Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2012; 28(09): 581-588
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1315784
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Skeletal Muscle Injury and Repair: The Effect of Disuse and Denervation on Muscle and Clinical Relevance in Pedicled and Free Muscle Flaps

Minna Kääriäinen
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
,
Susanna Kauhanen
2   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

22 January 2012

22 February 2012

Publication Date:
18 June 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Skeletal muscle is prone to injury upon trauma or nerve damage. In reconstructive surgery, it is an interesting spare part. Fortunately, skeletal muscle is capable of extensive regeneration. Satellite cells, quiescent myogenic precursor cells, become activated following muscle injury: they divide and form myoblasts, fuse into myotubes, and finally mature to myofibers. Denervation in muscle or muscle flaps leads to myofiber atrophy, fibrosis, and fatty tissue infiltration. Experiments show that muscle flaps that are reinnervated also display a fair amount of atrophy. Muscle mass is better preserved after motor innervation than sensory innervation. Clinical data imply that innervation of the muscle flap does not improve volume preservation significantly compared with denervated flaps. In addition, the softness of the flap remains the same whether the flap is innervated or not. Innervation of the flap seems to be needed only if functional muscle reconstruction is the goal. If reinnervation is successful but the muscle is kept short, disuse atrophy will still proceed. Muscle flaps should therefore be placed into their original length.

Keywords

muscle injury - denervation - disuse - atrophy - flap
 

  • References

  • 1 Wolff K-D, Stiller D. Functional aspects of free muscle transplantation: atrophy, reinnervation, and metabolism. J Reconstr Microsurg 1992; 8: 137-142
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kostakoglu N, Terenghi G, Manek S, Batchelor AG, Polak JM, Green CJ. Reinnervation and neovascularisation in prefabricated free muscle flaps. Microsurgery 1995; 16: 388-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Zhang F, Lineaweaver WC, Ustüner T , et al. Comparison of muscle mass preservation in denervated muscle and transplanted muscle flaps after motor and sensory reinnervation and neurotization. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 803-814
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Oswald TM, Zhang F, Lei M-P, Gerzenshtein J, Lineaweaver WC. Muscle flap mass preservation with end-to-side neurorrhaphy: an experimental study. J Reconstr Microsurg 2004; 20: 483-488
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Yoshitatsu S, Matsuda K, Yano K, Hosokawa K, Tomita K. Muscle flap mass preservation by sensory reinnervation with end-to-side neurorrhaphy: an experimental study in rats. J Reconstr Microsurg 2008; 24: 479-487
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kauhanen MS, Salmi AM, von Boguslawsky EK, Leivo IV, Asko-Seljavaara SL. Muscle fiber diameter and muscle type distribution following free microvascular muscle transfers: a prospective study. Microsurgery 1998; 18: 137-144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Kauhanen S, Salmi A, von Boguslawski K, Asko-Seljavaara S, Leivo I. Satellite cell proliferation, reinnervation, and revascularization in human free microvascular muscle flaps. J Surg Res 2003; 115: 191-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kauhanen MS, Lorenzetti F, Leivo IV, Tukiainen E, Asko-Seljavaara SL. Long-term morphometric and immunohistochemical findings in human free microvascular muscle flaps. Microsurgery 2004; 24: 30-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kauhanen SC, Ylä-Kotola TM, Leivo IV, Tukiainen E, Asko-Seljavaara SL. Long-term adaptation of human microneurovascular muscle flaps to the paralyzed face: an immunohistochemical study. Microsurgery 2006; 26: 557-565
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kääriäinen M, Giordano S, Kauhanen S , et al. The significance of latissimus dorsi flap innervation in delayed breast reconstruction: a prospective randomized study-magnetic resonance imaging and histologic findings. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128: 637e-645e
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Oldfors A, Mair WG, Fogdestam I. The morphological sequences in man of de- and reinnervation in free muscle transfer with microneurovascular anastomoses. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1989; 23: 35-42
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Wu X, Wang S, Chen B, An X. Muscle-derived stem cells: isolation, characterization, differentiation, and application in cell and gene therapy. Cell Tissue Res 2010; 340: 549-567
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Kalimo H, Rantanen J, Järvinen M. Muscle injuries in sports. Bailliere's. In: Bailliere's clinical orthopaedics - international practice and research. Soft tissue injuries in sports. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1997: 1-24
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Schultz E. Satellite cell behavior during skeletal muscle growth and regeneration. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1989; 21: S181-S186
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Grounds MD. Towards understanding skeletal muscle regeneration. Pathol Res Pract 1991; 187: 1-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Hurme T, Kalimo H, Lehto M, Järvinen M. Healing of skeletal muscle injury: an ultrastructural and immunohistochemical study. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 801-810
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Allbrook D. Skeletal muscle regeneration. Muscle Nerve 1981; 4: 234-245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Bodine-Fowler S. Skeletal muscle regeneration after injury: an overview. J Voice 1994; 8: 53-62
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Carpenter S, Karpati G. Segmental necrosis and its demarcation in experimental micropuncture injury of skeletal muscle fibers. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1989; 48: 154-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Papadimitriou JM, Robertson TA, Mitchell CA, Grounds MD. The process of new plasmalemma formation in focally injured skeletal muscle fibers. J Struct Biol 1990; 103: 124-134
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Tidball JG. Inflammatory cell response to acute muscle injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1995; 27: 1022-1032
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kääriäinen M, Kääriäinen J, Järvinen TLN , et al. Integrin and dystrophin associated adhesion protein complexes during regeneration of shearing-type muscle injury. Neuromuscul Disord 2000; 10: 121-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Kääriäinen M, Liljamo T, Pelto-Huikko M, Heino J, Järvinen M, Kalimo H. Regulation of α7 integrin by mechanical stress during skeletal muscle regeneration. Neuromuscul Disord 2001; 11: 360-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kääriäinen M, Nissinen L, Kaufman S , et al. Expression of α7β1 integrin splicing variants during skeletal muscle regeneration. Am J Pathol 2002; 161: 1023-1031
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Vaittinen S, Hurme T, Rantanen J, Kalimo H. Transected myofibres may remain permanently divided in two parts. Neuromuscul Disord 2002; 12: 584-587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Rantanen J, Ranne J, Hurme T, Kalimo H. Denervated segments of injured skeletal muscle fibers are reinnervated by newly formed neuromuscular junctions. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 1995; 54: 188-194
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Aärimaa V, Kääriäinen M, Vaittinen S , et al. Restoration of myofiber continuity after transection injury in the rat soleus. Neuromuscul Disord 2004; 14: 421-428
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Burden SJ, Sargent PB, McMahan UJ. Acetylcholine receptors in regenerating muscle accumulate at original synaptic sites in the absence of the nerve. J Cell Biol 1979; 82: 412-425
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Küllmer K, Sievers KW, Reimers CD , et al. Changes of sonographic, magnetic resonance tomographic, electromyographic, and histopathologic findings within a 2-month period of examinations after experimental muscle denervation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998; 117: 228-234
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Fritz RC, Wischer TK, Stork A, Genant HK. Denervation syndromes of the shoulder girdle: MR imaging with electrophysiologic correlation. Skeletal Radiol 1999; 28: 567-572
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Wessig C, Koltzenburg M, Reiners K, Solymosi L, Bendszus M. Muscle magnetic resonance imaging of denervation and reinnervation: correlation with electrophysiology and histology. Exp Neurol 2004; 185: 254-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Furuno K, Goodman MN, Goldberg AL. Role of different proteolytic systems in the degradation of muscle proteins during denervation atrophy. J Biol Chem 1990; 265: 8550-8557
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Sarnat HB, Portnoy JM, Chi DYK. Effects of denervation and tenotomy on the gastrocnemius muscle in the frog: a histologic and histochemical study. Anat Rec 1977; 187: 335-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tews DS, Goebel HH, Schneider I, Gunkel A, Stennert E, Neiss WF. Morphology of experimentally denervated and reinnervated rat facial muscle. I. Histochemical and histological findings. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1994; 251: 36-40
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 de Castro Rodrigues A, Andreo JC, Rosa Jr GM, dos Santos NB, Moraes LH, Lauris JR. Fat cell invasion in long-term denervated skeletal muscle. Microsurgery 2007; 27: 664-667
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Petersilge CA, Pathria MN, Gentili A, Recht MP, Resnick D. Denervation hypertrophy of muscle: MR features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1995; 19: 596-600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Tomanek RJ, Lund DD. Degeneration of different types of skeletal muscle fibres. I. Denervation. J Anat 1973; 116: 395-407
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Talmadge RJ. Myosin heavy chain isoform expression following reduced neuromuscular activity: potential regulatory mechanisms. Muscle Nerve 2000; 23: 661-679
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Ohira Y, Yoshinaga T, Ohara M , et al. The role of neural and mechanical influences in maintaining normal fast and slow muscle properties. Cells Tissues Organs 2006; 182: 129-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Borina E, Pellegrino MA, D'Antona G, Bottinelli R. Myosin and actin content of human skeletal muscle fibers following 35 days bed rest. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2010; 20: 65-73
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Booth FW. Effect of limb immobilization on skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 1982; 52: 1113-1118
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Loughna PT, Goldspink DF, Goldspink G. Effects of hypokinesia and hypodynamia upon protein turnover in hindlimb muscles of the rat. Aviat Space Environ Med 1987; 58 (9 Pt 2) A133-138
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Savolainen J, Väänänen K, Puranen J, Takala TE, Komulainen J, Vihko V. Collagen synthesis and proteolytic activities in rat skeletal muscles: effect of cast-immobilization in the lengthened and shortened positions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1988; 69: 964-969
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Rantanen J, Hurme T, Kalimo H. Calf muscle atrophy and Achilles tendon healing following experimental tendon division and surgery in rats. Comparison of postoperative immobilization of the muscle-tendon complex in relaxed and tensioned positions. Scand J Med Sci Sports 1999; 9: 57-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Winchester PK, Gonyea WJ. A quantitative study of satellite cells and myonuclei in stretched avian slow tonic muscle. Anat Rec 1992; 232: 369-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Goldspink DF, Cox VM, Smith SK , et al. Muscle growth in response to mechanical stimuli. Am J Physiol 1995; 268: E288-E297
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Kauhanen S, von Boguslawsky K, Michelsson JE, Leivo I. Satellite cell proliferation in rabbit hindlimb muscle following immobilization and remobilization: an immunohistochemical study using MIB 1 antibody. Acta Neuropathol 1998; 95 (2) 165-170
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Terzis JK, Noah ME. Analysis of 100 cases of free-muscle transplantation for facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 99: 1905-1921
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Iwata Y, Ozaki N, Hirata H , et al. Fibroblast growth factor-2 enhances functional recovery of reinnervated muscle. Muscle Nerve 2006; 34: 623-630
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Kalil-Filho R, Bocchi E, Weiss RG , et al. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of chronic changes in latissimus dorsi cardiomyoplasty. Circulation 1994; 90: II102-II106
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Ylä-Kotola TM, Kauhanen MS, Koskinen SK, Asko-Seljavaara SL. Magnetic resonance imaging of microneurovascular free muscle flaps in facial reanimation. Br J Plast Surg 2005; 58: 22-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Fox MG, Bancroft LW, Peterson JJ, Kransdorf MJ, Terkonda SP, O'Connor MI. MRI appearance of myocutaneous flaps commonly used in orthopedic reconstructive surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 800-806
    Google Scholar
  • 53 Yoshimura K, Harii K, Asato H, Ueda K, Yamada A. Immunohistochemical analysis of clinically transplanted muscles. J Surg Res 1998; 79: 31-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Kuschel R, Yablonka-Reuveni Z, Bornemann A. Satellite cells on isolated myofibers from normal and denervated adult rat muscle. J Histochem Cytochem 1999; 47: 1375-1384
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Carlson BM, Faulkner JA. Muscle regeneration in young and old rats: effects of motor nerve transection with and without marcaine treatment. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 1998; 53: B52-B57
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Stranc MF, Globerman DY. Accidental reinnervation as a complication of latissimus dorsi free flap to the face and scalp. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42: 341-343
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Fawcett JW, Keynes RJ. Muscle basal lamina: a new graft material for peripheral nerve repair. J Neurosurg 1986; 65: 354-363
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Brunelli GA, Battiston B, Vigasio A, Brunelli G, Marocolo D. Bridging nerve defects with combined skeletal muscle and vein conduits. Microsurgery 1993; 14: 247-251
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar