Download PDF
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2013; 63(07): 264-271
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1321884
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Dimensionen elterlicher Erziehungsstile bei alkoholabhängigen Patienten: Erste Befunde zum Fragebogen zu Erziehungseinstellungen und Erziehungspraktiken (FEPS)

Dimensions of Parental Rearing Styles in Alcohol Dependent Patients: First Results of the Questionnaire on Parental Attitudes and Rearing Practices (FEPS)
Annett Lotzin
1   Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, -psychotherapie und -psychosomatik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
Levente Kriston
2   Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
Hertha Richter-Appelt
3   Institut für Sexualforschung und Forensische Psychiatrie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
Irina Leichsenring
4   Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
Brigitte Ramsauer
1   Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendpsychiatrie, -psychotherapie und -psychosomatik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
Ingo Schäfer
4   Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 23 December 2011

akzeptiert 12 July 2012

Publication Date:
27 February 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Bislang liegt im deutschsprachigen Raum kein Instrument zur Erfassung elterlicher Erziehungsstile vor, das für Patienten mit Suchterkrankungen validiert wurde. Ziel dieser Studie war daher die konfirmatorische Prüfung der Faktorenstruktur des Fragebogens zu Erziehungseinstellungen und Erziehungspraktiken (FEPS) bei 186 alkoholabhängigen Patienten. Das von den Testentwicklern postulierte Modell mit den 4 Faktoren Fürsorge, Autonomie, Geringe Bestrafung und Geringe materielle Belohnung zeigte bei Zulassung von Residualkorrelationen einen akzeptablen Fit (Mutter: χ2/df=1,92, RMSEA=0,07, TLI=0,79; Vater: χ2/df=1,75, RMSEA=0,07, TLI=0,82). Die Faktoren wiesen ausreichende Faktorreliabilitäten sowie gute bis sehr gute interne Konsistenzen auf. Die Faktorladungen, Trennschärfen und Schwierigkeiten der Indikatoren können mit Ausnahme von 2 Items als gut bewertet werden. Diese Ergebnisse weisen auf die faktorielle Validität des FEPS bei Patienten mit Alkoholabhängigkeit hin.

Abstract

To date no instrument for the assessment of parenting styles is available in the German ­language area that has been validated in patients with addictive disorders. Therefore the aim of this study was the confirmatory evaluation of the factor structure of the Questionnaire on Parental Attitudes and Rearing Practices (FEPS) in 186 alcohol dependent patients. The model as proposed by the test developers with the 4 factors Care, Autonomy, Low Punishment, and Low Material Reinforcement showed acceptable fit when residual correlations were allowed (mother: χ2/df=1,92, RMSEA=0,07, TLI=0,79; father: χ2/df=1,75, RMSEA=0,07, TLI=0,82). All factors showed sufficient factor reliabilities as well as good to very good internal consistencies. Factor loadings, discriminations and difficulties of the indicators could be regarded as good, with the exception of 2 items. These results indicate the factorial validity of the FEPS in patients with alcohol dependence.

Schlüsselwörter

Parental Bonding Instrument - Erziehungspraktiken - Alkoholabhängigkeit - faktorielle Validität - Faktorenanalyse

