Download PDF
Zentralbl Chir 2012; 137(4): 357-363
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1315125
Übersicht
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die laparoskopische Resektionsrektopexie zur Therapie des obstruktiven Defäkationssyndroms

Laparoscopic Resection Rectopexy as Treatment for Obstructive Defecation Syndrome
T. Laubert
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
,
M. Kleemann
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
,
U. J. Roblick
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
,
C. Bürk
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
,
A. Schorcht
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
,
P. Hildebrand
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
,
H.-P. Bruch
Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
29 August 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Die Outlet Obstruction ist eine Unterform der chronischen Obstipation. Fast immer sind Kombinationen von morphologischen Veränderungen des Beckens, des Beckenbodens und des Kolorektums nachzuweisen. Im Rahmen der Diagnostik gilt es, diejenigen Patienten zu identifizieren, die von einer operativen Therapie profitieren. Die Resektionsrektopexie versucht, die physiologische Anatomie und damit das funktionelle Zusammenspiel der beteiligten Strukturen wiederherzustellen, wobei die laparoskopische Technik die Vorteile der minimalinvasiven Chirurgie mit sich bringt. Neben der Erläuterung des eigenen operativen Vorgehens und des Algorithmus zur Indikationsstellung werden die Ergebnisse nach 19 Jahren eigener Erfahrung dargestellt. Innerhalb dieses Zeitraums wurden 264 Resektionsrektopexien in laparoskopischer Technik aufgrund einer Outlet Obstruction durchgeführt. Bei einer mittleren Dauer der Nachbeobachtung von 58,2 Monaten betrug die Rate der Besserung der Obstruktionsbeschwerden 79,5 % (n = 128 von n = 161 Nachbeobachtungen). Die vorliegenden Studien deuten darauf hin, dass die (laparoskopische) Resektionsrektopexie gegenüber nicht resezierenden Verfahren und Verfahren mit Implantation allogenen Materials zu besseren Ergebnissen führt. Voraussetzung ist hierbei eine korrekte Selektionierung der Patienten und die laparoskopische Expertise. Sowohl die perioperativen als auch die funktionellen Ergebnisse des eigenen Kollektivs untermauern die Vorteile der laparoskopischen Resektionsrektopexie bei Patienten mit einer Outlet Obstruction.

Abstract

Anorectal outlet obstruction constitutes one form of chronic constipation. Combinations of morphological alterations of the pelvis, the pelvic floor and the colorectum are nearly always evident. The goal of the diagnostic work-up is to identify those patients who will profit from a surgical intervention. Resection rectopexy aims at restoring the physiological anatomy thereby ameliorating the functional interaction of structures effected with the laparoscopic approach entailing all advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Besides a detailed description of the surgical technique used and an algorithm for indications to operate we present our results after 19 years of experience. Throughout this period, 264 laparoscopic resection rectopexies for outlet obstruction were performed. With a mean follow-up of 58.2 months the rate of improvement of obstructive symptoms was 79.5 % (n = 128 of 161 available for follow-up). Present studies suggest that (laparoscopic) resection rectopexy entails better results in comparison to non-resecting procedures and procedures with the implantation of allogenic material. Certainly, in order to achieve these results a correct patient selection and an expertise in laparoscopic surgery are essential. Both the perioperative and the functional results of our own collective fortify the advantages of laparoscopic resection rectopexy in patients with an outlet obstruction.

Schlüsselwörter

Resektionsrektopexie - obstruktives Defäkationssyndrom - Sigmoidozele - Laparoskopie

