Endoscopy 2013; 45(06): 489-492
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326375
Case report/series
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Rescue endoscopic bleeding control for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage using clipping and detachable snaring

J. H. Lee
1   Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
,
B. K. Kim
2   Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Hong Ik Hospital, Seoul, Korea
,
D. C. Seol
1   Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
,
S. J. Byun
2   Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Hong Ik Hospital, Seoul, Korea
,
K. H. Park
2   Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Hong Ik Hospital, Seoul, Korea
,
I. K. Sung
1   Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
,
H. S. Park
1   Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
,
C. S. Shim
1   Digestive Disease Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 13 August 2012

accepted after revision 18 December 2012

Publication Date:
11 April 2013 (online)

Nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding recurs after appropriate endoscopic therapy in 10 % – 15 % of cases. The mortality rate can be as high as 25 % when bleeding recurs, but there is no consensus about the best modality for endoscopic re-treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate clipping and detachable snaring (CDS) for rescue endoscopic control of nonvariceal UGI hemorrhage. We report a case series of seven patients from a Korean tertiary center who underwent endoscopic hemostasis using the combined method of detachable snares with hemoclips. The success rate of endoscopic hemostasis with CDS was 86 %: six of the seven patients who had experienced primary endoscopic treatment failure or recurrent bleeding after endoscopic hemostasis were treated successfully. In conclusion, rescue endoscopic bleeding control by means of CDS is an option for controlling nonvariceal UGI bleeding when no other method of endoscopic treatment for recurrent bleeding and primary hemostatic failure is possible.

 
  • References

  • 1 Cryer BL, Wilcox CM, Zlateva G et al. The economics of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a US managed-care setting: a retrospective, claims-based analysis. J Med Econ 2010; 13: 70-77
  • 2 Marmo R, Rotondano G, Bianco MA et al. Outcome of endoscopic treatment for peptic ulcer bleeding: is a second look necessary? A meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 57: 62-67
  • 3 Calvet X, Vergara M, Brullet E et al. Addition of a second endoscopic treatment following epinephrine injection improves outcome in high-risk bleeding ulcers. Gastroenterology 2004; 126: 441-450
  • 4 Kovacs TO, Jensen DM. Recent advances in the endoscopic diagnosis and therapy of upper gastrointestinal, small intestinal, and colonic bleeding. Med Clin North Am 2002; 86: 1319-1356
  • 5 Kawamura T, Yasuda K, Morikawa S et al. Current status of endoscopic management for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Dig Endosc 2010; 22: 26-30
  • 6 Rengen M, Adler D. Detachable snares (Endoloop). Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 8: 12-15
  • 7 Rácz I, Kárász T, Saleh H. Endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding gastric ulcer with a combination of multiple hemoclips and endoloops. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 580-583
  • 8 Lara LF, Sreenarasimhaiah J, Tang SJ et al. Dieulafoy lesions of the GI tract: localization and therapeutic outcomes. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 3436-3441