resection in the contour transtar® procedure. Morbidity is best characterised by data of the European STARR registry which contains a total number of n = 2,838 consecutive patients. The overall morbidity rate was 36 % whereby urgency (20 %) and bleeding (5 %) were the most frequent complications. More favourable data have been published in single centre studies. Functional results are available with a follow-up of 1 year up to 68 months postoperatively. Response rates of up to 90 % were reported whereas recurrence rates were given with a maximum of 18 % at 68 months follow-up. In summary, the STARR procedure provides good functional results in conservative refractory outlet obstruction with minor morbidity and the outcome seems to remain stable in the long-term follow-up.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Bove A, Pucciani F, Bellini M et al. Consensus statement AIGO/SICCR: Diagnosis and treatment of chronic constipation and obstructed defecation (part I: Diagnosis). World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 1555-1564
  • 2 Sun WM. Obstructed defecation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1993; 8: 383-389
  • 3 Schwandner O, Stuto A, Jayne D et al. Decision-making algorithm for the STARR procedure in obstructed defecation syndrome: position statement of the group of STARR Pioneers. Surg Innov 2008; 15: 105-109
  • 4 Biviano I, Badiali D, Candeloro L et al. Comparative outcome of stapled trans-anal rectal resection and macrogol in the treatment of defecation disorders. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17: 4199-4205
  • 5 Camilleri M, Kerstens R, Rykx A et al. A placebo-controlled trial of prucalopride for severe chronic constipation. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2344-2354
  • 6 Christensen P, Krogh K. Transanal irrigation for disordered defecation: a systematic review. Scand J Gastroenterol 2010; 45: 517-527
  • 7 Lehur PA, Stuto A, Fantoli M et al. Outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with rectal intussusception and rectocele: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 1611-1618
  • 8 Faaborg PM, Christensen P, Kvitsau B et al. Long-term outcome and safety of transanal colonic irrigation for neurogenic bowel dysfunction. Spinal Cord 2009; 47: 545-549
  • 9 Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW et al. Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 504-512
  • 10 Laubert T, Bader FG, Kleemann M et al. Outcome analysis of elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27: 789-795
  • 11 Reibetanz J, Boenicke L, Kim M et al. Enterocele is not a contraindication to stapled transanal surgery for outlet obstruction: an analysis of 170 patients. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: e131-136
  • 12 Boenicke L, Kim M, Reibetanz J et al. Stapled transanal rectal resection and sacral nerve stimulation – impact on faecal incontinence and quality of life. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 480-489
  • 13 Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J et al. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 681-685
  • 14 Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Calabro G et al. Stapled transanal rectal resection in solitary rectal ulcer associated with prolapse of the rectum: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 348-354
  • 15 Altomare DF, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M et al. Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10: 84-88
  • 16 Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77-97
  • 17 Bordeianou L, Savitt L, Dursun A. Measurements of pelvic floor dyssynergia: which test result matters?. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 60-65
  • 18 Boenicke L, Jayne DG, Kim M et al. What happens in stapled transanal rectum resection?. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 593-600
  • 19 Dindo D, Weishaupt D, Lehmann K et al. Clinical and morphologic correlation after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 1768-1774
  • 20 Jayne DG, Schwandner O, Stuto A. Stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: one-year results of the European STARR Registry. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1205-1212
  • 21 Pescatori M, Zbar AP. Reinterventions after complicated or failed STARR procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 87-95
  • 22 Boenicke L, Reibetanz J, Kim M et al. Predictive factors for postoperative constipation and continence after stapled transanal rectal resection. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 416-422
  • 23 Köhler K, Stelzner S, Hellmich G et al. Results in the long-term course after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR). Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012; 397: 771-778
  • 24 Isbert C, Reibetanz J, Jayne DG et al. Comparative study of Contour Transtar and STARR procedure for the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) – feasibility, morbidity and early functional results. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 901-908
  • 25 Gelos M, Frommhold K, Mann B. Severe mesorectal bleeding after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR-operation) using the ‘Contour Transtar curved cutter stapler . Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 265-266
  • 26 Isbert C, Jayne D, Germer CT et al. Severe mesorectal bleeding after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR-operation) using the ‘Contour Transtar Curved Cutter Stapler . Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 494-494
  • 27 Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G et al. Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol 2003; 7: 148-153
  • 28 Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A et al. Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1285-1296
  • 29 Meurette G, Wong M, Frampas E et al. Anatomical and functional results after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defaecation syndrome. Colorectal Dis 2010;
  • 30 Goede AC, Glancy D, Carter H et al. Medium-term results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructed defecation and symptomatic rectal-anal intussusception. Colorectal Dis 2011; 13: 1052-1057
  • 31 Ommer A, Rolfs TM, Walz MK. Long-term results of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) for obstructive defecation syndrome. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010; 25: 1287-1292
  • 32 Zehler O, Vashist YK, Bogoevski D et al. Quo vadis STARR? A prospective long-term follow-up of stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome. J Gastrointest Surg 2010; 14: 1349-1354
  • 33 Madbouly KM, Abbas KS, Hussein AM. Disappointing long-term outcomes after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation. World J Surg 2010; 34: 2191-2196
  • 34 Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Roviaro G. What is the benefit of a new stapler device in the surgical treatment of obstructed defecation? Three-year outcomes from a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 77-84
  • 35 Wadhawan H, Shorthouse AJ, Brown SR. Surgery for obstructed defaecation: does the use of the Contour device (Trans-STARR) improve results?. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 885-890
  • 36 Renzi A, Brillantino A, Di Sarno G et al. Improved clinical outcomes with a new contour-curved stapler in the surgical treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome: A mid-term randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2011; 54: 736-742
  • 37 Savastano S, Valenti G, Cavallin F et al. STARR with PPH-01 and CCS30 contour transtar for obstructed defecation syndrome. Surg Innov 2012; 19: 171-174