Does Delayed Pushing in the Second Stage of Labor Impact Perinatal Outcomes?

Abstract

Objective To estimate maternal, neonatal, and labor outcomes associated with delayed pushing.

Study Design A retrospective cohort study of all consecutive women admitted to a single institution in labor at term who reached the second stage of labor. Pregnancies with multiple fetuses or major anomalies were excluded. Delayed pushing was defined as initiation of pushing ≥60 minutes after complete dilatation. Primary outcome was mode of delivery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to control for confounding.

Results Of the 5290 women who met inclusion criteria, 471 (8.9%) employed delayed pushing, and 4819 (91.1%) pushed immediately. Delayed pushing was associated with increased rates of cesarean, operative vaginal delivery, maternal fever, and lower arterial cord pH. Duration of the second stage and length of time spent pushing were significantly longer with delayed pushing.

Conclusion Delayed pushing is associated with lower rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery and increased adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Keywords

delayed pushing - labor management - second stage

• References

• 1 Le Ray C, Audibert F, Goffinet F, Fraser W. When to stop pushing: effects of duration of second-stage expulsion efforts on maternal and neonatal outcomes in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2009; 201: 361 , e1–e7
• 2 Fraser WD, Marcoux S, Krauss I, Douglas J, Goulet C, Boulvain M ; The PEOPLE (Pushing Early or Pushing Late with Epidural) Study Group. Multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of delayed pushing for nulliparous women in the second stage of labor with continuous epidural analgesia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 182: 1165-1172
• 3 Hansen SL, Clark SL, Foster JC. Active pushing versus passive fetal descent in the second stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2002; 99: 29-34
• 4 Simpson KR, James DC. Effects of immediate versus delayed pushing during second-stage labor on fetal well-being: a randomized clinical trial. Nurs Res 2005; 54: 149-157
• 5 Kelly M, Johnson E, Lee V , et al. Delayed versus immediate pushing in second stage of labor. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs 2010; 35: 81-88
• 6 Gillesby E, Burns S, Dempsey A , et al. Comparison of delayed versus immediate pushing during second stage of labor for nulliparous women with epidural anesthesia. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2010; 39: 635-644
• 7 Vause S, Congdon HM, Thornton JG. Immediate and delayed pushing in the second stage of labour for nulliparous women with epidural analgesia: a randomised controlled trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 186-188
• 8 Roberts CL, Torvaldsen S, Cameron CA, Olive E. Delayed versus early pushing in women with epidural analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2004; 111: 1333-1340
• 9 Brancato RM, Church S, Stone PW. A meta-analysis of passive descent versus immediate pushing in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia in the second stage of labor. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2008; 37: 4-12
• 10 Plunkett BA, Lin A, Wong CA, Grobman WA, Peaceman AM. Management of the second stage of labor in nulliparas with continuous epidural analgesia. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 109-114
• 11 Fitzpatrick M, Harkin R, McQuillan K, O'Brien C, O'Connell PR, O'Herlihy C. A randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal continence. BJOG 2002; 109: 1359-1365
• 12 Mayberry LJ, Hammer R, Kelly C, True-Driver B, De A. Use of delayed pushing with epidural anesthesia: findings from a randomized, controlled trial. J Perinatol 1999; 19: 26-30
• 13 Buxton EJ, Redman CWE, Obhrai M. Delayed pushing with lumbar epidural in labour—does it increase the incidence of spontaneous delivery?. J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 8: 258-261
• 14 Goodfellow CF, Hull MG. Epidural analgesia and assisted delivery. Commentary. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984; 91: 92
• 15 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Operative vaginal delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin 17. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2000
• 16 ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 101: Ultrasonography in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113 (2 Pt 1) 451-461
• 17 Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report of the expert committee on the diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care 2003; 26 (Suppl. 01) S5-S20
• 18 National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in P. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Report of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group on High Blood Pressure in Pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 183: S1-S22
• 19 Allen VM, Baskett TF, O'Connell CM, McKeen D, Allen AC. Maternal and perinatal outcomes with increasing duration of the second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 113: 1248-1258
• 20 Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Caughey AB. How long is too long: does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191: 933-938
• 21 Cheng YW, Hopkins LM, Laros Jr RK, Caughey AB. Duration of the second stage of labor in multiparous women: maternal and neonatal outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196: 585 , e1–e6
• 22 Myles TD, Santolaya J. Maternal and neonatal outcomes in patients with a prolonged second stage of labor. Obstet Gynecol 2003; 102: 52-58
• 23 Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW , et al; Consortium on Safe Labor. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 1281-1287