Avoidance of Electrode Related MRI Artifact during Staged Deep Brain Stimulator Implantation

Abstract

Background Centers implanting deep brain stimulator (DBS) electrodes on different days often protect the first electrode tip with a protective cap, tunnel it under the scalp, and connect it to the generator at a later procedure. If magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used for planning during the second implantation, MRI artifacts from the protective cap could potentially corrupt the stereotactic coordinates. The importance of this problem may increase if emerging MRI safety data lead to more frequent use of MRI for these purposes.

Objective To describe an MRI artifact arising from the use of the standard protective DBS cap that corrupts stereotactic planning and to describe a way to avoid the artifact.

Methods After noting the artifact during a staged DBS procedure, a nonmetallic silastic sleeve contained in the existing DBS implantation kit was used in nine subsequent patients. Two caps with standard metallic screws were also tested with MRI phantoms.

Results The silastic sleeve protected the DBS electrode but did not produce MRI artifact. The phantom studies demonstrated significant artifact from caps containing screws.

Conclusion A silastic sleeve provides adequate protection of the DBS electrode during staged implantation and avoids the MRI artifact associated with protective caps with screws.

Keywords

deep brain stimulation - MRI artifact - Parkinson's disease

• References

• 1 Rezai AR, Kopell BH, Gross RE , et al. Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: surgical issues. Mov Disord 2006; 21 (Suppl. 14) S197-S218
• 2 Tanei T, Kajita Y, Kaneoke Y, Takebayashi S, Nakatsubo D, Wakabayashi T. Staged bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2009; 151: 589-594
• 3 Saint-Cyr JA, Trépanier LL, Kumar R, Lozano AM, Lang AE. Neuropsychological consequences of chronic bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease. Brain 2000; 123: 2091-2108
• 4 Hunsche S, Sauner D, Maarouf M , et al. Intraoperative X-ray detection and MRI-based quantification of brain shift effects subsequent to implantation of the first electrode in bilateral implantation of deep brain stimulation electrodes. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2009; 87: 322-329
• 5 Elias WJ, Fu KM, Frysinger RC. Cortical and subcortical brain shift during stereotactic procedures. J Neurosurg 2007; 107: 983-988
• 6 Larson PS, Richardson RM, Starr PA, Martin AJ. Magnetic resonance imaging of implanted deep brain stimulators: experience in a large series. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2008; 86: 92-100
• 7 Tagliati M, Jankovic J, Pagan F, Susatia F, Isaias IU, Okun MS ; National Parkinson Foundation DBS Working Group. Safety of MRI in patients with implanted deep brain stimulation devices. Neuroimage 2009; 47 (Suppl. 02) T53-T57
• 8 Uitti RJ, Tsuboi Y, Pooley RA , et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery 2002; 51: 1423-1428 , discussion 1428–1431
• 9 Starr PA, Martin AJ, Ostrem JL, Talke P, Levesque N, Larson PS. Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulator placement using high-field interventional magnetic resonance imaging and a skull-mounted aiming device: technique and application accuracy. J Neurosurg 2010; 112: 479-490
• 10 Chhabra V, Sung E, Mewes K, Bakay RAE, Abosch A, Gross RE. Safety of magnetic resonance imaging of deep brain stimulator systems: a serial imaging and clinical retrospective study. J Neurosurg 2010; 112: 497-502