Electrophysiological Measures of Auditory Processing in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) experience more hearing loss than age-matched control subjects. Patients with MS also exhibit deficits processing auditory stimuli, including speech in a background of noise. These findings suggest that auditory deficits in the MS population can result from damage to central neural pathways in addition to peripheral hearing structures. To assess auditory processing functions in patients with MS, this study used auditory event-related potentials (AERPs)—specifically, the auditory brain stem response (ABR) and long-latency AERPs including the P300. AERPs recorded from 20 patients with MS were compared to AERPs from 20 healthy control subjects. When ABR stimuli (clicks) were presented monaurally, there were no significant differences between groups in component latencies or amplitudes for waves I through V. However, binaural presentation of the same stimuli elicited wave V ABR components significantly greater in amplitude for the control group compared with the MS group. Long-latency AERP results showed no significant differences between groups for N100 latency and amplitude or for P300 latency. P300 component amplitude was significantly greater for control subjects compared with patients with MS. It is probable that neural degeneration and impaired neural transmission within the MS group contributed to these AERP results. AERPs are useful tools that can be used to assess peripheral and central auditory functions as well as cognitive processing abilities in patients with MS. AERPs could be used to evaluate neural integrity, disease progression, and treatment efficacy in this population.

Keywords

multiple sclerosis - MS - auditory event-related potentials - evoked potentials - AERP

• References

• 1 Dayal VS, Swisher LP. Pure tone thresholds in multiple sclerosis. A further study. Laryngoscope 1967; 77: 2169-2177
• 2 Cohen M, Rudge P. The effect of multiple sclerosis on pure tone thresholds. Acta Otolaryngol 1984; 97: 291-295
• 3 Lewis MS, Lilly DJ, Hutter MM , et al. Audiometric hearing status of individuals with and without multiple sclerosis. J Rehabil Res Dev 2010; 47: 669-678
• 4 Rappaport JM, Gulliver JM, Phillips DP, Van Dorpe RA, Maxner CE, Bhan V. Auditory temporal resolution in multiple sclerosis. J Otolaryngol 1994; 23: 307-324
• 5 Lewis MS, Lilly DJ, Hutter MM, Bourdette DN, Saunders J, Fausti SA. Some effects of multiple sclerosis on speech perception in noise: preliminary findings. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006; 43: 91-98
• 6 Musiek FE, Gollegly KM, Kibbe KS, Reeves AG. Electrophysiologic and behavioral auditory findings in multiple sclerosis. Am J Otol 1989; 10: 343-350
• 7 Hendler T, Squires NK, Emmerich DS. Psychophysical measures of central auditory dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: neurophysiological and neuroanatomical correlates. Ear Hear 1990; 11: 403-416
• 8 Gadea M, Marti-Bonmatí L, Arana E, Espert R, Salvador A, Casanova B. Corpus callosum function in verbal dichotic listening: inferences from a longitudinal follow-up of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Brain Lang 2009; 110: 101-105
• 9 ASHA. Guidelines for manual pure-tone threshold audiometry. ASHA 1978; 20: 297-301
• 10 Reilly EL. EEG recording and operation of the apparatus. In: Niedermeyer E, Lopes da Silva F, eds. Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications, and Related Fields. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004: 139-159
• 11 Chiappa KH, Harrison JL, Brooks EB, Young RR. Brainstem auditory evoked responses in 200 patients with multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1980; 7: 135-143
• 12 Djupesland G, Tvete O, Stein R, Bachen NI. A comparison between auditory and visual evoked responses in multiple sclerosis. Scand Audiol Suppl 1981; 13: 135-137
• 13 Kjaer M. Evoked potentials. With special reference to the diagnostic value in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1983; 67: 67-89
• 14 Hutchinson M, Blandford S, Glynn D, Martin EA. Clinical correlates of abnormal brain-stem auditory evoked responses in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1984; 70: 90-95
• 15 Paludetti G, Ottaviani F, Gallai V, Tassoni A, Maurizi M. Auditory brainstem responses (ABR) in multiple sclerosis. Scand Audiol 1985; 14: 27-34
• 16 Lima TM, Crato AN, Mancini PC, Simões LC, Gonçalves DU. Alterations in early auditory evoked potentials in multiple sclerosis patients. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 75: 177-181
• 17 McPherson DL, Tures C, Starr A. Binaural interaction of the auditory brain-stem potentials and middle latency auditory evoked potentials in infants and adults. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 74: 124-130
• 18 Wrege KS, Starr A. Binaural interaction in human auditory brainstem evoked potentials. Arch Neurol 1981; 38: 572-580
• 19 Levine RA. Binaural interaction in brainstem potentials of human subjects. Ann Neurol 1981; 9: 384-393
• 20 Polich J, Romine JS, Sipe JC, Aung M, Dalessio DJ. P300 in multiple sclerosis: a preliminary report. Int J Psychophysiol 1992; 12: 155-163
• 21 Aminoff JC, Goodin DS. Long-latency cerebral event-related potentials in multiple sclerosis. J Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 18: 372-377
• 22 Piras MR, Magnano I, Canu ED , et al. Longitudinal study of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: neuropsychological, neuroradiological, and neurophysiological findings. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 878-885
• 23 Magnano I, Aiello I, Piras MR. Cognitive impairment and neurophysiological correlates in MS. J Neurol Sci 2006; 245: 117-122
• 24 Gonzalez-Rosa JJ, Vazquez-Marrufo M, Vaquero E , et al. Differential cognitive impairment for diverse forms of multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurosci 2006; 7: 39
• 25 Whelan R, Lonergan R, Kiiski H , et al. A high-density ERP study reveals latency, amplitude, and topographical differences in multiple sclerosis patients versus controls. Clin Neurophysiol 2010; 121: 1420-1426
• 26 Benedict RH, Carone DA, Bakshi R. Correlating brain atrophy with cognitive dysfunction, mood disturbances, and personality disorder in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging 2004; 14 (3) (Suppl) 36S-45S
• 27 Lanz M, Hahn HK, Hildebrandt H. Brain atrophy and cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis: a review. J Neurol 2007; 254 (Suppl. 02) II43-II48
• 28 Houtchens MK, Benedict RH, Killiany R , et al. Thalamic atrophy and cognition in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 2007; 69: 1213-1223
• 29 Tekok-Kilic A, Benedict RH, Weinstock-Guttman B , et al. Independent contributions of cortical gray matter atrophy and ventricle enlargement for predicting neuropsychological impairment in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2007; 36: 1294-1300
• 30 Fisher E, Lee JC, Nakamura K, Rudick RA. Gray matter atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal study. Ann Neurol 2008; 64: 255-265