Key words

resection rectopexy - obstructive defaecation syndrome - sigmoidocele - laparoscopy
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Chiarelli P, Brown W, McElduff P. Constipation in Australian women: prevalence and associated factors. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2000; 11: 71-78
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Sonnenberg A, Koch TR. Epidemiology of constipation in the United States. Dis Colon Rectum 1989; 32: 1-8
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Suares NC, Ford AC. Prevalence of, and risk factors for, chronic idiopathic constipation in the community: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol 2011; 106: 1582-1591 (quiz 1581–1592)
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Lehur PA, Stuto A, Fantoli M et al. Outcomes of stapled transanal rectal resection vs. biofeedback for the treatment of outlet obstruction associated with rectal intussusception and rectocele: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 1611-1618
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Longstreth GF, Thompson WG, Chey WD et al. Functional bowel disorders. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: 1480-1491
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Laubert T, Bader FG, Kleemann M et al. Outcome analysis of elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27: 789-795
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Andromanakos N, Skandalakis P, Troupis T et al. Constipation of anorectal outlet obstruction: pathophysiology, evaluation and management. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 21: 638-646
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Herold A. Diagnostik und chirurgische Therapie der chronischen Obstipation. Viszeralchirurgie 2001; 36: 196-202
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Herold A. Systematik der chronischen Obstipation. Coloproctology 2001; 23: 317-321
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 DʼHoore A, Penninckx F. Obstructed defecation. Colorectal Dis 2003; 5: 280-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Colaiacomo MC, Masselli G, Polettini E et al. Dynamic MR imaging of the pelvic floor: a pictorial review. Radiographics 2009; 29: e35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Laubert T, Kleemann M, Schorcht A et al. Laparoscopic resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a single-center study during 16 years. Surg Endosc 2010; 24: 2401-2406
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Frykman HM, Goldberg SM. The surgical treatment of rectal procidentia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1969; 129: 1225-1230
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Heymen S, Jones KR, Scarlett Y et al. Biofeedback treatment of constipation: a critical review. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46: 1208-1217
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Bruch H-P, Fischer F, Schiedeck THK et al. Defäkationsobstruktion. Chirurg 2004; 75: 861-870
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Matzel KE, Heuer S, Zhang W. [Rectal prolapse. Abdominal or local approach]. Chirurg 2008; 79: 444-451
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ommer A, Rolfs T, Walz MK. Chirurgische Therapieoptionen bei Stuhlentleerungsstörungen. CHAZ 2010; 11: 393-404
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Jorge JM, Yang YK, Wexner SD. Incidence and clinical significance of sigmoidoceles as determined by a new classification system. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37: 1112-1117
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Martin Martin G, Garcia Armengol J, Roig Vila JV et al. Analysis of experience in the use of dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of obstructive defaecation syndrome. Cir Esp 2012; 90: 292-297
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Schwandner O, Farke S, Fischer F et al. Chirurgische Therapie der Outlet-Obstruktion bei Sigmoidozelen – Ist die laparoskopische Operation sicher und komplikationsarm?. Coloproctology 2004; 26: 75-84
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Thompson JR, Chen AH, Pettit PD et al. Incidence of occult rectal prolapse in patients with clinical rectoceles and defecatory dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002; 187: 1494-1499 (discussion 1499–1500)
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dodi G, Pietroletti R, Milito G et al. Bleeding, incontinence, pain and constipation after STARR transanal double stapling rectotomy for obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol 2003; 7: 148-153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A et al. Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1285-1296
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Boenicke L, Reibetanz J, Kim M et al. Predictive factors for postoperative constipation and continence after stapled transanal rectal resection. Br J Surg 2012; 99: 416-422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Madbouly KM, Abbas KS, Hussein AM. Disappointing long-term outcomes after stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation. World J Surg 2010; 34: 2191-2196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Zbar AP, Lienemann A, Fritsch H et al. Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management. Int J Colorectal Dis 2003; 18: 369-384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Chen HH, Iroatulam A, Alabaz O et al. Associations of defecography and physiologic findings in male patients with rectocele. Tech Coloproctol 2001; 5: 157-161
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Tou S, Brown SR, Malik AI et al. Surgery for complete rectal prolapse in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; CD001758
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Madiba TE, Baig MK, Wexner SD. Surgical management of rectal prolapse. Arch Surg 2005; 140: 63-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Kim M, Reibetanz J, Boenicke L et al. Quality of life after laparoscopic resection rectopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012; 27: 489-495
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Benoist S, Taffinder N, Gould S et al. Functional results two years after laparoscopic rectopexy. Am J Surg 2001; 182: 168-173
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Stevenson AR, Stitz RW, Lumley JW. Laparoscopic-assisted resection-rectopexy for rectal prolapse: early and medium follow-up. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 46-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Ashari LH, Lumley JW, Stevenson AR et al. Laparoscopically-assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: ten yearsʼ experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 982-987
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW et al. Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 504-512
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Portier G, Iovino F, Lazorthes F. Surgery for rectal prolapse: Orr-Loygue ventral rectopexy with limited dissection prevents postoperative-induced constipation without increasing recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum 2006; 49: 1136-1140
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Marchal F, Bresler L, Ayav A et al. Long-term results of Delormeʼs procedure and Orr-Loygue rectopexy to treat complete rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 1785-1790
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Bruch HP, Herold A, Schiedeck T et al. Laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse and outlet obstruction. Dis Colon Rectum 1999; 42: 1189-1194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Tsiaoussis J, Chrysos E, Athanasakis E et al. Rectoanal intussusception: presentation of the disorder and late results of resection rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2005; 48: 838-844
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Gemsenjager E. [Internal rectal prolapse: therapy outcome and current status]. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1996; 126: 1377-1384
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Kellokumpu IH, Vironen J, Scheinin T. Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: a prospective study evaluating surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel function. Surg Endosc 2000; 14: 634-640
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Orrom WJ, Bartolo DC, Miller R et al. Rectopexy is an ineffective treatment for obstructed defecation. Dis Colon Rectum 1991; 34: 41-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 DʼHoore A, Vanbeckevoort D, Penninckx F. Clinical, physiological and radiological assessment of rectovaginal septum reinforcement with mesh for complex rectocele. Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1264-1272
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Oom DM, Gosselink MP, van Wijk JJ et al. Rectocele repair by anterolateral rectopexy: long-term functional outcome. Colorectal Dis 2008; 10: 925-930
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Schultz I, Mellgren A, Dolk A et al. Long-term results and functional outcome after Ripstein rectopexy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 35-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Boons P, Collinson R, Cunningham C et al. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse improves constipation and avoids de novo constipation. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12: 526-532
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Kariv Y, Delaney CP, Casillas S et al. Long-term outcome after laparoscopic and open surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-control study. Surg Endosc 2006; 20: 35-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Heah SM, Hartley JE, Hurley J et al. Laparoscopic suture rectopexy without resection is effective treatment for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 638-643
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Johnson E, Stangeland A, Johannessen HO et al. Resection rectopexy for external rectal prolapse reduces constipation and anal incontinence. Scand J Surg 2007; 96: 56-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 von Papen M, Ashari LH, Lumley JW et al. Functional results of laparoscopic resection rectopexy for symptomatic rectal intussusception. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 50-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar