PDF herunterladen
Planta Med 2013; 79(11): 939-945
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328717
Biological and Pharmacological Activity
Original Papers
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Evaluation of the Genotoxic and Antigenotoxic Potential of the Alkaloid Punarnavine from Boerhaavia diffusa

Vaibhav Aher
1   Division of Pharmaceutical Technology, Defence Research Laboratory, DRDO, Assam, India
2   Department of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Sciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
,
Pronobesh Chattopadhyay
1   Division of Pharmaceutical Technology, Defence Research Laboratory, DRDO, Assam, India
,
Danswrang Goyary
1   Division of Pharmaceutical Technology, Defence Research Laboratory, DRDO, Assam, India
,
Vijay Veer
1   Division of Pharmaceutical Technology, Defence Research Laboratory, DRDO, Assam, India
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

received 24. Februar 2013
revised 29. April 2013

accepted 14. Mai 2013

Publikationsdatum:
03. Juli 2013 (online)

Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

Boerhaavia diffusa is a traditional herbal medicine extensively used in the Ayurveda and Unani forms of medicine in India and many parts of the world. Different parts of the plant are used as an appetizer, alexiteric, eye tonic, for flushing out the renal system, and to treat blood pressure. This study was conducted to evaluate the in vivo genotoxic and/or antigenotoxic potential of punarnavine, a separated alkaloid from the root of B. diffusa using toxicity studies (OECD guideline 474, 1997). The genotoxic and antigenotoxic potential of punarnavine was assayed using the comet assay on lymphocytes, liver, spleen, brain, and bone marrow as well as using the micronucleus test in bone marrow cells including the in vitro chromosomal aberration test. The results demonstrated that none of the tested doses of punarnavine showed genotoxic effects by the comet assay, or clastogenic effects in the micronucleus test. On the other hand, for all cells evaluated, the three tested doses of punarnavine promoted inhibition of DNA damage induced by cyclophosphamide. Based on these results, we concluded that punarnavine, an alkaloid from the Boerhaavia diffusa root, has no genotoxic or clastogenic effects in our experimental conditions. However, it caused a significant decrease in DNA damage induced by cyclophosphamide. It is suggested that the antigenotoxic properties of this alkaloid may be of great pharmacological importance and beneficial for cancer prevention.

Key words

punarnavine - antigenotoxic effects - comet assay - micronucleus test - chromosome aberration test - Boerhaavia diffusa - Nyctaginaceae
 