Keywords

parental bonding instrument - parenting style - alcoholism - factorial validity - factor analysis
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Bowlby J. A secure base. Parent-child attachment and healthy human development. New York: Basic Books; 1988
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 2 Flaherty JA, Richman JA. Effects of childhood relationships on the adult’s capacity to form social supports. Am J Psychiatry 1986; 143: 851-855
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Kunzke D, Strauß B, Burtscheidt W. Die Bedeutung traumatischer Erfahrungen und Bindungsstörungen für Entstehung und Psychotherapie des Alkoholismus: Eine Literaturübersicht. Z Klin Psychol Psy­chiatr Psychother 2002; 50: 173-194
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Gerlsma C, Emmelkamp PMG, Arrindell WA. Anxiety, depression, and perception of early parenting: A meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev 1990; 10: 251-277
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 DiBartolo P, Helt M. Theoretical models of affectionate versus affectionless control in anxious families: A critical examination based on observations of parent–child interactions. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev 2007; 10: 253-274
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Blatt SJ, Homann E. Parent-child interaction in the etiology of dependent and self-critical depression. Clin Psychol Rev 1992; 12: 47-91
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Parker G. Parental ‘affectionless control’ as an antecedent to adult depression. A risk factor delineated. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983; 40: 956-960
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Hawkins JD, Catalano RF, Miller JY. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychol Bull 1992; 112: 64-105
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Bernardi E, Jones M, Tennant C. Quality of parenting in alcoholics and narcotic addicts. Br J Psychiatry 1989; 154: 677-682
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 MacMillan HL, Fleming JE, Streiner DL et al. Childhood abuse and lifetime psychopathology in a community sample. Am J Psychiatry 2001; 158: 1878-1883
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Wilsnack SC, Vogeltanz ND, Klassen AD et al. Childhood sexual abuse and women’s substance abuse: National survey findings. J Stud Alcohol 1997; 58: 264-271
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Duncan RD, Saunders BE, Kilpatrick DG et al. Childhood physical assault as a risk factor for PTSD, depression, and substance abuse: findings from a national survey. Am J Orthopsychiatry 1996; 66: 437-448
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Silverman AB, Reinherz HZ, Giaconia RM. The long-term sequelae of child and adolescent abuse: a longitudinal community study. Child Abuse Negl 1996; 20: 709-723
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 DeJong CAJ, van der Staak CPF, van den Brink W. Memories of parental rearing and personality pathology in male alcoholics. Eur Addict Res 1995; 1: 199-205
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Vrasti R, Eisemann M. Perceived parental rearing behaviour in alcoholics. In: Perris C, Arrindell WA, Eisemann M. Hrsg Parenting and psychopathology. New York: John Wiley; 1994: 201-218
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 16 Johnson V, Pandina RJ. Effects of the family environment on adolescent substance use, delinquency, and coping styles. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 1991; 17: 71-88
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Mak AS, Kinsella C. Adolescent drinking, conduct problems, and parental bonding. Aust J Psychol 1996; 48: 15-20
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Barnow S, Schuckit MA, Lucht M et al. The importance of a positive family history of alcoholism, parental rejection and emotional warmth, behavioral problems and peer substance use for alcohol problems in teenagers: A path analysis. J Stud Alcohol 2002; 63: 305-315
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Richter-Appelt H, Schimmelmann BG, Tiefensee J. Questionnaire on parental attitudes and rearing practices (FEPS): An extended version of the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI). Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2004; 54: 23-33
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Parker G, Tupling H, Brown L. A parental bonding instrument. Br J Med Psychol 1979; 52: 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Richter-Appelt H, Brinkmann L, Schutzmann K. Parental bonding in childhood and psychological symptoms in a sample of adults with intersexuality. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol 2006; 56: 325-335
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kazarian SS, Baker B, Helmes E. The Parental Bonding Instrument: Factorial structure. Br J Clin Psychol 1987; 26: 231-232
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Gomez-Beneyto M, Pedros A, Tomas A et al. Psychometric properties of the Parental Bonding Instrument in a Spanish sample. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1993; 23: 252-255
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Cox B, Enns M, Clara I. The Parental Bonding Instrument: Confirmatory evidence for a three-factor model in a psychiatric clinical sample and in the National Comorbidity Survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2000; 35: 353-357
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Lutz R, Heyn C, Kommer D. Fragebogen zur elterlichen Bindung – FEB. In: Lutz R, Mark N. Hrsg Wie gesund sind Kranke? Zur seelischen Gesundheit Kranker. Göttingen: Verlag für angewandte Psychologie; 1995: 183-199
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 26 Schumacher J, Brähler E, Eisemann M. Fragebogen zum erinnerten elterlichen Erziehungsverhalten: FEE. Manual. Bern: Hans Huber; 2000
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 27 Rumpold G, Doering S, Höfer S et al. Der Fragebogen dysfunktionaler elterlicher Beziehungsstile (FDEB). Z psychosom Med Psychother 2002; 48: 59-74
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Skinner BF. Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts; 1969
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 29 Kokkevi A, Hartgers C. EuropASI: European adaptation of a multidimensional assessment instrument for drug and alcohol dependence. Eur Addict Res 1995; 1: 208-210
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Gsellhofer B, Kuefner H, Vogt M et al. European Addiction Severity Index EuropASI: Manual for Training and Application. Stuttgart: Schneider Verlag; 1999
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 31 Schmidt P, Küfner H, Hasemann S et al. Ist der European Addiction Severity Index ein sinnvolles Diagnoseinstrument bei Alkoholabhängigkeit?. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2007; 75: 541-548
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Weiler D, Vogt M, Küfner H. Anwendung des European Addiction Severity Index (EuropASI) im Rahmen einer ambulanten Behandlung von Drogenabhängigen. Sucht 2000; 46: 197-208
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Hoogland JJ, Boomsa A. Robustness studies in covariance structure modeling. Sociol Methods Res 1998; 26: 329-367
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 3. Aufl. New York: Guilford Press; 2011
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 35 Hair JF. Multivariate data analysis. 7. Aufl. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2010
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 36 Arbuckle JL. AMOS (Version 7.0). Chicago, USA 2006
  • 37 SPSS . IBM SPSS Statistics (Version 19). Chicago USA 2010
  • 38 Microsoft Corporation Microsoft Office Excel (Version 12). Redmond, USA 2007
  • 39 Boomsma A. Reporting analyses of covariance structures. Struct Equ Modeling 2000; 7: 461-483
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling 1999; 6: 1-55
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 41 Schermelleh-Engel K, Moosbrugger H. Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Test of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Meth Psychol Res Online 2003; 8: 23-74
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 42 Raykov T. Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Appl Psychol Meas 1997; 21: 173-184
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 43 Bagozzi R, Yi Y. On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Market Sci 1988; 16: 74-94
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 44 Fornell C, Larcker DF. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 1981; 18: 39-50
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 45 Fisseni HJ. Lehrbuch der psychologischen Diagnostik. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2004
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 46 Weise G. Psychologische Leistungstests: Ein Handbuch für Studium und Praxis. Göttingen: Verlag für Psychologie Hogrefe; 1975
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 47 Clark DB, Lesnick L, Hegedus AM. Traumas and other adverse life events in adolescents with alcohol abuse and dependence. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1997; 36: 1744-1751
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 48 Cheng HG, Anthony JC, Huang Y. Harsh physical punishment as a specific childhood adversity linked to adult drinking consequences: Evidence from China. Addiction 2010; 105: 2097-2105
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 49 D’Argembeau A, Van Der Linden M, Verbanck P et al. Autobiographical memory in non-amnesic alcohol-dependent patients. Psychol Med 2006; 36: 1707-1715
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 50 Whiteley C, Wanigaratne S, Marshall J et al. Autobiographical memory in detoxified dependent drinkers. Alcohol Alcohol 2009; 44: 429-430
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 51 Williams JM, Scott J. Autobiographical memory in depression. Psychol Med 1988; 18: 689-695
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 52 Williams JM, Barnhofer T, Crane C et al. Autobiographical memory specificity and emotional disorder. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 122-148
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 53 Lizardi H, Klein DN. Long-term stability of parental representations in depressed Outpatients utilizing the Parental Bonding Instrument. J Nerv Ment Dis 2005; 193: 183-188
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar