Robotic Assisted Versus Pure Microsurgical Vasectomy Reversal: Technique and Prospective Database Control Trial

Abstract

Microsurgical vasectomy reversal is a technically demanding procedure. Previous studies have shown the possible benefit of robotic assistance during such procedures. Our goal was to compare robotic assisted vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy to standard microsurgical vasovasostomy (MVV) and vasoepididymostomy (MVE). The use of robotic assistance for vasectomy reversal may provide the microsurgeon with improved visualization, elimination of tremor, and decreased fatigue and obviate the need for a skilled microsurgical assistant. This study provides the first clinical prospective control trial of robotic assisted versus pure microsurgical vasectomy reversal. The use of robotic assistance in microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy may have benefit over MVV and MVE with regards to decreasing operative duration and improving the rate of recovery of postoperative total motile sperm counts based on our study.

Keywords

vasovasostomy - vasoepididymostomy - robotic - vasectomy - reversal

• References

• 1 Schwingl PJ, Guess HA. Safety and effectiveness of vasectomy. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 923-936
• 2 Dohle GR, Diemer T, Kopa Z, Krausz C, Giwercman A, Jungwirth A ; European Association of Urology Working Group on Male Infertility. European Association of Urology guidelines on vasectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 159-163
• 3 Silber SJ. Microsurgery in clinical urology. Urology 1975; 6: 150-153
• 4 Owen ER. Microsurgical vasovasostomy: a reliable vasectomy reversal. Aust N Z J Surg 1977; 47: 305-309
• 5 Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M. From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology. BJU Int 2011; 108: 1708-1713 , discussion 1714
• 6 Bourla DH, Hubschman JP, Culjat M, Tsirbas A, Gupta A, Schwartz SD. Feasibility study of intraocular robotic surgery with the da Vinci surgical system. Retina 2008; 28: 154-158
• 7 Casale P. Robotic pediatric urology. Expert Rev Med Devices 2008; 5: 59-64
• 8 Berber E, Siperstein A. Robotic transaxillary total thyroidectomy using a unilateral approach. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2011; 21: 207-210
• 9 Lehr EJ, Rodriguez E, Chitwood WR. Robotic cardiac surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2011; 24: 77-85
• 10 Kuang W, Shin PR, Matin S, Thomas Jr AJ. Initial evaluation of robotic technology for microsurgical vasovasostomy. J Urol 2004; 171: 300-303
• 11 Kuang W, Shin PR, Oder M, Thomas Jr AJ. Robotic-assisted vasovasostomy: a two-layer technique in an animal model. Urology 2005; 65: 811-814
• 12 Schiff J, Li PS, Goldstein M. Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy: a prospective randomized study in a rat model. J Urol 2004; 171: 1720-1725
• 13 Schiff J, Li PS, Goldstein M. Robotic microsurgical vasovasostomy and vasoepididymostomy in rats. Int J Med Robot 2005; 1: 122-126
• 14 Belker AM, Thomas Jr AJ, Fuchs EF, Konnak JW, Sharlip ID. Results of 1,469 microsurgical vasectomy reversals by the Vasovasostomy Study Group. J Urol Nurs 1992; 11: 93-111