  • References

  • 1 Agarwal RR, Dutt SS. Chemical examination of Punarnava or Boerhaavia diffusa Linn. II. Isolation of an alkaloid Punarnavine. Proc Natl Acad Sci United Provinces 1935; 5: 240-242
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Kuttan G, Manu KA. Immunomodulatory activities of Punarnavine, an alkaloid from Boerhaavia diffusa . Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol 2009; 31: 377-387
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Sumati S, Zafar R. Genus Boerhaavia . Indian J Nat Prod 2003; 19: 3-10
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Kuttan G, Manu KA. Punarnavine induces apoptosis in B16F-10 melanoma cells by inhibiting NF-kappa B signaling. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2009; 10: 1031-1037
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Sreeja S, Sreeja S. An in vitro study on antiproliferative and antiestrogenic effects of Boerhaavia diffusa L. extracts. J Ethnopharmacol 2009; 126: 221-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Sohni YR, Kaimal P, Bhatt RM. The antiamoebic effect of a crude drug formulation of herbal extracts against Entamoeba histolytica in vitro and in vivo . J Ethnopharmacol 1995; 45: 43-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Saraf MN, Mungantiwar AA, Nair AM, Shinde UA, Dikshit VJ, Thakur VS, Sainis KB. Studies on the immunomodulatory effects of Boerhaavia diffusa alkaloidal fraction. J Ethnopharmacol 1999; 65: 125-131
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Firenzuoli F, Gori L. Herbal medicine today: clinical and research issues. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2007; 4: 37-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Seeff LB. Herbal hepatotoxicity. Clinics Liver Dis 2007; 11: 577-596
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Tang JL, Liu BY, Ma KW. Traditional Chinese medicine. Lancet 2008; 372: 1938-1940
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Shin IS, Seo CS, Lee MY, Ha HK, Huh JI, Shin HK. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the genotoxicity of Gumiganghwal-tang, a traditional herbal prescription. J Ethnopharmacol 2012; 141: 350-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Bellini MF, Angeli JPF, Matuao R, Terezan AP, Ribeiro LR, Mantovani MS. Antigenotoxicity of Agaricus blazei mushroom organic and aqueous extracts in chromosomal aberration and cytokinesis block micronucleus assays in CHO-K1 and HTC cells. Toxicol In Vitro 2006; 20: 355-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ames BN. Dietary carcinogens and anti-carcinogens. Science 1983; 221: 1256-1264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Ames BN, Profet M, Gold LS. Natureʼs chemicals and synthetic chemicals: comparative toxicology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990; 87: 7782-7786
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Demma J, Engidawork E, Hellman B. Potential genotoxicity of plant extracts used in Ethiopian traditional medicine. J Ethnopharmacol 2009; 122: 136-142
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Akiyama M, Umeki S, Kusunoki Y, Kyoizumi S, Nakamura N, Mori T, Ishikawa Y, Yamakido M, Ohama K, Kodama T, Endo K, Cologne JB. Somatic cell mutations as a possible predictor of cancer risk. Health Phys 1995; 68: 643-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gajdusek D. The transmissible amyloidoses genetic control of spontaneous generation of infectious amyloid proteins by nucleation of configurational change in host precursors: Kuru-CJD-GSS-Scrapie-BSE. Eur J Epidemiol 1997; 7: 567-577
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Flora DS, Izzotti SA, Randernath K, Bartsch H, Nair J, Balansky R, Vanschooten F, Degan P, Fronza G, Walsh D, Lewtas J. DNA adducts and chronic degenerative disease. Pathogenetic relevance and implications in preventive medicine. Mutat Res 1996; 366: 197-238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Dearfield KL, Cimino MC, McCarroll NE, Mauer I, Valcovic LR. Genotoxicity risk assessment: a proposed classification strategy. Mutat Res 2002; 521: 121-135
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Umar-Tsafe N, Mohamed-Said M, Rosli R, Din BL, Lai LC. Genotoxicity of goniothalamin in CHO cell line. Mutat Res 2004; 562: 91-102
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 OECD. Guideline for testing of chemicals. Acute oral toxicity- acute toxic class method 423. Paris: OECD; 2001
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Singh NP. Microgels for estimation of DNA strand breaks, DNA protein crosslinks and apoptosis. Mutat Res 2000; 455: 111-127
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Vandghanooni S, Eskandani M. Comet assay: a method to evaluate genotoxicity of the nano drug delivery system. Bioimpact 2011; 1: 87-97
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 OECD. Guideline for testing of chemicals. Mammalian erythrocyte micronucleus test. 474. Paris: OECD; 1997
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Krishna G, Hayashi M. In vivo rodent micronucleus assay: protocol, conduct and data interpretation. Mutat Res 2000; 455: 155-166
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Schmid W. The micronucleus test. Mutat Res 1976; 31: 9-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Gollapudi B, Karma OP. An application of a simple giemsa staining method in the micronucleus test. Mutat Res 1979; 64: 45-46
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Alimba CG, Bakare AA, Latunji CA. Municipal landfill leachates induced chromosome aberrations in rat bone marrow. Afr J Biotechnol 2006; 5: 2053-2057
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Bakare AA, Okunola AA, Adetunji OA, Jenmi HB. Genotoxicity assessment of a pharmaceutical effluent using four bioassays. Genet Mol Biol 2009; 32: 373-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Preston RJ, Dean BJ, Galloway S, Holden H, McFee AF, Shelby M. Mammalian in vivo cytogenetic assays: analysis of chromosome aberrations in bone marrow cells. Mutat Res 1987; 189: 157-165
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 OECD. In vitro mammalian chromosome aberration test. Guideline for testing of chemicals 473. Paris: OECD; 1997
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Waters MD, Brady AL, Stack HF, Brockman HE. Antimutagenicity profiles for some model compounds. Mutat Res 1990; 238: 57-85
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Brendler-Schwaab S, Hartmann A, Pfuhler S, Speit G. The in vivo comet assay: use and status in genotoxicity testing. Mutagen 2005; 20: 245-254
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Tice RR, Agurell E, Anderson D, Burlinson B, Hartmann A, Kobayashi H, Miyamae Y, Rojas E, Ryu JC, Sasaki YF. Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ Mol Mutagen 2000; 35: 206-221
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wise JP, Wise SS, Little JE. The cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of particulate and soluble hexavalent chromium in human lung cells. Mutat Res 2002; 517: 221-229
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Celik A, Birgiil M, Yusuf C, Ulku C. Cytogenetic effect of lambda cyhalothrin on Wistar rat bone marrow. Mutat Res 2003; 539: 91-97
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Shin IS, Seo CS, Lee MY, Ha HK, Huh JI, Shin HK. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the genotoxicity of Gumiganghwal-tang, a traditional herbal prescription. J Ethnopharmacol 2012; 141: 350-356
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Seeff LB. Herbal hepatotoxicity. Clinics Liver Dis 2007; 11: 577-596
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Nwakanma NMC, Okoli EB. Cytological effects of the root extracts of Boerhaavia diffusa on root tips of Crinum jagus . Eur Asian J Biosci 2010; 4: 105-111
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Sreeja S, Sreeja S. An in vitro study on antiproliferative and antiestrogenic effects of Boerhaavia diffusa L. extracts. J Ethnopharmacol 2009; 126: 221-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Sohni YR, Kaimal P, Bhatt RM. The antiamoebic effect of a crude drug formulation of herbal extracts against Entamoeba histolytica in vitro and in vivo . J Ethnopharmacol 1995; 45: 43-52
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar