Z Orthop Unfall 2013; 151(1): 93-106
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328248
Refresher Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Die Bedeutung der Osteoporose für den Orthopäden und Unfallchirurgen

The Significance of Osteoporosis for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgeons
G. Holzer
Universitätsklinik für Orthopädie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Österreich
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
19 February 2013 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Dieser „Refresher“ versucht zweierlei: Einerseits einen aktuellen Überblick über die neuesten Überlegungen zur Definition der Osteoporose und ihr Verhältnis zu Frakturen, andererseits über die derzeitigen diagnostischen Möglichkeiten zur Einschätzung eines zukünftigen Frakturrisikos des individuellen Menschen und die Auflistung und Einschätzung aller zurzeit zur Therapie der Osteoporose zur Verfügung stehenden Medikamente mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Erfordernisse der Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie zu geben. Dieser Themenbereich kann nur eine Wiederholung sein. Für die Vertiefung in einzelne Gebiete liegen ausreichend Publikationen und Richtlinien vor (z. B. S3-Richtlinie zur Diagnose und Therapie der Osteoporose des DVO, http://www.osteoporose-portal.de/arzt/leitlinen).

Abstract

This refresher is concerned with several aspects: to give an overview over the latest considerations concerning the definition of osteoporosis related to fractures as well as to discuss up-to-date diagnostic possibilities in order to estimate the future fraction risk of the individual patient. Furthermore, it gives a summary of medical treatment options particularly under a orthopaedic and trauma surgery point of view. This topic publication can only be a recurrent presentation synopsis for the purpose of revising, as there are several publications and guidelines for advanced subject-specific training (e.g. S3-Richtlinie zur Diagnose und Therapie der Osteoporose des DVO, http://www.osteoporose-portal.de/arzt/leitlinen).

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 IOF. Osteoporosis in the European Union in 2008: ten years of progress and ongoing challenges. Im Internet: http://www.iofbonehealth.org/publications/eu-policy-report-of-2008.html Stand: 13.02.2013
  • 2 Kanis JA, Melton 3rd LJ, Christiansen C et al. The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 1994; 9: 1137-1141
  • 3 NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA 2001; 285: 785-795
  • 4 Fratzl P, Gupta H, Paschalis E et al. Structure and mechanical quality of the collagen mineral nano-composite in bone. J Mater Chem 2004; 14: 2115-2123
  • 5 Holzer G, von Skrbensky G, Holzer LA et al. Hip fractures and the contribution of cortical versus trabecular bone to femoral neck strength. J Bone Miner Res 2009; 24: 468-474
  • 6 Zebaze RM, Ghasem-Zadeh A, Bohte A et al. Intracortical remodelling and porosity in the distal radius and post-mortem femurs of women: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2010; 375: 1729-1736
  • 7 Johnell O, Kanis J. Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16 (Suppl. 02) S3-S7
  • 8 Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J et al. Nationwide decline in incidence of hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 2006; 21: 1836-1838
  • 9 Dimai HP, Svedbom A, Fahrleitner-Pammer A et al. Epidemiology of hip fractures in Austria: evidence for a change in the secular trend. Osteoporos Int 2011; 22: 685-692
  • 10 Cooper C, Campion G, Melton 3rd LJ. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 1992; 2: 285-289
  • 11 Holroyd C, Cooper C, Dennison E. Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocriol Metab 2008; 22: 671-685
  • 12 Grados F, Marcelli C, Dargent-Molina P et al. Prevalence of vertebral fractures in French women older than 75 years from the EPIDOS study. Bone 2004; 34: 362-367
  • 13 Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H et al. FRAX and its applications to clinical practice. Bone 2009; 44: 734-743
  • 14 Ismail AA, Cockerill W, Cooper C et al. Prevalent vertebral deformity predicts incident hip though not distal forearm fracture: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 2001; 12: 85-90
  • 15 Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB et al. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 2000; 15: 721-739
  • 16 Theintz G, Buchs B, Rizzoli R et al. Longitudinal monitoring of bone mass accumulation in healthy adolescents: evidence for a marked reduction after 16 years of age at the levels of lumbar spine and femoral neck in female subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1992; 75: 1060-1065
  • 17 Bachrach LK, Hastie T, Wang MC et al. Bone mineral acquisition in healthy Asian, Hispanic, black, and Caucasian youth: a longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1999; 84: 4702-4712
  • 18 Schönau E. The peak bone mass concept: is it still relevant?. Pediatr Nephrol 2004; 19: 825-831
  • 19 Gafni RI, Baron J. Childhood bone mass acquisition and peak bone mass may not be important determinants of bone mass in late adulthood. Pediatrics 2007; 119 (Suppl. 02) S131-S136
  • 20 Runge M, Rittweger J, Russo CR et al. Is muscle power output a key factor in the age-related decline in physical performance? A comparison of muscle cross section, chair-rising test and jumping power. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2004; 24: 335-340
  • 21 Rittweger J, Felsenberg D. Recovery of muscle atrophy and bone loss from 90 days bed rest: results from a one-year follow-up. Bone 2009; 44: 214-224
  • 22 Holzer G, Holzer LA. Hip protectors and prevention of hip fractures in older persons. Geriatrics 2007; 62: 15-20
  • 23 De Laet C, Kanis JA, Odeän A et al. Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 1330-1338
  • 24 Cole ZA, Gale CR, Javaid MK et al. Maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy and childhood bone mass: a longitudinal study. J Bone Miner Res 2009; 24: 663-668
  • 25 Blain H, Carrière I, Favier F et al. EPIDOS Study Group. Body weight change since menopause and percentage body fat mass are predictors of subsequent bone mineral density change of the proximal femur in women aged 75 years and older: results of a 5 year prospective study. Calcif Tissue Int 2004; 75: 32-39
  • 26 Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O et al. The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 2007; 18: 1033-1046
  • 27 Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, De Laet C et al. Assessment of fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 2005; 16: 581-589
  • 28 Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H. Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. Br Med J 1996; 312: 1254-1259
  • 29 Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA et al. Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164: 1108-1112
  • 30 Fink HA, Milavetz DL, Palermo L et al. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. What proportion of incident radiographic vertebral deformities is clinically diagnosed and vice versa?. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20: 1216-1222
  • 31 Genant HK, Jergas M. Assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis research. Osteoporos Int 2003; 14 (Suppl. 03) S43-S55
  • 32 Anliker M, Bieglmayer C, Dimai H et al. Laboratory diagnostics in the prevention, differential diagnosis and monitoring of osteoporosis. J Lab Med 2009; 33: 140-146
  • 33 Shoback D. Update in osteoporosis and metabolic bone disorders. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92: 747-753
  • 34 Tannenbaum C, Clark J, Schwartzman K et al. Yield of laboratory testing to identify secondary contributors to osteoporosis in otherwise healthy women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002; 87: 4431-4437
  • 35 Peichl P, Holzer LA, Maier R et al. Parathyroid hormone 1–84 accelerates fracture-healing in pubic bones of elderly osteoporotic women. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011; 93: 1583-1587